# Motion to Ban 'anew1' (split from "What a person is...")

**URL:** https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/motion-to-ban-anew1-split-from-what-a-person-is/86404
**Category:** Meta
**Created:** [October 14, 2026, 1:13pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/motion-to-ban-anew1-split-from-what-a-person-is/86404 "2026-10-14T13:13:21Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 74

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Flannel\_Jesus](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/user_avatar/www.ilovephilosophy.com/flannel_jesus/32/9541_2.png) [@Flannel\_Jesus](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Flannel_Jesus)
#### Post date: [October 17, 2026, 9:07am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/motion-to-ban-anew1-split-from-what-a-person-is/86404/74 "2026-10-17T09:07:02Z")

</div>

Another great example of Anews terribly obnoxious posting style:

> [@Why is the male sex drive more stronger and visual than women's sex drive?](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/why-is-the-male-sex-drive-more-stronger-and-visual-than-womens-sex-drive/86424/3):
>
> One could also just as easily ask, ‘Why is the sex drive in some women stronger and more visual than some men’s sex drive?’. Either way, the answer to the reason for both is still the exact same.

Either way, the reason is the same. Great. But he doesn’t tell you the reason. Why not? He wants you to BEG him for it. Instead of just making a single post that makes a clear point, he TEASES you with a point, he teases you with the promise of some insight that he might give to you if you beg the right way for it.

And then when you’ve begged enough, the insight turns out to be some tautological crap that wasn’t worth all the effort it took to beg him for it. Some stupid shit like “the reason they both do it is because of their psychology”, or some such other equally obvious and useless answer.

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/motion-to-ban-anew1-split-from-what-a-person-is/86404)._