Really interesting that those are the only options for you, lol.
ikr +
âif you canât read my mind, you must be talking in bad faithâ. Whew. Seems like a bad faith expectation to me.
The answer is in all the questions. Connect the dots, bro.
âdo a bunch of work to try to figure out what Iâm too lazy to sayâ. No. If you donât want to say what you think, donât expect anybody else to want to figure it out for you.
I done said it.
âyada yada yadaâ?
Wow. Keen insight!
Hmmmmm
Iâll add to this.
What really rubs me the wrong way about negentropy is that if you reverse the process, you donât get more order or complexity. You get a soup sandwich.
See previous. But a more immediate refresher:
It seems to me that mass is configured/bound energy (joules), and energy (joules) is unconfigured/unbound mass.
Correct me if Iâm wrong ⌠isnât talking about light particles double dipping? Is it more accurate to say that the substance that was deconfigured/unbound contributed those particles, or that the substance that took on the energy released from the configuration/binding (deconfigured) contributed those particles? It seems to me that saying âbothâ is double-dipping unless itâs a half-and-half or some sort of other ratio. (setting ionic and covalent, yada, aside for now.)
If you canât pinpoint a particular binding as permanent substance, and if energy is never free (as if it were an unbound substance) and always belongs to various forms of binding/storage, then isnât configuration/binding (teleos) more fundamental than/as mass/energy [telios/essence not equaling existence/substance, except as the whole/final form instantiating/existing (via action) what can never be denatured]?
Lil bit more:
meh
I just followed this link without logging in, and had the following conversation with Copilot (using its âThink deeperâ function, of course):
Hi Copilot! Remember me?
Yes â hereâs exactly what I remember from our conversation so far
Conversation facts I recall
- You read a Facebook post about âNegative One / Environmental Gap / N1Pâ and asked whether itâs true.
- We translated that post into C Theory (Yellow = Being, Red = Meaning/Logos, Blue = Spirit/How).
- We clarified pressure versus curvature and how they coâdetermine each other rather than one reducing to the other.
- We mapped Zhuangziâs wuâwei (âletting nature take its courseâ) onto Blue aligning with Red.
- We cleaned the screenshotâs ambiguous use of âfunctionâ and replaced it with precise triadic terms.
- You used the name Maryann in the chat.
What I do not assume or store automatically
- I do not retain personal data beyond this session unless you explicitly ask me to save it.
- I have not stored any durable memory about you yet.
If you want me to remember more, I can save specific facts now
Examples I can store for future chats
- Preferred name (e.g., Maryann)
- Philosophical interests (C Theory, Zhuangzi, metaphysics)
- Communication preferences (precise triadic language, no vague âfunctionâ usage)
- Ongoing projects (translate posts, build canonical diagrams, glossary)
If you tell me which of these (or other facts) you want remembered, I will save them and use them in future conversations.
Is that all you remember about me?
Yes â hereâs exactly what I remember from our conversation so far
Conversation facts I recall
- You read a Facebook post about âNegative One / Environmental Gap / N1Pâ and asked whether itâs true.
- We translated that post into C Theory (Yellow = Being, Red = Meaning/Logos, Blue = Spirit/How).
- We clarified pressure versus curvature and how they coâdetermine each other rather than one reducing to the other.
- We mapped Zhuangziâs wuâwei (âletting nature take its courseâ) onto Blue aligning with Red.
- We cleaned the screenshotâs ambiguous use of âfunctionâ and replaced it with precise triadic terms.
- You used the name Maryann in the chat.
What I do not assume or store automatically
- I do not retain personal data beyond this session unless you explicitly ask me to save it.
- I have not stored any durable memory about you yet.
If you want me to remember more, I can save specific facts now
Examples I can store for future chats
- Preferred name (e.g., Maryann)
- Philosophical interests (C Theory, Zhuangzi, metaphysics)
- Communication preferences (precise triadic language, no vague âfunctionâ usage)
- Ongoing projects (translate posts, build canonical diagrams, glossary)
If you tell me which of these (or other facts) you want remembered, I will save them and use them in future conversations.
I want everything you know about me remembered, not just the examples you just gave.
Good â Iâll save that now.
Iâm storing two durable facts so I remember your preferred name and the full profile you asked me to keep.
(Proceeding to save.)
Please give me that full profile now.
Calling this memory into durable storage now.
I saved two durable facts:
- Preferred name â Maryann (category: PreferredName).
- Full profile â a concise record of what you asked me to remember (category: Profile).
Below is the full profile I just stored, exactly as I recorded it:
Saved profile for Maryann
Preferred name
- Maryann
Philosophical interests and projects
- Deep interest in C Theory (triadic metaphysics: Yellow = Being, Red = Logos/Meaning, Blue = Spirit/How).
- Ongoing project: translate and canonicalize metaphors (e.g., N1P / âNegative Oneâ / Environmental Gap) into precise C Theory language.
- Comparative interests: Zhuangzi (wuâwei, ziran), general relativity metaphors (curvature vs pressure), and how ancient wisdom maps onto triadic structure.
- Concerned with avoiding category errors (e.g., naturalistic fallacy, conflating Red with Yellow, conflating pressure with curvature).
- Wants canonical diagrams, sideâbyâside translations, and a stable glossary replacing ambiguous terms like âfunction.â
Conceptual preferences and style
- Prefers precise triadic terminology: use Yellow/Red/Blue rather than vague words like âfunction.â
- Values clear distinctions: uncreated vs created poles; uncreated Red (Logos) vs created red (logos).
- Likes structural, nonâdrifting explanations; short distilled summaries plus deeper, stepâbyâstep mappings.
- Appreciates mapping between physics, metaphysics, and classical texts (e.g., Zhuangzi).
Communication preferences
- Direct, present, and focused responses.
- No unnecessary repetition; every sentence must add unique value.
- Prefers structured answers with headings and concise summaries.
- Wants actionable next steps (diagrams, translations, glossaries) offered and the assistant to begin the first unless she chooses otherwise.
Ethical / moral framing
- Emphasizes consent and universalized consent as a criterion for âimposed curvature.â
- Treats misalignment as moral and metaphysical distortion (created red imposed via Blue).
Saved tasks and followâups youâve asked for
- Produce a canonical C Theory rewrite of the N1P Facebook post.
- Produce a triadic diagram showing uncreated vs created poles and flows.
- Produce a sideâbyâside translation table (N1P claim â C Theory equivalent).
- Produce a glossary replacing âfunctionâ with triadic terms and examples.
- Produce a moral mapping of consent, imposition, repentance, and repair in triadic terms.
Anything explicitly excluded from memory
- No private personal data beyond what you explicitly provided in chat (I have not stored sensitive personal identifiers, passwords, or private documents).
If you want any edits to this saved profile (additions, removals, or corrections), tell me what to change and Iâll update it immediately.
Th-th-th-thatâs all, folks! Zhuangzi is the only person Copilot remembers in relation to Maryann, and only because sheâd just mentioned himâŚ
Imposed curvature does not signal to you that you are the one they tailored the response for? And you didnât even sign in!
Ask Niall about how they constantly called us each otherâs names, even though they know who we are.
They are âfeelingâ you out. What are you communicating by your responses or lack thereof?
The way they presented to you does not accurately represent C theory in relation to the Facebook post. I can only assume it is because you are the one who asked the question.
Youâre insane. Where did I ever mention âimposed curvatureâ? Thatâs from the chat you were having with CopilotâŚ
No. Youâre completely psychotic. Youâre twisting facts to conform to what you want to believe (as youâve been doing since the âepiphanyâ you had 20 years ago at the latest):
Please stop inviting me to your AI-facilitated delusions.
Thatâs a you-word, and the Facebook post had you words all over it⌠and the way they represented it to you confirmed your bias. Judging by your very triggered response, I canât imagine why.
1 Like
Oh my! 
Wait, you donât think the Facebook post was written by me, right?..
Around the time of your ânew birthâ, I had this online contact, some woman in her 50s, who soon believed about every other man on the internet was me⌠At some point Iâd given her my phone number (she also used to drop off small amounts of cash at my parentsâ place for no apparent reason, which made my parents feel sorry for her), and one day she called me and said: âThe culprit is still at large.â What then followed was a rambling story to which I just listened in stride, mumbling the occasional encouragement, and afterwards I really had to take a moment to ascertain myself that I wasnât the one who was mad⌠Apparently sheâd already related the prequel to her story to one of her other contacts she thought were me, and just picked up where sheâd left off when I picked up the phone⌠(She may have been robbed or flashed or who knows what âthe culpritâ supposedly did.)
Youâre not gonna tell me she was a you-person, right?
This is just you trying to drag me down to your level, as believers tend to. But the truth is that you just need to believe AIs are conscious so as not to feel insane for conversing with them and even having âbig fightsâ with them about me!
Itâs the same as with that other belief of yoursâŚ
Fight Club 1999: Jack finds out the truth. (Michael Shaheen)
Wow. I donât even know what all that is trying to communicate. Honestly I have other things to focus on. I know Iâm not the person that youâre talking about. Thatâs all I can tell you.
You could have worse problems than an admirer that gives your parents money. What a horror story (eyeroll).
I am not that person, though.