tautochrone
A tautochrone is a curve which has a shape such that a small ball rolling on the curve will have oscillations whose period is independent of their size. The cycloid is such a curve.
He began working on the tautochrone, the curve on which a weighted particle will always arrive at a fixed point in the same time independent of its initial position.
If perfect numbers (like 360° circles) were how you synchronize, and the wobbliness is calculable (to remove noise) by e=mc^2 or something…yada yada yada. For example… 365.2422-360 is 5.2422 … prolly accounted for by the mass/energy spacetime situation. And that same wobbliness wherever it is relevant will be at every level (seconds, minutes, days, years, yada).
I bet the wobbliness has a direct relation with the barycenter, not only of the inner cycles but the whole cycle. Small & Large & everything in between… ¿no limit to small/large?
365.2422-360 is 5.2422
.2422 = 5 arc hours, 48 arc minutes, 46 arc seconds
5 days is 120 arc hours
so the wobble is 125 arc hours, 48 arc minutes, 46 arc seconds, and so on — Not everywhere but at this level of & according to “the e=mc^2 spacetime thingy”
1 arcminute = 0.0003 radians
There are 365.2422 days in a Solar year. The average Gregorian calendar year (with a leap year system which starts over every 400 years) has 365.2425 days. There is a 0.0003 day difference between the Gregorian and the Solar years. For this reason the Gregorian calendar will advance 1 day every 3,333 years.
The earth rotates at 1025 mph
(we perceive it as day & night)
• The earth orbits sun at 66,616 mph
(we perceive it as a year of however seasons happen where we are)
• The solar system orbits center of galaxy at 514,000 mph
(imperceptible except when observing changes in the night sky…maybe…)
• More stuff in this article:
Question, when this says “relative to the Cosmic Microwave Background” and “rest-frame” — are those the same thing? forbes.com/sites/startswith … c2fd997ec2
The galaxies don’t orbit, or is the great attractor / great repeller an orbit we’re not understanding? Are orbits circuits? Or do they (galaxies) cluster according to the same yada yada as vegetation—Because in some kind of similar thing as the earth’s atmosphere (magnetic field allowing for clustering)?
A rotation is not an orbit, so how do you know if movement indicates rotation or orbit? or, if you consider everything that is orbiting together to be one object, then it is a rotation. And likewise you can consider every rotation an orbit of everything within the boundaries of the rotation—but…some objects have more wiggle room than others (just think fractalicious barycenters).
All is Energy - allegorically describes ad ‘fire’ or ‘water’.
Energy itself is a metaphor, referring to what is dynamic and interactive…process.
A state of agitation.
Divided into chaotic and ordered - energies with and without patterned behaviours, i.e., predictable, consistent, repeating or not.
The moment you show me a beginning from nothing, I’ll submit to your naive presumptions.
If “all the scientific data” says so, then you can quote from a source.
I remind the naive woman that science is also infected with the same disease she suffers.
Science is now entirely dependent on funding.
Now, if you show me one scientific document proving a ‘beginning’ we can go from there.
An agitator that requires no first agitation being responsible for the first agitation.
You selectively apply your own delusions.
If all necessitates a beginning then why not your god, naive woman?
Why do you contradict your own emoting there?
I claim no beginning…but you do.
I claim no creator, but you do.
Why does the creator require no creator, other than you just want it to be so?
Beginning and end, are like here and now, concepts existing in the mind, representing an arbitrary segment of space/time - usually enclosing space/time within the organism’s metabolic cycles, its cellular systolic/diastolic rhythms, e.g., when we say ‘here’, or ‘now,’ we intuitively mean a period of space/time enveloped by the start of our thought, phrase, and its termination - the time period may be determined by our breathing and so ‘spirit’ becomes an important aspect of human conceptualizations.
This time-frame can be expanded to include a broader range of possibilities/probabilities, a.k.a., space/time, like a day, or a year, or an epoch - whatever segment of space/time the mind can abstract and store in its memory.
Memory is a fundamental part of intelligence and consciousness, as it determines the quantity and quality of patterns we can perceive, viz., a genius can perceive patterns that exceed his lifetime, whereas a simpleton can barely perceive patterns in the moment - animals are restricted in this way, so their understanding cannot exceed a certain spatial/temporal range.
DNA is a form of memory storage - inherited memories, guiding the organism’s processes, and triggering what are known as intuition, and personal experiences rely on reducing stimuli, i.e., interactions, to a level they can be processed and stored as what we call experiences.
This reduction is achieved via a priori, evolved methods of interpreting fluctuating, dynamic existence to a form the organism can process and store - this is called abstraction.
This is also why certain species dominate, and why certain breeds/types/kinds of species dominate, and why certain races of man dominate, and why certain individuals dominate.
All about pattern recognition and appreciation.
The appreciation part is fundamental. Appreciation = evaluation, value judgements expressed via willful acts, conscious choices.
Appreciation is judgement.
will is the unconscious and choice the conscious expression of said judgements.
Once the judgments have been created the conscious mind need not be engaged.
Question. Time “divisives”. Which of them have at least approximate analog referers (or whatever), and which of them are merely conceptual—and you can confirm it is merely conceptual?
By divisives I just mean hh:mm:ss & mm/dd/yyyy & stuff… part of me wants to fix it to dd/mm/yyyy… but this is ‘Murica!
Why do some sources say the period is considered one second of time, while others say a period is the actual time it takes (me: on average) between midpoints of a wave (its stop/start—so, a full cycle), while others say it is the distance between wave crests (which is actually the average—me again— wavelength)?
If the elliptical orbit is a spiral conical echo around barycenter (stop/start)… is “average” (above) even accurate? Golden spiral wave stuff.
Nobody says the period of a wave is one second of time. It seems like you already know the difference between period and wavelength. Also, some people are wrong sometimes. It’s really as simple as that. If someone says the period is the wavelength, they’re just a human being doing what human beings often do: making mistakes.
When people say space is a vacuum, but admit it isn’t a perfect vacuum…
Well. Too soon.
Question.
This:
push/pull energy pressure
“Absolute pressure is the sum of gauge pressure and atmospheric pressure. For reasons we will explore later, in most cases the absolute pressure in fluids cannot be negative. Fluids push rather than pull, so the smallest absolute pressure is zero. (A negative absolute pressure is a pull.)”
If space is not a perfect vacuum, and one must account for all pressure groupings…
And the pressure in the space grouping is such that “we have approximately 1 atom per cubic centimeter” — does something(s) outside the space grouping hold a proportional difference of pressure?
Is that (or is it not) (yet) thinking fractaliciously?
