QM is entirely imaginary. You can make as many imaginary “dimensions” as you like.
Um, people like to believe that intelligent Creation is imaginary too. Care to counter my assertions regarding existence?
I requested a permaban and they granted it.
I had over 5,000 posts there, and I really liked James, but they kept banning me to shut me up. Their loss!

QM is entirely imaginary. You can make as many imaginary “dimensions” as you like.
It has to conform to the standard model.
You could say the standard model is imaginary as well.
Now we have methods of predicting from QM … our plasma television sets.
Using statistical ‘randomness’ to form all the shows we watch.
Obsrvr, you’re smart, but you need to get out more…
obsrvr524:
Motor Daddy:I used to be on another forum, and James was the mod. They sound a lot alike.
What forum was that?
I requested a permaban and they granted it.
I had over 5,000 posts there, and I really liked James, but they kept banning me to shut me up. Their loss!
I’m in the midst of dealing with those mentally, handicapped snobs right now. At sciforums new philosophy is not philosophy.

I’m in the midst of dealing with those mentally, handicapped snobs right now. At sciforums philosophy is not philosophy.
James is great. The rest of them suck! All the good people left anyway. I used to really love that place. It was a fantastic place when I was there in 2010-2014
WendyDarling:
I’m in the midst of dealing with those mentally, handicapped snobs right now. At sciforums philosophy is not philosophy.
James is great. The rest of them suck! All the good people left anyway. I used to really love that place. It was a fantastic place when I was there is 2010-2014
Anybody who accuses me of having a sockpuppet without proof is as dumb as dirt in my book.

obsrvr524:
QM is entirely imaginary. You can make as many imaginary “dimensions” as you like.
Um, people like to believe that intelligent Creation is imaginary too.
I didn’t say that I like to believe that QM is imaginary. It is a fact that QM IS imaginary. Being imaginary doesn’t stop understandings from working. It just forces a limit on them.

WendyDarling:
obsrvr524:
QM is entirely imaginary. You can make as many imaginary “dimensions” as you like.
Um, people like to believe that intelligent Creation is imaginary too.
I didn’t say that I like to believe that QM is imaginary. It is a fact that QM IS imaginary. Being imaginary doesn’t stop understandings from working. It just forces a limit on them.
And intelligent Creation?

Anybody who accuses me of having a sockpuppet without proof is as dumb as dirt in my book.
It’s a waste of time to try to pin down a sock puppet. I quit worrying about that 20 years ago. You know there are tons of them on every board. You can’t verify anything, and no sock puppet ever admitted it when accused. So why bother.
Just treat everyone as if they are an undercover FBI agent looking to entrap you into saying something you wouldn’t have said otherwise.
WendyDarling:
Anybody who accuses me of having a sockpuppet without proof is as dumb as dirt in my book.
It’s a waste of time to try to pin down a sock puppet. I quit worrying about that 20 years ago. You know there are tons of them on every board. You can’t verify anything, and no sock puppet ever admitted it when accused. So why bother.
Sock puppets can be found out. I spot them all the time however I never harass anyone because of them. Sending Mod warnings against some unfounded paranoia is bougie BS. On top of that, my philosophy thread was moved to the chat area, even though there was philosophy being done in the thread. Besides all that, many posters there abuse you with their frustrated lack of understanding.

And intelligent Creation?
If you understand it correctly - it is true.
If you misunderstand it - it is false.

WendyDarling:
And intelligent Creation?
If you understand it correctly - it is true.
If you misunderstand it - it is false.
Dodgy answer

obsrvr524:
WendyDarling:
And intelligent Creation?
If you understand it correctly - it is true.
If you misunderstand it - it is false.
Dodgy answer
But factual