multiverse and the evolving biocosm?

Patially inspired by Biocosm banter,
I suspect the stability of the universe is its “survival” factor, or what makes it exist-- and the biproduct is that life can “inhabit” that universe–but the main factor here is the growing of new blackholes, which contain more universes.

4/23/2006

Universe A creates Blackholes B1, B2, B3, B4, etc.

Within each black hole is another universe [another A].

Evolution principals of macrolife on earth may also apply to a multiverse creation principal.

The universes that are able to make more black holes–will be “sexually selected”–in that they reproduce more, and become more pronounced.

R is more often distructive then it is good, much like random genetic macromutation(?)
If R is applied to each B [which is a basic replica, but has slight random mutation], and R has a uniqueness factor, general structure of eventual and evolving sub-universes will become more complex and proficient, though they will always hold onto their simple and primary foundations [much like life on earth always reproducing].

At far lower areas of the multiverse,
There are more often instances of exotic matter or energy
that do not behave in a normal and simple way.
Will these more advanced and diverse universes also contain more exotic structure?

Arguably, animate life forms are an exotic structure,
that can exist–built of non-exotic matter or energy.
Life is not exotic matter, it is exotic structure(?)

If exotic structure requires a random and rare event to initiate it [ex: low odds of life evolving on earth]
This means that it needs more oppertunities to “throw the dice”
And this depends on how many planets+stars the universe has.
Size and seed of a universe–the amount of “stuff” it would naturally have in it
Is a pro-reproductive factor of its general structure/existence.

The usual pattern [theoretically] is:
More evolved universes contain more blackholes, kinds of matter, kinds of energy, planets, stars, nebulas, and “physical laws”.

Our organic lives may have arisen during a far later stage or era in the multiverse’s evolution process
If multiverse evolution is a factor that effects existence of “life” in some area of that universe.

On note of “TimeCube”:
Are all blackholes cubable spheres?
Would this mean a universe is ultimately cubable aswel?

Is a sphere always a natural and imperfect shape,
Only produced by evolution
And cubable?

Was this also inspired by Quentin Smith’s and Lee Smolin’s speculations in the 1990’s about the evolution of universes?

Having an unlimited number of universes and many possible outcomes amongst universes would seem to provide favourable conditions for emergence of exotic structures. However, a fundamental principle in evolution is that populations of highly probable structures propagate and mutate into populations of even more highly probable structures. Less probable structures do not propagate, but they disappear after a brief existence. All living organisms are highly intricate structures. Therefore, any kind of evolution would require a highly intricate system to be built into the fundamental fabric of nature before anything could evolve at all. The intricate laws of nature determine what is probable and what is improbable.

Is it more likely that infinite universes spontaniously appear, vs a possible reproduction cycle?

What you said about improbable/probable:
There’s been speculation that even 1 misplaced atom could have ruined the entire bigbang… :astonished:

Given an infinite future, the laws of nature would dictate an infinite number of universes arising from quantum-mechanical vacuum fluctuations, without necessity of a reproduction cycle. Quentin Smith must have abandoned the evolution of universes idea, because he later decided that a big-bang event has a 95% probability of producing a universe with physical properties similar to ours.

I did not hear about this, but atoms do not appear until well after a big-bang.