Just watched a few minutes, looks interesting. I did a search on Youtube and I came across this post film presentation by the producer who states that the women’s lib movement was financed for motives other than the ones officially set forth (about one minute in).
The income tax didn’t come into play until 1913, so… yes, they did.
Edit: Even though I’ve already said this, I’m gonna say it again as I’m almost certain you are lost here:
I’m not talking about -all- taxes, I’m talking about the unconstitutional income tax that is being fraudulently perpetuated by certain indivduals controlled by the European Bankers/Rockafellers.
The US constitution treats labor as a private property and cannot be taxed according to US law.
Mr. P, Gobbo has set the record by making 387 consecutive, incorrect statements, but he is right here. The US government relied largely on tariffs and excise taxes until the income tax was implemented - and I don’t know the exact year, but Gobbo is close if not on the money.
Now you have start over, Gobbo. I don’t think you can top 387.
Well, here’s a good start. The US Supreme Court says the income tax is constitutional. And as you should know, it is the final arbiter on the constitutionality of acts of Congress. So, if it (edit:SCOTUS) says it (edit:income tax) is constitutional, it (edit:income tax) is. Doesn’t matter whether you agree with it (the income tax or the SCOTUS). That’s law.
Before taxes and the social programs that they fund most countries were hell soaked. Income tax is a way to have all of the people fund programs that make the society more livable.
The “European Bankers” is usually code for “Jew” and “Jew” is usually code for communist in this context. Notice how in the beginning of the film the people questioned about taxes answered that they wouldn’t pay them if they didn’t have to. If it wasn’t for “communists” that would be the case. Then, you could kiss public schools, hospitals, and services for the aged goodbye.
I’m discussing sections of the film even, what gives?
Gobbo, have you any insight into the fact that you’re at times totally without reason? It appears that you emotionally react and believe that to be good enough. It’s not the best trait in a discussion.
Where do you think that Roman people got money from?
Could it have been from income, perhaps
Other governments had serfs and slaves to build wealth for no other reason than to do so for the powerful. There was nothing for them. They lived and died simply to work.
That’s they way it used to be and still is in some places.
The only reason I’m reacting with even a hint of emotion is because it pisses me off when people ask or assert things that are clearly answered in the video.
I know you’re talking about selections, that’s why it’s pissing me off.