there doesn’t ‘need’ to…
its juts better, it works…
maybe when there’s no stupid people that take advantage of there not being a gobvt to hurt other lives that are obviously more valuable than their own cause they are smarter and contribute, and people learn what works and what doesn’t and are noble…there won’t need 2 b one…
so far… there needs to b a govt.
COOPERATIVE…
i didn’t think u knew that word…
can u be sincere and admit that that word doesn’t mix wit you? for what u said in your other trheads… you are a walking contradiction.
I smell some ad hominem going on.
It is true that statements of a person may contradict their statements elsewhere. It may discredit character to be inconsistent in appeals. But we can also consider each thread to be a “unit” of reasoning. I may tell you that a pen is blue in one thread, and then that the same pen is red in another thread. My intentions may still have a legitamete purpose in both threads.
When I see a person contradict themself in the same thread, then I’m ready to play the contradictions card for all it’s worth . . . if I feel like it.
yeah, but when criticizing a moral system, his moral system proposal has to make sense…
and he is trying to propose a moral system or criticize the current one in his threads…
so thats y i say he contradicts himself… wich is the same as saying he is a walking contradiction, but the later sounds ad hominem, and the former one doesn’t.
so i comited ad hominem…sorry, but now i say, joker contradicts himself, now i don’t comit ad hominem…
Criticizing somthing doesn’t always mean there is a moralist position.
One can criticize somthing out of dislike, because someone views somthing to be irrational, destructive, or nonsensical.
To be frank I am tired of you following me around in every thread spewing out this stuff.
A question for everybody.
Why does a group always imply hierarchy?
Even amongst chaos there can be mutual cooperation.