My Belief for more then one type of Religion

Philosophy Forums Religion and Spirituality
1

I believe that Jesus was a typical “white mans” wish to be as non-discriminatory as possible. Like say for example whites have always had the power in history from swords, knights in armor, to guns. Either way look at the way “whites” primarily always had one lifestyle that influenced their beliefs, money. And everyone wishes to be fair, just, and non-discriminatory to see things from anothers point of view. Like Jesus never judged, obviously thinking about all the things that could of led to that persons position in life.
&
Then look at Martin Luther King Jr. He made stereotypes obviously wanting equal laws for blacks. But look at the way he did it, being as non-discriminatory as he could be unless someone stereotyped first in my eyes. But how could you be not like that looking at a African-Americans past (slavery). Thats why I labeled him as a “black-Jesus,” in a report I did for school.

Protestantism - An excuse to crime against others whose belief is not like yours. By saying something like “It was in the name of God,” when who will deny someone for just believing in Gods eyes?? No one, when you instead would be persecuted against for bashing someone who says they do it in Gods eyes. But of course no ones dumb enough to do something that radical, like killing saying its in Gods name or you’d be looked at as crazy. Because how many people talk to God?? Not even John Edwards (my guess) from watching his show talking to your average joe. (Peoples whose ancestors came during the Revolution. White women with the empowered but put down might mess up their thinking, like how they dress up as sluts to impress others just to lower their self image)

Muslim - Believe Jesus is not Gods kid. To me its because he was non-discriminatory, but look at it from their point of view. Have their lifestyle been to the point where they need to be grateful. Being grateful is when you don’t stereotype against others knowing how your life has been, and knowing they wouldn’t like it. Because if you care for others not many can hate you/being grateful. And they believe to me, that their version of Jesus will place their thinking of gratefulness to others like Jesus did. Something like 9/11 almost did, making us humble/grateful for human life.

Christianity - Jesus taught to be as non stereotypical as possible. But can you, when in history Europeans have always been in power and not needing to worry about being put down. Therefore not needing to worry about seeing anothers point of view. To me Jesus just had the thinking of the first white/European who wasn’t discriminatory, when wouldn’t you think the so called “Gods kid” would use it to his advantage putting others down like Kings do??

Buddhism - These people are grateful, alot. Would a rich European want their reincarnation to be poor?? Not really seeing how they want multiple kids to rule their kingdom. Reincarnation for these people is a metaphor (logic and reasoning) for wanting to see from anothers point of view completely, therefore being as non-discriminatory as possible seeing as how you see from someones who lifestyle is opposite of yours (like Jesus was).

^^^Examples for my belief.

Not all of these Religions races who mainly practice it. Like Buddhism you think Southeast Asian, Christian you think Europen, ect. Because every now and again you meet a Indian who may believe in the Christian faith. Just most of the race who mainly practiced the origin of the faith believe how the public eye percieve them to be. And from my thread, I believe the obvious believers want someone to base (basics of your thinking when it comes to certain things like Religion) their thinking off of to complete their Religions basic beliefs. Stuff like placing your logical reasoning on others is completely unintentional. Like how “I” believe you enter this 1st life physically then mentally (DNA strands, sperm egg, ect.), and your 2nd life enter it mentally then physically (Alzheimer’s, memory loss, ect.).

2

:confused:

you need to clarify what your point is. i have no clue, this thing goes nowhere. do you write papers in school that look like this? nobody is going to able to read your stream of conciousness except for you.

you need to make a structure. define your thesis, then define what each supporting piece of evidence has to do with the thesis, then give the evidence. what you have here appears to be a big pile of unconnected evidence with no thesis of any kind. i have no idea what you are trying to say.

3

ugh… i agree with Future… i feel dirty

4

You feel dirty because you read his post? I’d believe that.

Indeed I must concur with FM, there are rules to writing essays…and Mr. Arm here tends to throw those rules out the window.

5

I expressed the basic thoughts to why I believe theres more then just 1 religion. Do you people come up with new philosophies like mine that could sound logical, and reasoning?? Not exactly.

If philosophy was all logic. There would be no one like Albert Einstein creating new ideas with his reasoning for his own thoughts. But the very basics for his ideas was based off of past logical ideas that also had reasoning for why they believed in what they studied.

What I noticed is that almost all of you just have the logic when it comes to new ideas. Trusting just the logic/obvious won’t let you even begin to understand new ideas.

6

you see that number by my name? ive written over a thousands things here. some of them before you got here. you should read them, youll learn a lot, a LOT. even though im a pretty bad writer at times.

how about, instead of could, make it do. then perhaps youll get respect. if your ideas arent sound, logical and reasoning, they dont exist as far as anybody but yourself is concerned. i dont like your main idea because i have no clue what it is.

the reason why we dont understand you is not because we are trusting just the logic, its because you are not writing in a coherent manner. you really need to read my first post again. seriously, im not trying to put you down, im trying to pick you up.

the fact that you are higher and mightier than even i am :astonished: should make me laugh. but its too sad for that. stop doing drugs for a long time.

7

  1. I’ve seen your work. Your posts depends on other peoples book work. Basically you depend on stuff, and write stuff anyone else could do. Did philosophers exactly copy others?? Nope, they reasoned with themselves why ones logic could be wrong.

  2. Did you see Plato’s personal journal?? Nope, and for all you know it could have been chicken scratch to everyone else. But its his ideas who many people loved.

8

golden arm, I have a question for you…

Can you name one person in this whole forum who likes you or the things you say? If not, then that should show you something that you have overlooked recently.

9

adherents.com/adh_phil.html

^^^Did those people, do you know cared for being liked for their persona?? I don’t know, and you don’t know. Do you think I care for being criticized for my ideas on philosophy?? Nope, this isn’t the real me, just me on philosophy.

10

Dude, even your signature is long and pointless.

11

The link you posted gave no relevance whatsoever to the topic. Which brings me to the important part of this response. You SHOULD care if you’re criticized, especially for your philosophy, because criticism ruins one’s reputation, which correlates with recognition. If you are criticized too much, which you are, you generate a bad reputation for yourself, and that means that people won’t listen to what you say. Don’t you see? If you ruin yourself, there will be no reason to post your philosophy on this site because no one will bother to pay attention to it, and when you do post, your bad reputation will preceed you and everyone will know that you have posted something that is not worth their time.

12

You criticize me for having new ideas based on religion, and its solely based on philosophical ideas. When I bring up these philosophers and their religion based reasonings, and logic disguising it.

Anyway…

You continue to go in my thread, but you say basically you hate my ideas. This thread can have 0 replys, ans just 99 views. Meaning others may read it. To fix their own logic and reasoning by adding or subtracting, even never add my ideas in this thread with theirs (or yours). Anyways does us better. By seeing ridiculous stuff you’ll stop thinking of remotely, or adding if your interested. Anywho, if you dislike “new” ideas, where I’m from you just don’t even bother to respond. And that says enough about how you people feel, by not responding.

13

What new ideas? Based on what religion? Answer me these questions and then your respect will increase. Fail to do that, and I will conclude you have nothing original to offer to this forum.

Again I ask, what ideas?

14

Every religion. How they were created from the idea to be like a even better Jesus. For the mindstate to be perfectly non-discriminatory at the right times. Because how can you dislike someone who doesn’t stereotype perfectly?? Hard for anyone to hate on him/her.

The idea I came up with…Saying the reason for multiple religions. In my eyes. To try to become a Jesus figure of sorts. Perfectly non-discriminatory, but look at how Muslims look at it. How can you be perfectly non-discriminatory when Jesus was white, and Christiananity’s main threshold was Europe; but your of a completely different background, and naturally thinking on being non-discriminatory. That to me is the reason why in the Qur’an, they believe in the second coming of Jesus. To be perfectly non-discriminatory, except when tempted to, thats why they believe in the Jihad, to kill those who commint crime against you to free yourself of the hate.

15

So your “new” idea is to combine all the good aspects of all religions into one? You should do your homework more often, there already is one. It’s called Bahai’ism. If you want to be the new Jesus, there are two main things you have to do:

  1. Start talking in a manner that makes sense. People won’t listen to you if you talk jibberish all the time.

  2. Contend with Future Man for the position of The New Jesus…

16

[quote="golden arm"Your posts depends on other peoples book work. Basically you depend on stuff, and write stuff anyone else could do. Did philosophers exactly copy others?[/quote]

this is really interesting. i dont read philosophy. i dont know what they say, therefore i cant copy them. i see myself as completely original in everything i say. maybe you just dont understand what im writing. or maybe i just so happen to be as great as the famous philosophers and it looks like im copying them since i was able to come up with their ideas. boy im great.

maybe you just dont have any way of criticising me so you use the blanket statement that would most likely criticise somebody.

look gold, stop thinking that you are being persecuted for your originality. read our posts, we are telling you that your ideas are incomplete. look at me and sage when we criticise somebody else. we actually REFER TO the information in their posts. with you, all we are able to do is say that we dont understand. over and over again everybody posts on your threads saying ‘what are you talking about’

when people do that on my threads, i re-explain my ideas in a different, slower, more explanatory way. all you do is claim that we are wrong. nobody has ever refered to information in your post when they respond because nobody is ever able to figure out what you are saying. THATS why all posts are the way they are, not because we hate you. seriously, i yearn to give you a respectful response. please give me an opportunity.

17

Bahai’ism, never met anyone in my lifetime of NYC visits who practice’s that.

Do I necessarily criticize a person as harsh as Future Man?? And I have read Future Mans only recent work. It all seems just re-wording that of old logic/book smarts, and not venturing out with his own original ideas like I tend to do. I just thought I could invoke others to do what I do…find new ideas by reasoning with past logic, like this thread telling myself why there might be more then one religion.

18

…and your point is? Are you saying you don’t recognize the existence of a belief structure if you’ve never met someone of that belief??

Yes.

Have you now…?

Uhm…yeah…right.

19

Cute new sig, FM. :laughing: No wonder G-Dub is so misunderestimated, assuming that quote is legit.

20

The quote is legit…for two reasons…

  1. I made his sigs…

  2. That quote ranked number one of the 2004 Bushisms…

Never assume…always ascertain.