Jupiter123 wrote:
All matter is made up of spinning electromagnetic particles with N and S poles.
The 4 off possible interactions between 2 electromagnetic particles is NN,NS,SN,SS
NN and SS interactions repel.
NS and SN interactions attract.
Attractive and Repulsive force absolutes are the only two forces that you require to explain science.
So you are saying that the attractive and repelling forces of these poles is electromagnetic. What do you say about electrons then? They have only a charge of -1, yet two poles: North and South.
And what do you mean by the 4 “off” interactions? Are there “on” interactions?
Jupiter123 wrote:
The above 4 off force interactions are balanced out between all particles which make up all matter by the balanced PHILOSOPHICAL formula N/S=N/S
So what does it mean for these particles to “balance out” as opposed to “cancel out”? Are you trying to explain why matter at the macroscopic level is neutral in terms of electromagnetic charge? So all the pushes and pulls at the level of particles balance out (but don’t cancel) at the macroscopic level to give us neutral matter?
Jupiter123 wrote:
This is what holds all matter together.All matter vibrates.
So what is gravity then? Is that also an electromagnetic force? Are all but a few N/S and S/N interactions cance—er—balanced out in all matter, leaving the few that didn’t quite get balanced in one chunk of matter to attract the few that didn’t quite get balanced in another chunk of matter? And if so, why, out of all the remaining unbalanced interactions, couldn’t similar poles from each chunk of matter face each other so as to repel each other?
Jupiter123 wrote:
The spin speed of particles determines how much particles interact with other particles.i.e the FREQUENCY of the vibrations.
When two particles vibrate in this manner they emit electromagnetic energy waves (HEAT).
So hold on, you need two particles interacting to emit EM waves? According to conventional science (you know, the one invented by Santa), a particle can emit EM waves just by losing energy. The common example they give is an electron that drops from a higher state in its orbit around an atomic nucleus to a lower state, thereby giving off some energy in the form of an EM wave (and perhaps spinning slower). Are you saying this is an interaction between the electron and the protons of the nucleus? Meaning that all electron South poles would be facing inward and all proton North poles would be facing outward (or visa-versa)?
Jupiter123 wrote:
The physical body in which we reside is a MACHINE.It picks up the energy waves emitted from vibrating matter.
These energy waves contain binary data specific to the matter type.All matter vibrates at different frequencies.
The physical body machine converts these analogue waves of energy into digital binary electrical signals.
With the exception of a few terms, this aligns perfectly with what I understand of mainstream science.
Jupiter123 wrote:
The physical body machine is programmed with binary software.
We are given data from the world in the form of experiences. We learn from this data/experience and program ourselves with perspectives, attitudes, narratives, moral values, and so on. I still don’t know why you insist on calling it “binary” as that term doesn’t quite accurately describe how neurons process information. What does the word “binary” do for you? Do you need the brain to function exactly like a computer? It can be a computer without necessarily being binary, you know.
Jupiter123 wrote:
You are not the physical body machine because you interpret electromagnetic energy waves emitted from vibrating matter.
← Does this have something to do with your psychological hierarchy? self → awareness → consciousness → thoughts [automated & manual] → emotions. Self appears at the top of the hierarchy, and the body appears (where?) at the bottom? Is it the interpreting of EM waves that sets me apart from my body, which is only receiving/processing EM waves? In my experience, I’m not interpreting anything when I perceive (for example) EM waves of 450 THz as red. I simply see red. Something below my level of consciousness may be interpreting neural signals coming from 450 THz EM waves as red and offering that interpretation up to my consciousness, but I don’t feel like I’m interpreting anything. →
Science is simple to understand gib….reality science that is…not mainstream cognitively biased atheistic Santa Science which is all made up nonsense.
← Your theory may be simple, but the difficulty usually lies in the transition from one (possibly more complex) theory to another. People will expect a lot to be explained, to understand how all the complexities of their theories can be accounted for by your theory. →
As you are residing within a vibrating physical body it makes perfect sense that you will experience this vibration at the consciousness level.
Experience it as what?
or 
?