Why doesn’t it? What does it sound like to you?
For me everything I have stated falls into the category of anarchism rather nicely.
You clearly haven’t read much anarchist philosophy.
I think he has, I just think he’s not really advocating anarchism.
Actually I have. Show me where my views don’t match up to anarchism in what I have said here in this thread.
The same goes to Stoic also. Show me.
m.dictionary.com/d/?q=anarchist
Uumm, hon you are making a state/government, thats not very anarchyish. I am not disrespecting what you are doing, I am saying there is a wrong label.
I suppose it’s always possible he read it and didn’t understand it. Anyway, this manifesto is something to look forward to, if he ever finishes it…
He seems to be advocating some form of Tribalist, Luddite, Racialist, Decentralized Democracy.
I feel it needs to be said, at least once for very good reasons… don’t execute anyone. Don’t mutilate anyone. I know some groups, such as the Amish and the Hutterites, are communal to varying degrees and so exile people, but I need to stress this, don’t execute anyone, and don’t mutilate anyone. Also recommend not doing the extensive thieving, but in relationship to killing, fuck… baby steps, let’s just not kill.
And no, you may not call me as a character witness in your trial… I don’t care how impressive the summons, I’m fleeing in the opposite direction, and if they capture me to testify for or against you, I’m just going to keep muttering that juries have the right to convict you under whatever charge they choose, including the death penalty, despite the judges directives or the prosecutes charges.
This being said… Canadians are pushovers, and I am pretty such you can conquer Calgary- perhaps a move north is advise? Honestly, how much risk do those Canadian Mounties pose to you, they’ll hit their faces into branches if they follow you into the woods, and they red bright red coats, you can hold up for years waging a guerrilla war there, and it’s near by. Strongly encourage a move north, in the US- the cops and military is skilled from years of war… in Canada, they’ve been fighting beavers… so they are the wiser choice to fight against… plus they have like, over twice the territory of the US, and give up territory to groups all the time. The country is a joke, and so like- go there and rage.
They do make a decent whiskey, not great but, it’ll warm your belly.
The very definition of anarchy is voluntary societies that are decentralized revolving around community democracy in absence of a centralized governing force.
revolving around? Wrong words. Its not anarchism.
Oh come on that is a rather loose definition for a very variable system of “non” government, for example absolute anarchy is just the animal kingdom, where you survive by force of strength, and whether anything actually has any say depends on their ability to overpower you or anyone else. By the way when I say animal kingdom I am only not including human beings because they do not belong in it as they should know better. We are something much worse than animals in that sense. 
Welcome back btw.
Also, in Canada, there are no laws against invading Canada and conquering them, unless your a Canadian or member of a foreign state… but here, we’ll hose your ass down in Guantanamo for decades without trial. It makes alot more sense to do this stuff there, and not here- as your neither Canadian nor a member for a foreign state, being a anarchist tribalist. Canadians like this sort of thing, they’re a nation built of backstabbing their neighbors and being defeated, leading to mass migration, internal fracturing, and eternal defeat. Plus, American tax dollars don’t have to be wasted on chasing you down for breaking soda machines and then shooting the cop trying to arrest you, with the resulting gloomy manhunt in the end. I’m telling you, the Canucks are totally into this sort of shit.
But it really sounds more like a Minarchy than an Anarchy.
I.E. in the right circumstances it could actually function.
But I doubt it.
Also i usually can’t understand Contra-Nietzche half the time but I agree you should not try to do this in the U.S.
I hate secessionism and if anyone tries it, I’ll be among the ones that will oppose this by force.
And I don’t want to do that.
Lions,Apes,Elephants,Seals, Ants, Termites etc. Countless other animals have Hierarchies,their not Anarchys.
Absolute anarchy has no rules at all. I don’t mean that humans can perceive or do absolute anarchy only that it is something that cannot exist with sentience. What I should of said was perhaps that anarchy is somewhat anarchic but it is not defined by something like economy, or rules or anything else, it’s a broad field.
It’s Dumn.
Dumb ideas have never stopped philosophers before, why would it suddenly be a factor now?
(Thank you for not understanding me half the time, and understanding me the other half of the time.)