My View on Religion- Read and Comment

My View on Religion (Particularly Christianity)

I was raised to be Christian. Christianity is a religion. I think society created religion to cope with the inevitability of death and here is why.

We became intelligent over unimaginable lengths of time and evolved into what we are today. All animals evolve to become stronger. Animals that are strong tend to procreate more than animals that are weak because the opposite sex is attracted to dominant features (natural selection). So what makes humans stand out from the animal kingdom? Intelligence.
In the course of evolution over the billions of years earth has existed, our brains developed. In the meantime, other animals were developing physically to survive their environments. Animals became stronger, faster, bigger, changed skin color or fur color, grew the necessary body parts and lost the useless ones. Humans used our brains. We had evolutionary success in thinking our way to the top. Intelligence is the most important attribute of success on this planet. Since mankind used brains instead of brawn, we evolved to create tools, to build clothing to keep us warm, to build shelter to protect from the elements and to construct language to communicate ideas. As a result, we thrived. In our constantly evolving species, our genes did a wonderful job. As the stronger portion of humans reproduced (ie: the most intelligent portion), mankind passed down the genes that made them succeed – brainpower. The average human today is much smarter than the average human thousands of years ago. Imagine the intellectual difference between humans today and the humans who were originally enthralled by the discovery of fire.
So mankind evolves and becomes aware of everything. We finally amass the brain power to create language and talk to one another. In all of this development, along the lines, some intelligent person becomes aware of the complexity of life and asks “what are we here for?” Then, this person sees his family and friends and other humans dying all around him and becomes aware of death. This makes him and other humans terrified. With the development of the brain came the development of complex thought processes involving awareness of time and the inevitability that we don’t live forever. While mankind toiled its brains with these thoughts, primitive animals below humans go on living their lives instinctually – consuming and reproducing rapidly like advanced bacterial life – unaware of the complexities of life, death and time.
Mankind evolved the ability to communicate our emotions and feelings and ideas very specifically. Animals can still display emotion and happiness and discontent with each other, but by growling or purring or hissing. All the while, humans evolved from using grunts and grinding teeth to developing phrases with questions and answers to communicate. So tribes formed and people realized that teamwork is necessary to live a longer, more prosperous life – evolutionary success. Mankind, also being aware of death, started communicating the idea of, “I don’t want to die and neither do you. Don’t kill me and I won’t kill you”. Any animal on earth, if they had the intelligence to comprehend death, would learn to fear death, deduct reason and realize that organization keeps us alive. Humans are just the first animals to become this intelligent on earth.
So people eventually all come to the consensus that death is scary and no one wants to die. We form rules and laws to prevent death. We say “do not kill, or you will be killed yourself”. And people, fearing death, do not kill one another (generally speaking). So as laws and rules are concocted by early primitive governments, not everyone agrees on the rules. Anarchy eventually occurs and the would-be nation crumbles do to individual thoughts and a lack of teamwork. In history, nations-to-be always failed and governments and empires always collapsed due to one thing: people are different. So people in authority (charismatic, smart individuals), no longer able to rule over populations because their own ideas are rejected, use their brains to devise a plan that no intelligent creature would deny. The idea is religion, and it claims to help people control their fate after the approaching inevitability of death.
No matter how free-thinking and individualistic a person was, it was too scary to object the idea that an all-powerful God would casts you into hell for committing ‘sins’ (a.k.a. laws set up by government). Governments said “God laid out these commandments and if you don’t follow them, you will go to hell!” So when this idea was proposed, people no longer worried about going to prison or being beheaded for breaking laws, they were terrified of the idea that they would be cast into lakes of fire for eternity by an all-powerful God. So government virtually had the same control over people that “God” has. Church and state had become a single entity.
The laws created originally by humans (ex, don’t kill, don’t steal, don’t lie, do what your parents say) were now not just backed by words like “because I said so”, but by the untouchable words of “because God says so”. People were then born and taught to read and speak language, and along with this growth came the passing-on of Christianity (I am using Christianity as my example of religion because it is how I was raised) and other religions. Whether you are Islamic or Hindu or Jewish or Christian, your belief all depends on what you have been told.
If I were to stand up in front of my family and say “I think Christianity was created by mankind in efforts to make civilization more like-minded”, they would look at me like I am crazy. Being raised in a Christian family, I absolutely had no choice in my belief. When I asked questions pondering the multitude of other religions and the amount of people out there destined to go to ‘hell’ because they weren’t Christian, the response was always stupidly similar and simple. It tread along the lines of ‘God chose you’ or ‘its all God’s plan’ or ‘don’t believe what the devil is saying to you’. With evolved reasoning and intelligence and the ability to communicate our thoughts with pin-point accuracy, it is no wonder that mankind has the ability to create the massive snowball effect of cultism and brainwashing that is religion!
Now, I think Christianity has certainly been more of a benefit to civilization than a downfall. It teaches us to practice self control and humility. Without it, there is no way we would have developed the United States, for instance. We were founded as a nation ‘under God’. We do everything ‘under God’ and we are comforted by the thought that we are moral in fighting our wars because God is ‘on our side’. Well, the god Allah is on the other side of the pond saying to his followers, “kill those Christians in America and you will fulfill your Islamic purpose”. So of course the dominant Islamic population in the Middle East is going to do what their parents taught them and fight for Allah – it’s all they know, just like us.
So I write this, not to bash Christianity or any religion of the world, but to promote free-thinking. I used to dislike non-Christian people because I had too much fear in the God that mankind instilled in my head. Then, as I grew, I began to hate listening to non-Christians because I was afraid they were actually right. And as I grew to the age I am now, I realize that I was a drone of religion – the opiate of mankind. Once I realized this, I felt more empowered than I ever have. I freed myself from Christianity.

Very Good…
That was a well written essay.

Now that you have discovered the power of free thinking, prepare your self, because there is still a lot to know.

Regards,

Perhaps someday your “free thinking” will free you from the grip of intellectualism just as it freed you from the grip of dogmatism.

Then, perhaps, you will make your return to Christianity… Not that dumb, blinking variety you grew up with, but, well, a much more challenging form…

I am interested in learning about the bible because I think it communicates a lot of relevant messages, but I would like to meet someone who is on the same page as me in regards to a possibility of higher intelligence. I am open-minded to any ideas. The essay I wrote was simply a reflection of frustration I’ve been feeling and I wanted to share my feelings by writing.
But what do you mean by a much more challenging form of Christianity? Like theological studies?

Higher intelligence is great, but greater still is a heart bursting with love. If I cold paraphrase Paul, God’s folly confounds the wisdom of the Greeks

You, I daresay, have become enamored by the Greeks who privilege intelligence/reason.

I simply mean something other than the varieties that get spoon-fed to children. You know, the pre-packaged forms of religion… The teachings of Christ (and not only of Christ but the Biblical and other religious traditions in general) open a space wide enough for free thinking minds to think to their heart’s content. There is no end to the challenge these texts offer us. Instead of feeling disdain for them, free thinking minds should be excited by what they offer.

(I’m not saying you feel disdain towards the texts, but it’s not hard to find people who share your predelictions that do. They think religious texts stop thinking rather than excite it…)

I have some problems with the central thesis of the essay: that man created religion to cope with the fear of death. I agree that this thesis makes intuitive sense at first glance. I also think that a compelling case can be built from this premise (such as you have done) when addressing modern religions. However, if that hypothesis were true then we would expect the role of the afterlife to play a central role in all human religions. Right? And this is where the problems start since a well developed afterlife is a relatively recent phenomenon in religious movements. In older religions the afterlife is either undefined or very poorly defined (and usually not terribly comforting either!). Now, I do think people like that aspect of religion and enjoy it (while I have problems with memetic theory, I think it offers a useful model and we can agree that the afterlife meme is very successful and adds a lot to the appeal of religions). Granted, there are outliers to this analysis. For example, the Ancient Egyptians had a highly developed afterlife. But look at the others. At best, you’ve got an ancestor cult going on. But where those ancestors are and what they are doing is pretty undefined. If you don’t tend to them, they’re gonna get you, but other than that it is a mystery. Other versions are simply poorly defined (the Jewish afterlife would be a good example here) or unpleasant (Greco-Roman). In Hinduism there isn’t an afterlife either, not really. Just life. And even that is a later addition to Hinduism, the oldest Vedic elements we have deal with rituals for appeasing gods and interacting with nature, not with the afterlife. If fear of death were the defining element of religious belief, you’d think it would play both a larger and an earlier role in the history of religion!

I think the origins of religion can be found in a mixture of the human capacity for pattern-forming, an anthropocentric worldview, and ignorance. You can still seem examples of this sort of totemism with things like “lucky socks” and other fetishes people carry with them in a misapplied attempt at identifying cause and effect. This naturally lead to the conclusion that there was something/someone who was arbitrating these matters, which creates the gods. “The branch fell and hit my head because the tree spirit was angry with me. But the tree spirit wasn’t angry with Boltok because he wasn’t wearing wooden shoes.” From there basic human hierarchical tendencies took over. As the old adage goes “knowledge is power” so the people in power monopolized the correct answers to religious questions. That is also why in most religions there isn’t a separation between church and state because such a concept is inconceivable. The secular leaders are the religious leaders. The only cases where you do get a separation is where there was some wacky variable that created a rift between these two elements and even then the separation is never complete.