I think I made that pretty clear in my last post, turtle. Unfortunately, in terms of the National debt, it can’t be immediate and won’t be forever. There are times when deficit spending can be beneficial, even necessary, in order to build up a good credit rating and maintain the flow of money. The problem, obviously, comes when there’s too much reliance on deficit spending.
I’ll try to keep ranting down. People tend to forget the current administration’s immediate concern was to meet the obligations President Bush had put into motion as Lame Duck agreements, along with the two wars. President Obama bailed out the car manufacturing companies (which, I believe, have repaid the Government, with interest) and lending and insurance corporations, with some degree of success. Not to have done anything would have affected global economy. Despite that, Global economy was, and still is, affected.
A lot of this came about because the American people, following the example of the Federal government (?), went into too much private debt. IMO, the public didn’t realize the intricacies of credit card lending, mortgage lending, etc.–nor had they ever been taught thrift. I would think that the majority of people with the most private debt is under 50, but I haven’t googled it. How does that relate to the Federal debt? Exact corollaries can’t be drawn, but i think there are similarities. President Reagan raised the debt ceiling at least 5 times to maintain a cash flow that, otherwise, wouldn’t have been there. President Clinton closed down Government for a day and juggled figures around to show a reserve that may or may not have been there. (It all depends on how you look at it.)
President G. H, W. Bush was inept, imo, I have no idea why he was elected other than he rode the Reagan wave. Reagan was elected because Jimmy Carter was inept. Jimmy Carter was elected because of the disgrace of the Nixon era. is there a pattern emerging here? Is the American public not being led to vote using the same methods used to get them to buy?
But I’m trying to break this down into possibly digestible pieces that may just be too many to appreciate in one bite.
Re-think and re-train are two of my other suggestions. Re-think the United States’ position in the World economy. Which do we take care of first–other countries or ourselves? My nephew was in the Afghan War and it’ll probably take him a long time to fully recover. He enlisted because he said he believed what President Bush, II, said; but what exactly did George, II, say about Afghanistan? Anyone remember?
I really don’t want to go into the various reasons for that war; its been discussed to death. For anyone interested, here’s a link to a site I received from an on-line friend–an Afghani free-lance journalist:
hadihairan.com/2011/07/afgha … hotos.html
Given Hadi’s photos, is it up to outside countries to interfere with Afghanistan? Or is it primarily up to Afghanistan to decide how they want to be ruled? Hadi obviously wants countries to continue Charlie’s War and I do understand. He sees his country devastated by generations of war; but, if the outside countries no longer have the money to wage Afghanistan’s war, what can be done?
The Iraqi war, as I understand it, was supposed to be in response to Saudi Arabia’s suggestion that it might consider accepting the Euro as oil currency, rather than the US dollar. It was meant to be a quick in-and-out show of American strength. It’s also gone on for almost a decade–that’s a really quick in-and-out.
Now both reasons for both wars no longer exist. Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein no longer exist. Isn’t it time to stop wars that do nothing more, really, than drain us of money and lives?
Re-train, America! I read today that most of the available jobs in my state require technological training and experience, rather than service training and experience. And it makes sense. Given technology, does anyone really need a secretary? We do need nurses and teachers–and a lot of men do well at both.
Think about it.