Aside from the esotericisms (deep, historical, philosophical, scientific knowledge), what wisdom is there the average person does not acquire by the age of twenty?
Records his own mental voyage; ragardless of ignorance …; for clarity of thought and the proper order of ideas (alignment) should necessarily produce a fearless eloquence.
No more certain a signal a person is not worth the energy required to speak to than the tendency to repeat something they’ve merely overheard and assert it as their own finding. And at no other time is this tendency made more apparent than when a person is wrong.
Should one come to an identical conclusion as another who came before, it is not necessary to deduce an irrelevancy regarding the latter’s findings. - Philosophical truths are not found or read but achieved.
What I write is both serious and silly, fact and fiction. Not because I have not taken it seriously, not because I consider it fiction, but because it doesn’t matter. What a reader takes from a text is always only what they bring with them. Wisdom speaks to those who are prepared to hear it. If what I write communicates with a reader, it will have been a result of their opening their own doors to communication, a removal of their indifference to just how important their time is, and that, having chosen to sit and read, having chosen to occupy their mind with mine, there is but one task: understanding.
How does existence (or the nature of our existence, to phrase it another way) differ from what we ‘are’? Truth and intelligence are mere elements, factors, portions of existence … You’re arguing the heart and lungs are more complex than the body.