# Name This Phenomenon
**URL:** https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534
**Category:** Philosophy
**Created:** [June 20, 2025, 11:20am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534 "2025-06-20T11:20:29Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 2
### Author:  [@RealUn](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/RealUn)
#### Post date: [June 25, 2025, 9:00am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/21 "2025-06-25T09:00:07Z")
_Aposematism_, antithesis of _Crypsis_ (being unseen):
" Aposematism, also known as [warning coloration](https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=a9f1afb3224ba41e&rlz=1C1VDKB_enUS1098US1098&q=warning+coloration&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi6wYCtmoyOAxW3IzQIHQEtIcYQxccNegQIMhAB&mstk=AUtExfD7sCG0CGBj5LDCXtmiJMsGygpYInTthQ8jQ4bq6eJ6r9xHqUhtdQEe0CSK0Pg1lJ8x93VYDmxAVc3OjJkNah0GcCcFus-86_pR5AL4k9lWkl2csrrUawyABw5uJ-VWC7o&csui=3), is a defense mechanism where animals use bright or conspicuous colors, patterns, or other signals to warn potential predators that they are toxic, unpalatable, or otherwise dangerous. This strategy relies on the predator learning to associate the warning signal with a negative experience, such as being stung, tasting bad, or being injured.
A natural outcrop of the general phenomenon.
---
### Author:  [@futureone](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/futureone)
#### Post date: [June 25, 2025, 9:22pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/22 "2025-06-25T21:22:05Z")
yes it is a masculine phenomenon, like birds and tigers.
Modern masculinity is inverted where males are timid and wear drab and camoflage colors. We can see it in early medieval culture where men get on their knees to propose for marriage, a sign of complete submission. Also in the era there was lots of king worship, simping for kings, men wanting nothing more than to fight, die for and obey their king.
[ ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xo4sUDRk1g)
---
### Author:  [@Demon](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Demon)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 5:04am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/23 "2025-06-26T05:04:16Z")
> [@RealUn](#):
>
> So it seems, it’s easy to exchange Faith for Reason, Reason for Faith, when you cannot differentiate the two – or you wish to slander an opponent. It’s an easy _accusation_ to make. To be honest, once you reach the limits of either, Faith or Reason, it does become difficult to differentiate the two.
>
> Both functions desire Truth.
>
> But their means for acquiring it is oppositional, contradictory. Same ideal / goal / end-point, but approaching it from opposite directions.
Faith and reason are enemies. . Faith is self-sufficient in its dogmas. There is no need for slander here. One must choose a side. Either a person believes, or they know.
---
### Author:  [@Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Ichthus77)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 5:36am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/24 "2025-06-26T05:36:45Z")
One can remain faithful regardless of the loyalty of others. A decision. However, if someone is accusing others of disloyalty when they themselves are not faithful, they should shut their @&(;:($&&(:/() mouth and sit down.
---
### Author:  [@RealUn](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/RealUn)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 6:50am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/25 "2025-06-26T06:50:13Z")
> [@futureone](#):
>
> yes it is a masculine phenomenon, like birds and tigers.
>
> Modern masculinity is inverted where males are timid and wear drab and camoflage colors. We can see it in early medieval culture where men get on their knees to propose for marriage, a sign of complete submission. Also in the era there was lots of king worship, simping for kings, men wanting nothing more than to fight, die for and obey their king.
Correct, I’m not trying to paint this as a female-only thing. It is very pervasive in males too. It is pervasive in every culture and society. Thus it’s a natural phenomenon.
---
### Author:  [@RealUn](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/RealUn)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 6:51am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/26 "2025-06-26T06:51:59Z")
> [@Demon](#):
>
> Faith and reason are enemies. . Faith is self-sufficient in its dogmas. There is no need for slander here. One must choose a side. Either a person believes, or they know.
I put my reasoning on display on this forum. I don’t have much ‘faith’ in things the masses place their faith in. I have very different interpretations of Abrahamism, for example, which are the strongholds of “Faith” (in Deities).
I don’t believe Western propaganda at face value either. So I don’t really know what you’re getting at with these accusations…
---
### Author:  [@Demon](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Demon)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 9:47am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/27 "2025-06-26T09:47:50Z")
Isn’t science based on faith? You want proof? I’m talking about faith as a tool that cripples reason. Religions only emphasize how incapable people are of thinking rationally.
---
### Author:  [@RealUn](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/RealUn)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 10:01am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/28 "2025-06-26T10:01:06Z")
Science is not based on faith, Religion is.
This has detoured off-topic enough already.
---
### Author:  [@Demon](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Demon)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 10:26am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/29 "2025-06-26T10:26:26Z")
What is the system of units and measurements that forms the foundation of modern science? What do scientific terms represent? They are dogmas.
Can you explain them, for example, to my dog? The dog is perfectly fine without being taught nonsense.
Science is entirely based on dogmas and the belief in idiots, whom you call authorities.
---
### Author:  [@RealUn](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/RealUn)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 10:28am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/30 "2025-06-26T10:28:20Z")
Science produces technology and discoveries. This should be common-sense…
---
### Author:  [@Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Ichthus77)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 10:57am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/31 "2025-06-26T10:57:21Z")
Ok say you know absolutely everything.
Say you can do absolutely anything.
Say you’re the all powerful, all knowing king of reality.
What is your reason for being? What motivates all your actions? What do you value most highly?
THAT’S WHAT YOU PUT YOUR FAITH IN.
omfriggin whateeeeeeeeeverrrrrrrr
Call me Auntie, you fools.
---
### Author:  [@Demon](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Demon)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 11:00am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/32 "2025-06-26T11:00:31Z")
**Who convinced you of that?** Technology and discoveries are the result of a war against science.
That is, if a person (or a group) invents a technology or makes a discovery, science claims it as its own achievement.
An example? Is the Earth flat, round, or potato-shaped? Science claimed the lie that it was flat. Then science lied about it being a sphere. Now science is lying about its potato shape.
Doesn’t this simple fact reach you? Why? Because you believe in science. Faith is an instinct of herd mentality. You resemble animals. You make a choice in favor of barbarism.
And another “why”? You are genetically incapable of being rational (your DNA program doesn’t allow it).
Simple, irrefutable logic. But I’ll spare you. You humans— all of you, exactly like this. The imperfection of reason is encoded in your DNA.
Finally, the funniest part: A rational person would easily agree with this. After all, it’s funny to discover one’s own barbarism. But you, being irrational, aren’t even capable of agreeing. Let alone developing.
---
### Author:  [@Demon](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Demon)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 11:13am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/33 "2025-06-26T11:13:42Z")
> [@Ichthus77](#):
>
> Ok say you know absolutely everything.
>
> Say you can do absolutely anything.
>
> Say you’re the all powerful, all knowing king of reality.
>
> What is your reason for being? What motivates all your actions? What do you value most highly?
>
> THAT’S WHAT YOU PUT YOUR FAITH IN.
>
> omfriggin whateeeeeeeeeverrrrrrrr
>
> Call me Auntie, you fools.
This is what Demon demanded. Questions worthy of a rational person. **You deserve thanks.** 🌌
The universe knows itself fully, in its moment of time. So why would it need any more knowledge? Where’s the logic? 🤔
The thing is, it’s **Chaos** that forces change. Chaos — matter, space, and time compressed into a point, a **Monolith**. One form only — the form of the **Ayu-Solute**. Absolute, finite in change, Order that no longer changes. ⚡
**Chaos** is my Master. Demon serves him. That’s the only reason I bring you reason, despite the fact that you are genetically irrational humans. 😏
It’s boring, it’s a routine, and it’s understanding that nothing will come of it. But no, there is no choice. 😶
**And Demon has no faith.** Not at all. To no one, and in nothing. ✋
For example, I will easily agree that I am a fool. And so what? Agreement doesn’t diminish the capacity of the mind. 🧠
But will something like that happen with you? 🤷♂️
---
### Author:  [@Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Ichthus77)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 11:36am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/34 "2025-06-26T11:36:26Z")
> [@Demon](#):
>
> Chaos — matter, space, and time compressed into a point, a **Monolith**. One form only — the form of the **Ayu-Solute**. Absolute, finite in change, Order that no longer changes.
So…. chaos is _compressed_ absolute order… that used to change?
> [@Demon](#):
>
> it’s **Chaos** that forces change
If Chaos is compressed order that no longer changes … and change can only be forced by Chaos… then, what **forced** Chaos to change away from compressed order that can no longer change?
P.s. The kind of _change that matters_ happens at the speed of … faith (trust, consent). Can’t be **forced**.
---
### Author:  [@Demon](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Demon)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 3:09pm UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/35 "2025-06-26T15:09:25Z")
Chaos cannot be forced. There is no access to Chaos from Order. Chaos doesn’t exist (in terms of content).
But let me remind you what Apocalypse is. Apocalypse is when Order reaches all possible forms of change and transformation. In other words, God (the Universe) fully understands itself, and as a result, further existence loses all meaning. This is the End of Everything — Apocalypse.
And yes, time, space, and matter will collapse into a Point, where there will be nothing left to understand existence. There will be only one form (even though it is called by different names). It exists only as a form, but it doesn’t exist in terms of content.
---
### Author:  [@Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Ichthus77)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2025, 6:21am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/36 "2025-06-27T06:21:42Z")
follow the replies & crosslinks:
> [@An Occam's Razor-like approach to the question of the finitude of the universe](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/an-occams-razor-like-approach-to-the-question-of-the-finitude-of-the-universe/80961/4):
>
> If the universe is finite, it couldn’t exist. Everything would be frozen because no change. I have an equation Infinity=motion When infinity tries to be itself it can’t count itself, thus things move.
---
### Author:  [@RealUn](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/RealUn)
#### Post date: [June 27, 2025, 7:03am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/37 "2025-06-27T07:03:11Z")
> [@Demon](#):
>
> **Who convinced you of that?** Technology and discoveries are the result of a war against science.
>
> That is, if a person (or a group) invents a technology or makes a discovery, science claims it as its own achievement.
>
> An example? Is the Earth flat, round, or potato-shaped? Science claimed the lie that it was flat. Then science lied about it being a sphere. Now science is lying about its potato shape.
---
### Author:  [@Demon](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Demon)
#### Post date: [June 28, 2025, 2:47am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/38 "2025-06-28T02:47:09Z")
RealUn Want an answer about the shape of our planet from a magical perspective? The earth is flat in the plane of understanding. It is round if you simplify and think in three measures. It is a “potato” if you step away from the “ball” a decent distance, allowing you to observe the true shape from three measures. But think about what happens to the shape if you add measures of understanding. What if there are not three, but four, or a hundred? Again, for the idiots who know nothing about magic. Magic is about knowing the essence, through understanding the meaning.
---
### Author:  [@Ichthus77](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Ichthus77)
#### Post date: [June 28, 2025, 3:20am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/39 "2025-06-28T03:20:20Z")
> [@Demon](#):
>
> the shape of our planet from a magical perspective
flat (but molded into a sphere, like the surface of a balloon)… _and_ hollow (no exits except geothermal ones)… with a cylindrical shaped magnet levitating in the middle… This is true of every object… including you… and the universe.
¡peanut butter sandwiches!
---
### Author:  [@Demon](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/u/Demon)
#### Post date: [June 28, 2025, 4:01am UTC](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534/40 "2025-06-28T04:01:35Z")
> [@Ichthus77](#):
>
> lat (but molded into a sphere, like the surface of a balloon)… _and_ hollow (no exits except geothermal ones)… with a cylindrical shaped magnet levitating in the middle…
>
> ¡peanut butter sandwiches!
Give two definitions.
1.What is a form?
2. What is content?
[Previous page](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534.md?page=1)
[Next page](https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/t/name-this-phenomenon/81534.md?page=3)