Nature of existence- check this out

First id like to say hellooo evry1 - i love philosophy and people so i spose ive found a good place to post at last.

Ok i am going to attemp to prove that i don’t exist (as did Descartes).

Only he failed…

oh no shit i’m writing…Damn then i must exist!

unless…

You analise the nature of time.

If something does not always exist does it trully exist.
How about if you consider the fact that everything is happening at once
and time is an illusion?

Which raises the question; will i always exist?

I do really agree with DEZ on this one.

If the answer is YES i will exist forever than when my physical body ceases to operate and dies, what will continue to exist?

One of the greatest tools of philosophy is elimination.

So does my unphysical self (whatever that may be) require my physical body to survive?

the body needs air, water, food to grow primarily. and secondary needs.
the soul needs love, -since the physical body cannot adequatly sense love in its limited existence. IT CAN ONLY REFLECT IT.

I often think of existence as a traintrack body and soul- the two parrallel tracks joined and abridged by the mind.

So the mind is merely a bridge between the two. Or perhaps a magnifying glass that can only scrutinise one tiny thing at a time. Thats why philosophy is nothing without the subconcious expanse of knowledge that we access through calm relaxed rational thought. without it philosophy would be a mere scrutiny.

i hope i inspire some coments as i would be very interested in hearing some opinions- cool peace

any one thing partially exists unless that thing is everything, or nothing which both have complete existance.

It is a frequency of electromagnetic radiation

sorry thats inadequate- feel free to try again

Okay, red is a the electromagnetic frequency interval of ~480-405 Terahertz and the wavelength interval of ~ 625-740 nm. Any more questions?

Ok i respect your attempts but If i were to quote that to a blind child would that be sufficient? even if i put into words a child could understand… colour is indefinable, do you see my point.

The point i was making with that sentence;

“We all know what red looks like but who can define it adequatly”

Means we all have the answers inside but when we come to relate them to one another it often becomes confusing. yanowhatimean? Say two people see a car crash, they both see the same exact thing but if you were to question them both…