Negation of the axiom of choice and Evil

Negation of the axiom of choice and Evil

Beside the particular case of the axiom of choice
CC(2 through m), countable choice for sets of n elements
n=2 through m, there is the particular case where the whole
axiom is negated, no choice at all.

In “All things are numbers” in Logic Colloquium 2001, and in “About
the strength of Evil” in ASL Winter Meeting 2004 2005, I wrote
that the numbers of attributes of Evil are infinite sums and products
of integers.
If there is no choice at all, which is a standing valid case,
as I am changing my mind to include this case beside
CC(2 through m),the only infinite sums or products well defined
(existing) is the infinite sum 1+1+1+… which is equal to
aleph zero.

So, Evil is really restricted.

The case where the whole axiom of choice is negated is not a
parametric case.
We apply it to ethics.

Another way for clarification is the following :
Let us consider the infinite cardinal product XiAi Ai being sets of
attributes of Evil of size the same or different integers, without the
ai being urelements.
In some model of the negation of the axiom of choice, the product is
void.
So, the number of combined attributes of Evil is not like with the axiom
of choice an infinite product of integers (which is the cardinality of
the continuum), but 1+1+1+…(which is aleph zero).

As for the numbers of attributes of Good, I wrote in “All
things are numbers” in Logic Colloquium 2001 that they
are Dedekind cardinals.
A criticism that I am making to myself is that, in such a case,
attributes must be indistinguishable as urelements are.
Attributes would go like : Good, Good, Good, …
Adib Ben Jebara.

evil is a culturally defined term thus arbitrary-it is defined in opposition to good
it varyies between cultures
it is the product of dualistic thinking
it dont exist as an independent thing
it is man made and arbitrary

with out dualistic thinking it would not exist
ethics is an illusion so is evil so is good
both dont exist except in the minds of dualalistic thinkers

good can come from evil
and evil can come from good
so is evil really good if good things can come from it

as for the axiom of choice it is a rubbish axiom -see thread