- The concept of “God” could be posited realistically as “the juxtaposed superposition of all possible scenarios that have love as an outcome, manifested into one entity” – as JRR Tolkien put it, a “Lord of the Rings”.
This is derived from chaos. The possibility that our understanding of reality is a fabrication, and the possibilities of certain scenarios (be it space aliens; us unknowingly living in a computer-generated reality; a “super-government” misleading us into believing a false reality; etc… Descartes Demon essentially) all accumulate - in turn making the odds very low that reality actually exists the way we think it does.
Now, if our existence is hypothetically maintained by some unknown power, then the only logical reason that unknown power would maintain our existence would be out of some form of love. And if there were ever an unknown power that maintained our existence out of the desire to torture us or feed off of our suffering, they would become a huge dot on the “radar screen” so to speak for other unknown powers - a sort of “Jupiter” effect.
When calculating out the hypothetical existence of “greater powers”, it is fair to assume that the principle holds true “there is always a bigger fish” – meaning that a greater power would also have some greater power governing them that they are unaware of.
With all possibilities juxtaposed – a “loving existence” has a much greater possibility of forming than other scenarios. “There is power in love” and this is always a desire of any mind, even after no more power is needed.
- “God’s” manipulation of reality -as well as any belief system- has to coincide with a reality viewed with empirical science. Essentially, this means that all belief systems are true given the context of the time-period they were introduced.