New Footage Shows Renee Good Intentionally Blocked Traffic

Social Forums Current Events
61

I agree with this. You can tell by the way he yelled ‘fucking bitch’ after he had shot her.

‘‘Jonathan Ross may be a misogynist, intoxicated by the authority imbued upon him, and a reckless hothead, but here’s a behaviorist’s view on the single thing that made him lose control and set him off to shoot Renee Good three times in the face. Believe it or not, it was her telling him it’s OK, she wasn’t mad at him and then turning the wheel to leave. That was her being in control, it was a statement about HER feelings, with HER as the subject, and driving away would have made that THE LAST WORD. He couldn’t handle that. To him, she was slighting his manhood by making his feelings subordinate, effectively saying she wasn’t afraid, and this caused his innate hatred for women to bubble up and overtake him. Shooting her was his way of saying - who has the last word now?’’

1 Like
62

.

..for all he knew, she might have had the intention of slamming her foot on the gas and swerving into him.

1 Like
63

Shooting her in the face while the vehicle is moving would have made that a far more likely scenario. And if that’s the case then why not shoot the tyres? Or just the windscreen on the passenger side? Judging by the video it likely caused her foot to slam down on the accelerator, endangering everyone nearby. Dead people don’t usually lift their foot to hit the break, or pull the handbrake. I suppose you didn’t bother to listen to what the expert said about it because it doesn’t suit your agenda.

64

.

65

Nothing is clear about any of those videos.

66

1000011553

it kind of looks like she is going to ram him with the corner of the car. Its unclear from the camera angle.

But you can tell the car is accelerating forward before she turns the steering wheel all the way.

If she actually wanted to avoid running into the guy she would have waited to turn the steering wheel all the way before acceleration.

1 Like
67

Its looks like she tried to run him over, and that he dodged and ran out of the way.

In my opinion she did try to run him over, but failed, was shooting her really necessary since he dodged out of the way anyway? Up to the law to decide that, in my opinion she did try to run him over.

She tried to run him over but only in a half-assed way. She was half-hoping he would just get out of the way, as I said about how she turns the steering wheel to avoid him but still accelerates before the wheel is turned.

In any case its a clear cut case of someone resisting arrest and accelerating on a foot pedal when a police officer is infront of them… nothing she did was legal at all. Im my opinion the policeman used unneccesary lethal force but that’s for a judge to decide.

1 Like
68

It actually shows her turning the wheels to the right, away from the idiot standing in front of a moving vehicle.

69

“Its looks like she tried to run him over, and that he dodged and ran out of the way”

I’ll tell you exactly what her brain did. First order was to go left because dude in front was most immediately in her vision… but then her brain recognized that third person approaching from her diagonal left and ordered the hands to bear hard right to avoid both people. Split second decisions that aren’t thought about.

70

Timestamp 5:50
“From Palestine to Mexico”
https://youtu.be/hDyOtI9ekXk?si=B7l4HH3yggklH6US&t=350

You realize that these Leftists are Pro-Palestine, Pro-Hamas, correct??

That’s who you support and defend, moron. Always took you for a Pro-Hamas type…

71

Now, everybody, watch and behold as @VictorMcCheeseEsq Vege does a complete 180… now she’s glad they’re dead.

OR, is Vege, finally, siding with the Hamas and Palestine, Leftists???

72

He did not dodge it like I said, but was ran over. I watched an Asmongod video and he was actually ran over, and shot her as he was being ran over. He never dodged it, it just looked like he dodged it because the car bumped into him.

Asmongod is correct about almost everything.

1 Like
73

‘Run’ over. Why do Americans have such shocking English? Communication is pretty fundamental to being human and having a functioning society. No wonder your country is such mess. You’ve messed up the laguage so much that no one knows what anyone means any more. If he was RUN over he would be squashed all over the road.

3 Likes
74

He was not run over. But people will interpret this whole mess in ways that align with their beliefs, even when the evidence says otherwise.

1 Like
75

Technically yes. He was “bumped into” by the car. In the video, if they say “run over” they mean bumped into.

76

From your AI lover: To “run over” something means to hit it with a vehicle (like a car) and drive over it

77

Very much true.

He was bumped into, not “ran over”, glad everyone is reaching a consensus reality now. When I said “ran over” what I meant was “bumped into”. I believe it is important for everyone to reach consensus reality.

The irony is that I was about to say the same thing, about how humans cannot seem to reach consensus reality (because of delusion) and you posted about it before I did. I guess I need to learn that exact, specific terminology is important, not merely the meaning that I assumed was shared consensus reality with the terminology.

She did not merely try to hit him, but succeeded in hitting him.

78

How do you know what she tried or intended to do?

79

When I said “merely” in this context, it was not explicitly meant to be defined as an “inclusive” merely.

It was not meant to imply that it equaled = “tried to run into him + running into him”.

It was meant as “running into him superceded the “tried to” part”. That running over him was of more importance than whether she tried to or not.

Its impossible to know what she had planned in her mind, but from the footage, she had the gas pedal going on, when an officer was in front of her car, that’s what we know.

In any other situation, the driver would be in the wrong, even if the driver made as an excuse such as “they weren’t even looking in front of them when they bumped into someone in front of them” or something.

Less so if the car was already moving at speed, such as they stopped to look at their phone and didn’t see the road in front of them, but in this scenario they were resisting arrest while surrounded by officers, then drive the car backwards, change gear to forwards then slam the gas pedal hard (perhaps also losing tire traction), while an officer is in front of them.

Any other scenario, there would be no argument if the driver was in the wrong, such as if a civilian was in front of the car and they slammed on the gas pedal like that, starting from a net velocity of 0 mph, and the excuse “the driver didn’t see what was in front of them” would not be likely to hold water.

So, for example, if a car is moving 40 mph down a road, they stop to look at a phone for a few seconds, then they run over a pedestrian accidentally, they would still go to jail but it would be more understandable than say, a car in a parking lot where a Civilian for some strange reason is standing in front of their car, but the Civilian is not threatening them, but perhaps the Civilian is a drunk man or something, then they floor the gas pedal onto the Civilian.

80

So pathetic. slkjdlsjk