For reason being saw the light that is consent violation is of degrees inseparable not or yes from Abrahanism, as the Buddhist placating seems socially processing toward a unified disindentifucation which is boring as hell, besides being a kind of fascist-egalitarian move
Besides kinds of socialistic approaches feign a disinterested intent to define different types of isms. Staying with the holy grail of the triangulated ways of approach correlating to the tripartite archeology of the brainmind.
And this timing warrants Kant-Heidegger, not to mention the Lotus Sutr’s Shakyamuni, , I think your presumption parellels the cynical poetically justified comic relief of the doubt that the great sceptic fired up.
Telling it: The birth of imagination sparked after the first time we remembered something incorrectly and realized (discovered) we could remember things wrong or different on purpose (leading to fiction in the arts), or right on purpose (leading to useful inventions & nonfiction in the arts)
Showing it: Genesis 1 through 3 and all the other creation/fall myths across cultures—their variations and similar cores.
So woke up one fine morning, now here, and thinks how to connect this here myth with Sartre’s nose, much less that of the underlying manifestation* concerning the dreamscape filled with miracles, with it’s ebbing winds of fire ?
But then we’re nearing epoche proportions all rhe way down what appears futile so why or why not make little difference .
‘politics of gaze’ - Foucault-Merleau-Ponty
What the heck?
(Optics, politics, identity, red flags, reflexive signifiers, technopolitical machinations, limited overreach, zones of safety and times when it can sea the white of their egged whites)
A non reflective response, or none, will self distract within a few hours/minures. /\
()()()
Validation of the above: a 51/49 chance in a world of certainty trumps a 99% probability against it!
