bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36908283
Most major newspapers in the US apparently gave declined to use a picture of Hillary Clinton winning the convention, preferring to use pictures of her husband, or Bernie Sanders, or the crowd.
The BBC, their American branch, is always extreme left, has decided this is evidence of sexism.
How the fuck do you arrive at that conclusion? Newspapers slap images of woman on their papers all the time. Hell, in England they tend to be nude a page or two in.
I think the real reason is, nobody fucking likes Hillary Clinton, even those vowing to vote for her… and newspapers are naturally attracted to what is exciting and sales. Nothing exciting at all about Hillary… an anticipation of horror and dread slowly saturating the public forba decade seeing the inevitable, her ‘turn’ to be the nominee, isn’t what sells news papers. People like Bill Clinton… he invokes a opposite feeling. Many like and feel sorry for Sanders, a Tragic representation of what happens to believers involved in corrupt party politics. Even the euphoria of the crowd is interesting… but Hillary plain and simply is not. The country is largely disgusted with her. Shoveling more Hillary down people’s throats, in a Democratic or Republican area, isn’t going to sell newspapers. Slapping pics of Gal Gadot dressed as wonder woman on the front will boost it. It isn’t a issue if feminism, but of having a snake on the cover everyone instinctively rejects at the gut level. We know her crimes, and her immunity to justice, and her own supports often struggle to accept the pill she offers… advancing the Democratic agenda, knowing at this point they have no choice but her.
Of course no damn newspaper wants such a twisted woman on the cover. Put jailbars in front of her, and say Elizabeth Warren is the nominee instead… then you will sell boatloads, in every district in every state. It isn’t a feminist problem, but a Hillary problem. People hating Hitler or Stalin aren’t Anti-Men, why is it everyone hating Hillary with general disgust automatically anti-feminist? She isn’t hated for her ovaries, but because she is a terrible person, unworthy of being president. At this point of market saturation, anything save her face on a paper sells. Nobody wants to barf up their breakfast in disgust seeing the face of evil comming to get them, while eating breakfast on the newspaper. It is very distressing, and the American people don’t tolerate this… market forces rule this matter.