That’s exactly what it means.
In that it’s not an other go’round, but the same go’round—time is a circle. Think about it.
As for its being an alternative to death: what do you mean by that? It certainly won’t be an alternative to dying; and as for the state of “being dead”, one will have no awareness of that, anyway, so in that regard it doesn’t matter whether one’s birth follows on it or not.
For his auntie Agnus and uncle Steve it is an alternative to death…doesn matter if their aware of being dead, their aware of death while living and fear it… Dat’s not central here because im jus saying that people like that choose ou of fear…
Any way,lets talk about the will to power?! Nietzsche finds the will to power as the path to overcoming, or am i wrong here. Where does Nietzsche link these concepts and do they play off each other?
In that case, they only want the eternal recurrence because they misunderstand it.
I’m not really interested in that at this point. Let’s talk about the eternal recurrence some more. I contend the following:
Insofar as what is had is an other go’round, it’s another person having it.
I was reading Chapter 25 of a History of Western Philosophy on Nietzsche the other day and thought it relevant to this conversation. Russell doesn’t really float my boat but he certainly has an interesting perspective.
This is the audio of the chapter:
youtube.com/watch?v=S9WNK5oS714
youtube.com/watch?v=_QLWNp3T … re=related
youtube.com/watch?v=cGs6C29u … re=related
i was never much into reading what others thought, while it happened that i enjoyed to think sentences others realized, this kind of introduction is only to point out my rejection to nietzshe s writings in form and substance
in truth individual free sense exist in being true one right, while guys like him insist to mean existing from another way
the mean is like to take advantage from one right negatively, by inventing a constancy of one against all, and the pleasure of that nonsense is the reason of its constant fact already in concept of
my mean is to see it in depth of what it is, i think what nietzshe as others are, is the rejection of else concept as the base of positive right being someone, even when else concept is truth or objective facts or subjective life
in truth, free sense is exclusively what is out of positive objective intelligence superiority, that lead the fact to a peak constancy becoming free exponential value
it happens that positive intelligence superiority is never anyone reason while it is all what is there abondant from void taken for granted to possess better own positive existence life out of it more
in truth rights, one conscious must admit being true before meaning its freedom right, so conscious right is what act in regards to objective positive rights and to others positive realizations rights in being free livings, then only conscious has all the rights to state itself freedom as it wish and reject existence and life too for itself in meaning inventing smthg different
i think nietzshe philosophy is based on the will to justify one truth in the mean to reject truth freedom value
that is how i see eternal retour, in the mean that absolute freedom dont and didnt realize anything right to consider it existing reference value but mostly in the mean that absolute truth is one and not objective life relations
and will of power, is also meaning individual conscious base sense of being true is the will to be one subject superiority over all objective concept, to kill mostly the truth of being one as exclusively in the relation with all as else in positive objective regards as only one while for one absolute freedom rights out of all