Nietzsche's _BGE_ argument for his "will to power" doctrine.

[unsuper]

@Sauwelios

Syllogism III

7. “Will” can affect only “will”—and not “matter” (not “nerves,” for example).
   8 = 6.
8. One has to risk the hypothesis whether will does not affect will wherever “effects” are recognized—and whether all mechanical occurrences are not, insofar as a force is active in them, will force, effects of will.

i dont get that. will, itself, is the power to effect matter

[Sauwelios]

@Jakob

Contrary to what you and Plato think, thought is rooted in experience of a specific type - the human type - and not vice versa. You are truly an anti-Nietzschean.

What you seem to think Plato thought, I think was only his exoteric doctrine. And I agree with his esoteric, not his exoteric doctrine, of course.

I suspect now that when you conceded that I had a point, this was not because you saw it, but because, following me, two other posters said they had had enough of your methods.

Complete bullshit. Not to mention the rest of your post, which speaks for itself…

One of those posters was Monooq, who doesn’t count, and the other was Remster, who only half-counts. As for yourself,—