No knowledge or investigation can be made on a thing that cannot be thought as “part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, and fulfillment.”
Why?
No knowledge or investigation can be made on a thing that cannot be thought as “part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, and fulfillment.”
Why?
(Note: I’m using caps for emphasis, not loudness, its one of my bad habits)
Well first we have to BREAK DOWN THE LANGUAGE, language is a description of an OBJECT or a SHAPE of a THOUGHT we have in our minds.
Part - is part of a VISUAL object
Whole - part of a visual object
equivalence - shape matching, congruence - informational / physical geometry (i.e. triangle, cow = animal, etc)
uniqueness - PART (uniqueness is a quality of an object, i.e. a pattern)
LIMIT - the boundary of an object (edge, etc)
LINK - (not sure here??) but I imagine this means a tree of objects that are connected or merged
Influence - OBJECTS that have organic qualities (i.e. viruses infect hosts, etc)
Sensation - i.e. pure data that is interpreted by our biological systems (rightly, or wrongly)
Origin - a point or object of what object(s) of which something is derived (real or imagined)
Derivative – an object which is the child of other objects either physical / informational (concepts are objects in the informational realm).
Rule - Consequences or laws of how objects interact
Condition - boundaries on interaction between objects, or relations between the traits of object(s) themselves.
Fulfillment – Organic objects that have goals, (i.e. meeting some arbitrarily defined target, for object interaction = fulfillment).
All these things ultimately come back to geometry or mathematics at some point. They are all based on visual data.