Actually, I formally abdicated my old thinking. I’m against taking nothing further than nothing or even into becoming something. Which, actually, was the initial problem I’ve since withdrawed from. If you’ve read enough of me you’ve seen I’ve tried to put ‘self’ in nothing, or other properties into nothing… I’m deciding not to do that anymore, i just don’t like those OLD views.
Nothing and Something are two different words describing, or attempting to, the absent absolute.
As there is no absolute nothing there is no absolute something and so, in reality, these words refer to the same concept but with a different nuanced twist.
The Something refers to the absolute as the attainment of an ideal and so the achievement of inertia through perfection.
The Nothing refers to the same imagined indefinable concept but as the failure of all ideals; the obliteration and total deconstruction of existence and so the achievement of inertia through perfect imperfection.
Both are references to hypothetical and imagined completions and end to existence and both refer to what is absent, since we cannot find any evidence of either.
We suppose them as underlying existence or being ultimate goals.
They are, in fact, the human mind projecting its imagination so as to construct an artificial concreteness that can be used to make the continuous flux comprehensible.