Over and over again:
Note a set of circumstances in which we exchange our current thinking about God and religion as this relates to our current thinking about morality here and now and immorality there and then
Then in this exchange you can note these accusations you level against me.
That’s the dialogue that I wish to pursue. God and religion as it relates to the behaviors we choose in regard to conflicting goods as that pertains to our thinking about “I” on the other side of the grave. That is the whole point of this thread.
Okay, so how do you view god and religion in regard to the behaviors you choose when confronted with a context in which others challenge those behaviors?
Instead, it’s ever and always up in the clouds with you:
Then explain the assumptions that you have accumulated in regard to free will, omniscience and the distinction you make between a God and a No God world.
Given a context that most of us are likely to be familiar with. Instead, we get this “context”:
Note to others:
What point is he making here that I am apparently unable or unwilling to grasp?