All wars are the result of conflicts of interest between nations. One nation and the problem of conflict is resolved. So there will be no war.
_
I disagree… the constant civil-wars in Africa and in the Middle East and Arab states, for instance?
Of course, a minimum level of education and tolerance is needed to gather people under one flag.
…and even then, I still do not think that Nations-conjoined will cease all war and in-fighting… unless there is no money land and resources to keep fighting over.
Balance that, with a decent quality of life and livelihood in a non-suppressive/repressive environment, then that would somewhat be getting on the right track.
Why people should fight for land if the land and resources within belong to everybody?
Of course, we need a non-suppressive/repressive government. People should feel comfortable with such a government.
That was exactly the point I made… though there’s a sharp difference between corporate-owned land and government-owned land, and the former being the sole profiteer from that land.
I don’t think that humanity/grown people wants/needs an authoritarian governing presence, dictating their lives to them.
I agree.
Oh my bad, I should have said we don’t need…
The latter being preferable, for socio-economic homogeny accountability and transparency.
Nice to see you back on ILP, bahman. ; )
I agree.
Nice to see you too. By the way, it is very quiet here. Are we alone? 
Hahaha! it seems so… long exchanges of debate are tiring, after-all.
Globalism is the solution?
Right.
What if we castrate all males.
That’ll be another solution.
Heraclitus said…‘war is the father of all.’
No need for long treatises …short and sweet.
Lakonizein Esti Philosophein.
Yes.
You are not serious, are you?
He was wrong!
So, we’re in fantasy land…the realm of the romantic idealist.
A hippie?
Homo Americanus I presume?
Carry on.
Children need their space.
If a state/nation has a poor civil/human rights record, they will not make a good global partner, either. If they have an excellent civil/human rights record, they will not partner with those who don’t.
Beware false peace.
Submit to the sword of radical peace.
Hopefully, this fantasy land become real.
It is the duty of more civilized nations to put effort into the education of less civilized ones. So the problem that you are mentioning is resolved over time.
What do you mean?
We have conflicts of interest in families, and the solution isn’t to no longer differentiate between the roles and needs of mother, father, children, uncles, aunts, cousins, nephews and nieces. If the smallest unit provides no simple solution, how can nations become one?
False peace doesn’t resolve, but pretends empowerment that eventually is concentrated away from the vulnerable and toward the exploiters—who eventually no longer need to pretend.
Radical peace confronts according to rules of engagement with the aim of empowerment for all stakeholders as far as is practically possible, using the rule of law to prevent exploitation of loopholes—rather than using it to embed them (bake them in).