One should agree with the modern professional scientific int

Philosophy Forums Philosophy
1

The Final Question: Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intellects even if it is a lie?Do you agree that one should agree with the modern professional scientific intellects even if it is a lie?

According to modern Professional Scientific Intellects:

  1. Science never searches for divisibility.
  2. Science never searches for comparability.
  3. Science never searches for connectivity.
  4. Science never searches for sensitivity.
  5. Science never searches for transformability.
  6. Science never searches for substitutability.
  7. Science never searches for satisfiability.
    One should agree with these statements. Else, you would be branded as maniac! Am I right?

Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about divisibility of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn?t mathematics teach you that everything is perfectly divisible by unity?

Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about comparability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Doesn?t science teach you the methods of comparing and contrasting things?

Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about connectivity of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Anything which cannot be connected to your mind cannot be thought.

Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about sensitivity of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? How can one assay the cause-effect if no thing has sensitivity?

Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about transformability of atoms, molecules, ions,numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? Hasn?t science taught transformations of energy, matter, equations, sentences?

Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about substitutability of atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities? No computer can be at work if does not have searched for substitutability. What is going to be in the place of what is present now? What is evolution?

Doesn’t science search, find and teach you about the conditions which could be satisfied (satisfiability) by atoms, molecules, ions, numbers, equations, words, cells, tissues, organs, and other entities?

What would your knowledge be if no thing has divisibility, comparability, connectivity, sensitivity, transformability, substitutability and satisfiability?

2

I completely disagree that one should agree with everything scientists come up with. Scientists are quite often biased, and one of the main reasons of that is that they’re state-funded, so a lot of the time scientists will skew results to favor the agenda of the people paying them.

As a matter of fact, the statement “One should agree with everything modern scientists come up with” is inherently unscientific.

The scientific method is a great tool. Sadly, I can’t say with any sense of sureity that all or even most scientists adhere to those principles.