Online Chess

[von_Rivers]

Anybody play online chess against other people? What’s the best site?

I used to play at chesscube.com… but I ran out of trial cubits, and it’s not free. Any suggestions?

[Stuart]

I used to play occasionally on MSN, I don’t recall any problems.

[iambiguous]

As you might imagine, I’m a checkers man myself.

Here, you can make the first move:

calculatorcat.com/games/tic_tac_toe.phtml

[Stuart]

I can or VR can? And then whomever it is your referring to, should we, or are you only making a general claim to the factuality of our ability in this regard? And then what about the second or third move? You’re going to have to much more specific Iam.

[iambiguous]

@Stuartp523

I can or VR can? And then whomever it is your referring to, should we, or are you only making a general claim to the factuality of our ability in this regard? And then what about the second or third move? You’re going to have to much more specific Iam.

Why don’t you and von play first. I can play the winner.

[von_Rivers]

@Stuartp523

I can or VR can? And then whomever it is your referring to, should we, or are you only making a general claim to the factuality of our ability in this regard? And then what about the second or third move? You’re going to have to much more specific Iam.

To wit, how on earth are we going to play if one thinks a Knight should move three squares and one thinks four. Down on the ground, it all depends on the meaning of words, rooted in dasein, supported by the internal logic of words defending and defining other words. Sans God, who is to say how many squares a Knight should move? Does the dictionary define the most rational manner in which a Knight should move? Add to this Tom and Mary’s abortion.

I have not encountered an argument for how a Knight should move that convinces me absolutely that it moves in the most rational manner.

Unless, of course, I’m wrong.

[iambiguous]

@von Rivers

@Stuartp523

I can or VR can? And then whomever it is your referring to, should we, or are you only making a general claim to the factuality of our ability in this regard? And then what about the second or third move? You’re going to have to much more specific Iam.

To wit, how on earth are we going to play if one thinks a Knight should move three squares and one thinks four. Down on the ground, it all depends on the meaning of words, rooted in dasein, supported by the internal logic of words defending and defining other words. Sans God, who is to say how many squares a Knight should move? Does the dictionary define the most rational manner in which a Knight should move? Add to this Tom and Mary’s abortion.

I have not encountered an argument for how a Knight should move that convinces me absolutely that it moves in the most rational manner.

Unless, of course, I’m wrong.

So, is that an X or an O?
Oh, by the way: Checkmate.

[Moreno]

chess.com perhaps. It used to be free. Haven’t been there in a while.

[statiktech]

@von Rivers

@Stuartp523

I can or VR can? And then whomever it is your referring to, should we, or are you only making a general claim to the factuality of our ability in this regard? And then what about the second or third move? You’re going to have to much more specific Iam.

To wit, how on earth are we going to play if one thinks a Knight should move three squares and one thinks four. Down on the ground, it all depends on the meaning of words, rooted in dasein, supported by the internal logic of words defending and defining other words. Sans God, who is to say how many squares a Knight should move? Does the dictionary define the most rational manner in which a Knight should move? Add to this Tom and Mary’s abortion.

I have not encountered an argument for how a Knight should move that convinces me absolutely that it moves in the most rational manner.

Unless, of course, I’m wrong.

Hahaha!