Only man is fit to be God.

When you start thinking the wrong way, it is hard to come back to the right way.

“A moment ago, you were telling that animals should be our role models to decide morals.”

At no time did I indicate this. You are either deliberately lying or just did not read it right.

Get the quote and we can see who screwed up.

Would you follow some non-human master or God?

As to Adam and dominion over the earth, God is an Indian Giver it seems as he then gave it to Satan.

Or are you saying that the temptation of Christ never happened because Satan did not have the dominion to tempt Jesus with?

Regards
DL

I understand God to have the capacity for absolute forgiveness, and that he will exercise this forgiveness if you pray to him before you die. I just typed ‘where in the bible does it say god will forgive all your sins’ in google and the top result that came up was 1 John 1:9: biblehub.com/1_john/1-9.htm (there are all the different versions there)
To me, that is saying that God will forgive you if you admit your sins.

So your last response was irrelevant.

Absolutely.
Would you follow some human master(s) as if he was a god?

You mean God did not have to demand the murder of his son. Nice.

Then why did he do such a sinful thing?

Who is more likely to demand a human sacrifice? Satan or God?

Regards
DL

That is all any of us have ever followed.

What has been said of God that was not said by a man?

What words has God ever spoken except in delusional minds?

Regards
DL

What people follow most is moronic ideas, such as:

You call it moronic but cannot refute anything.

Frustrating as hell. Right?

Regards
DL

You bear the onus. If we are to take your questions as implicit beliefs - iow assertions. Demonstrate you that, for example, only delusional minds have thought they heard God or whatever the implicit belief you have is in that ambiguous question.

I don’t pretend to understand the inner workings of god. Maybe child sacrifice was actually quite common back then? Maybe God didn’t demand it, that’s just what they said to justify the sacrifice?

I’m going with the third option: a man is more likely to demand a sacrifice than any mythological being.

Now, can you please actually return to the real argument. That is, could you please show me how a graded punishment system with no built-in forgiveness button is more moral than having the same punishment for all sin with the ability to forgive built in.

That’s zero tolerance with built-in capriciousness. :smiley:

Onus piece #1.

youtube.com/watch?v=LNSe4Ff … r_embedded

Regards
DL

I cannot in the way you have put the question but let me try to show why.

Our human system is graduated and does have a built in forgiveness button. It is called a victim report that courts ask for before sentencing. That tells the judge just how lenient or harsh he should be with his range of punishments.

As to your last, if that law would have a forgiveness clause, what would guide it. No victim report is ever asked for and the victims closure is ignored. That victimizes the victim again.

From a public safety POV, if a relatively minor criminal knows he will face the same sentence as a genocidal criminal, then he is more likely to kill any witnesses to his petty crime than not.

Society would then be shooting itself in the foot and hurting itself with such a draconian un-graduated penalty system.

Regards
DL

Well put and accurate I think.

Regards
DL

Man is found divine in the Word as his height approaches that of the Lord. Thus do the greatest exploits of man bring the full glory of life.

Indeed. As do the exploits that bring our inhumanity to man via God’s will.

Nothing is divine that has not been named so by man.

Regards
DL

And there is no other sentient species in the universe?

Not that we know of but the numbers are in their favor.

Regards
DL

And with those numbers there is a great probability that they would seek out habited worlds and affect outcomes.

It is more likely that they, like us, are inhibited by the speed of light and would likly never leave their local space. Just as we will not for many years.

Regards
DL

That would be true if they followed the same evolution speed, are about the same age. Our astronomers have not mapped or fully examined all planets or star systems. No way they can. Educated guesses is what they have. Even they admit that. Life as we know it may be rare but, even scientists admit there is a good probability intelligent life could form in different atmospheres.
A more evolved species that could be energy rather than physical could exist.
We know that our primitive energy in our brains can be measured/ seen/ heard with machines. Radio, TV, Sonar, radar, light etc. Can remain focused cohesive and carry information.
Our knowledge is young, science has just begun.
An ancient species will or could have so much more than us. Energy does not need a ship as we know it.
Just think about the real possibilities.