So, I have been thinking much of this idea in recent months, after finally coming to an understanding of general relativity, and the implications of the uncertainty principle as a form of possibility rather than just probability? Is it possible that dark matter is nothing more than the matter next door? and the seemingly “weak” force of gravity is spread out through the progression of parallel neighboring universes?
Also, how might anti-matter be explained in this manner?
in theory, yes, there can be what you said “matter next door”.
The problem cones when you try to prove it. Dark matter itself cannot be seen by any microscope of any sort but it can be seen if you put matter near it. it’s sort of like energy only matter. So what is dark matter comprised of? Dark matter being “matter” must be some sort of physical (includes energy and mass due to E=mc^2) and until we know what ti’s comprised of, we cannot be certain. because if dark matter is the matter next door, what allows dark matter to travel from one parallel universe to the other?
I personally think you can go somewhere with this if you have more facts about dark matter. The idea is interesting. I’ll have to sleep on this one.
I really should develop my thoughts more on this, but I was wondering if anyone knew of any current theories that followed this line.
Anti-matter seems to be a perfect way to show this parallel matter. Every visible particle in our own universe may have a contingent anti-particle separating whether we can see them or not. So the idea suggests that we do not have universes sitting side by side, but actually integrated into our own universe. Parallel particles side by side, maybe even fluctuating back and forth into our own reality.
Dark Matter is simply Proto-Atoms. It is ‘dark’ because all of it’s internal energy, or light, resonates internally between quarks. The end result is the compression and intertia of the Universe.
This Dark Matter is a result of the harmony of the Dark Energy that forms resonances that are bound by the pulses of said energy.
As far as parallel Universes goes…impossible. Congruent dimensions, yes…parallel Universes, absurd.
I’m not up to date on proto-atoms. Please explain. I’m not clear on your assuredness of what dark matter is? The last I have heard it is just a theory to explain the expansion of the universe and to possibly dissipate the weak force of gravity on equal terms with the other 3? Please correct me, if I am misunderstanding. Thanks.
As for congruent dimensions, please explain? Without your trademark “read this paper” hand off. Thanks.
Parallel universes is still alive and well among theorists. Maybe a less important matter at this point, but definitely not written off. If you are just disagreeing with the semantics, as in the plurality of universe when “uni”-verse clearly means all encompassing. Too bad. That’s the name that has stuck. Would you like to change the word for “atom” as well?
Well…I think I’ve posted 3 or 4 papers total on this site so for it to be a ‘trademark’ already…
Anyhoo…Dark Matter is essentially the ‘percolation’ of reality. It’s the making of atoms, thus the name proto-atoms. It’s ‘dark’ because it is, at this point, internally reflected. Until compression happens, we can’t see them. Once compressed we get atoms and ‘matter’ we can relate to.
It’s the birth of our matter.
Congruent dimensions is the ‘mixing’ of cycles that is happening all around us. Your body is dissipating at a slightly different rate than mine, and so on all the way from a rock to a plant.
‘Light’ is around us yet weighs nothing, to us. It’s in it’s own cycle, right there in front of us but so far away, speed-wise.
We are all in our own cycles at the same time, ‘travelling’ from the non-spatial all the way to the complex end of the spatial, where we are now. We will go back to the non-spatial (the electromagnetic waves we call rotting) once again. These waves will coalesce, compress, propagate, dissipate. Same cycle but different results. Like the old saying “You can’t step in the same river twice”.
Everything is a speed, nothing in the spatial is without speed. Our matter is simply the harmonious ‘fusion’ that happens at this speed.
It’s almost like a yo-yo being flung from the non-spatial, reaching this point and recoiling back.
What ‘flings’ the spatial? How can the non-spatial impart anything on the spatial. It’s seminal energy. Long story and I’d have to post a long equation-filled paper (this one is my paper) that no one would read through…and you’d yell at me for telling people to refer to it…
Another goofy thought is the Universe, or everything that cannot be contained, having an edge. That’s a paradox. No container.
The ‘edge’ of the Universe would be the unreachable, which is the non-spatial. It’s not there because the non-spatial moves relative to the spatial.
This is why we have the once thought paradoxes of the double slit and Spooky-action-at-a-distance. A complete misunderstanding of reality.
They are all solved by the same thing, which also happens to explain the confusing ‘edge’ of the Universe, dark matter, time, life, death…on and on. It’s really extremely simple…in concept, that is.
My apologies. That might have come out wrong. I was only commenting on the few threads I have followed of yours. I forget that you have 300+ posts. I do, however, feel your confidence a bit misguided. Science is a game of hypothesis and theory and then still more questioning. You come out of your statements with a knowledge of some kind of truth. It’s a bit ill-received by anyone of a scientific mindset.
On the other hand, I always quite enjoy a different perspective. It’s just hard to understand what you are talking about when you don’t use common terminology. If you can’t fit your theories into common terminology and you need to use custom terminology, please explain these terms as you go. Otherwise, I am just reading nonsense.
If I understand what you are suggesting, this is pretty much the same of line of thought I come from. Exactly what I’m trying to say with ‘parallel universes’. Gravity compresses these parallel “membranes” (if you will) creating the matter that we see in our visible “universe”.
Well, bring it on! Is it readable? Just make sure you define your terms. I’d actually love to read your conclusive theory now that you’ve hooked me with this compression idea.
