Are you perfect or scum?
- Perfect
- Scum
0
voters
Perfect or scum, what are you?
(Welcome to my world)
What a question LOL. I am the perfect me. I can’t be anything else but the perfect me. 
sorry but a question like that dosn’t really deserve an answer, I am onlyhuman same as you, if you ask if I see myself as great or evil, my answer is still human, meaning both and neither at the same instant.
sorry but that’s the way I see it.
LOL If it does not deserve an answer, why answer?
to make the unknown known, and the unaccepted accepted, since my viewpoint is also an oppinion than it should be placed along other oppinions otherwise it will simply be ignored.
people tend to do that, perhaps it’s part of being human, who knows.
Both: I’m a rare example of perfect scum.
/“scumwhere” far from perfect 
In my own world I am perfect just as I was intended to be but in the human world what we call the societal inclinations I am the scum of the earth or a delightful cancer that people seemingly want to destroy.
Yup… Someone already said it… I’m PERFECT SCUM!
Sometimes I’m perfect, other times I’m scum.
I’m more likely scum to many than perfect to any.
Scum is perfect.
And Pluralism is something that all philosophers in this age should know about.
I’m scum just like everybody else.
All this stuff about war and global warming, makes me feel like the answer is not Pull out of Iraq, or drive a hybrid car. It’s quit having babies everyone! People are the problem with the Earth.
Or Maybe Earth is the problem with people!
Or people is the problem with people!
Or Earth is the problem with Earth!
Can we truly see “everything” as alter and still be part of “everything”?
“Perfect” is boring, “perfect” is dead, but are boringness and death “perfect”?
What I know is that I am in time - I am being. But I am being multiple things at the same time and changing over time - Everyone is an actor of itself. But why is it that I, in forcing myself as uno, can see my “self” as multiple, while am only capable of doing so in acting uno? And don’t we slowly become the roles we play?
I really only am when I cannot be no more.
That’s like saying the traffic jam, it’s all these damn cars!
I’m sure you think your driving experience would be nicer if everyone else wasn’t there, but they’re saying the same thing about you.
Unless you’re saying that YOU being born is the problem?
Might be a mis-diagnosis, but at least it wouldn’t be hypocritical.
See, the problem wouldn’t be hybrid cars and ceasing wars if you weren’t born yet… but now, seeing that you already are, that discussion is finished: it doesn’t mean you have to reject caring for your world and environment.
Needless cruel war and environmental damage aren’t dead issues, nor are they beside the question. Sure, they would be if you could travel back in time and make yourself unborn. But don’t you think it would be easier and more expedient to care about the more practical stuff in the meantime?
Anyway, I think hybrid cars and iraq are more relevant problems. Way I see it, the problem ISN’T all the people. It’s what the people DO.
Let me just say that I actually despise the idea of judging people as either perfect or scum.
“scum. always and never never. eternity arose as a by-product of the neverending string of death threats that arose when I a rose.”
Good, because although I’m perfect, and other people are scum, I despite judging people like that too.
there is neither PERFECT nor SCUM.
there is only what you want to be, as defined by others.
meaning created from interpretation thrusted into what carelessly termed “REALITY”.
no one is really responsible for it while everybody seems to WANT to affected by it.
I see what you are saying, AlternateParallelReality, and I have considered this hypocrisy.
My conclusion, as I said, is that I am scum like everyone else. Yes, the problem is that I was born. Or at least part of the problem.
I think the only way the world would be without suffering is without people there to suffer.
Sure, its too late for me to not be born, so that discussion is over. But we shouldn’t simply accept the way things are going now, throw in the towel and go for half-assed solutions. The way to stop the big problem is to find the big solution. Fewer people. A manageable number of people. Or, no people.
I agree that the problem lies in what people DO. But I do not think people will stop doing what they are doing. So if we can not change what people do, I think the next step is, logically, reduce numbers of people.
I want to make it clear that I am not advocating genocide in any way. War is a major part of the problem, and I don’t believe in fighting fire with fire. Simply impose a few international laws reducing reproduction. If our numbers stop growing so will the issues. Eventually, the human population will be small and in balance with the rest of the world, and then we will be as detrimental as caribou.
And perhaps something will happen and there will be no people at all and that would be fine with me, too. Any reason to believe that the human genome should be preserved is anthropocentric and completely subjective.
No ansewer.
I’m perfect as I am. I am perfect with my inperfections.
Perfect is subject to interpretation. So is scum.