Philosophical Gossip

It would have to be that whatever destroys the erf and brings about the end of dayz was part of the plan. Now watch this.

We don’t count natural disaster here because natural disasters aren’t moral and have no freewill. Only the collective bad shit that all the bad people do that accumulates and brings about the end is what counts.

Dilemma: if the end of days is the logical result of bad choices, but also predetermined and therefore necessary, then somebody had to make bad choices to bring about the end of dayz… which means somebody had to not have freewill.

They couldn’t have freewill and merely make bad choices because if by chance they had chosen not to, god would be wrong about the end of days bit. That’s logically impossible.

Check mate.

Problem: how does god hold guilty those who would end up making the bad choices that brought about the end of dayz he had planned from the beginning?

You can also aks did god know in advance the fall of Sodom and Gomorrah? Of course he did. Same terms applied there, then.

Yes. This is, indeed, scary shit. You know I’m right, and now you’re like wtf. But this is only if you try to make sense out of Christianity. If you stay away from it, you won’t suffer this stuff and go crazy. It’s because you’re tryna force something to work that just won’t fuckin work. The freewill, the euthyphro dilemma, the problem of evil, all this nonsense generates from the logical contradictions built into the ideas themselves.

There is no problem of evil because there is no evil. Same with what is good. There is no problem of ‘is it good because G says it is or does he say it is because it’s good and he recognizes that’ because there is no good.