Every time some idiot screws up they invent a new law in order to baby proof the world.
Just now on the news, they wanted to outlaw feeding ducks on public property because of the litter it causes when people throw things the ducks don’t eat. Isn’t that the stupidest law you’ve ever herd?
Now in St Paul there is these caves that people start fires in and kill themselves from the carbon monoxide build up. Public officials said it would cost millions to seal the entrance. So they put signs warning people to keep out. I thought up two solutions,… educate people on the dangers with signs. Thus allowing natural selection to progress to the level of eliminating people who cannot read. Or drill some holes to allow ventalation. The only reason they don’t take it that seriously is because they know these caves are mainly used for kids who want to drink and party. Thus the priorety level becomes eliminating the deaths and the drinking.
When laws are created on a federal level, you can usally obvert them by obtaining a licence to do so when nessecary. This licence shows you are educated on the pros and cons of such a thing that needs a licence to do. This is what I believe is the answer to averting a police state.
What I think will cause a police state is people trying to be your big brother and tell you what to do. This is reinforced with cameras in obseen places and what ever else it takes to insure the law is followed. Yet if people don’t want to freely follow the law,… their is a rebellion if only in their minds.
Liberalists that try to sanatize the enviorment through limiting what people focus on, will only cause people to hold onto their values in a rebelious way. They try to do this with the seperation of church and state. They try to do this with political correctness on TV. They try to do this with corperate code of conduct. All through the cival liberty guise. Yet, they refuse to let people of opposing views to have equal say even though their own stance has never been proven. They want kids growing up to assume that their is no logical stance against their supperior intellect.
Why is this mentallity allowed in the USA, because they have already been brainwashed by limiting perspective. Some aspects of their limited perspective have been over extended to obvert what they want to avoid. People haveing an opinion based on religious mentallity and facts. Allowing people to create their own philosophy. Since science cannot allow ideas of the soul to enter their mind untill their is scientific reason to look that way. All of our progression will be from a moral void.
What is the hopes of the religious scientist who is socially forced to hide their religion? They hope logic will soon break through this blindness. They hope people will wake up from this liberalistic dream that screams corperate communism of ideas, where corperations and then government will decide what us comrads are allowed to think in public. The thing about this is, corperations are people pleasers, and will bend over backwards for the buck, and not realistic ideals of morals that cannot be proven.