Interesting ongoing conversations with Wyld let me to the premise, diametrically opposed to an important aspect of his convictions, that politics needs to die off, and that Trump vs Hillary signifies this moment. Neither suffices as “politician” in the sense that we’re used to - either one of them is overtly (or jut obviously) self-interested and lying - people who vote for Hillary are basically psycho’s or non-entities, people who vote for Trump are just bastards. I’d qualify in the last category. You can’t be a decent person, or claim to be, and vote for either of these people. Yet I’d vote for Trump as I dont believe decency was ever part of the equation, except as a PR asset and a marketing tool, or a tool to reorganize industry.
This reoarganizing industry is the only thing of importance that I see now. Races have always been -ist, I dont see them stopping until the sun swallows the earth, but what we can prevent is the Earth becoming an entirely dead zone with robots (humans 2.0) feeding off synthetic foods. We can rip up globalism and uproot all ideological plans and just focus only on arranging things so that we get a world full of producing economies. I believe the matters over which politics rules today will largely be resolved by sane economic programming.
People can take care of themselves if they have enough to eat and a sensible thing to do with their lives. If not, they’ll first resort to some ideology, then they’ll eventually end up being political. But what they politicize against is always an economic state of affairs - a situation that places limits on the human exchange of individual values.
Hillary Clinton represents the abandoning of individuality and the embracing of a collective group soul, from which roughly half of the worlds people (me included) are axiomatically excluded. In the sense that this is still politics, it is an end game.