Uh, define āsoonā?
Would you like me to define chickenshit?
Well, among other things, itās a Joker who doesnāt walk the talk.
In not going here, for example:
[b]Though, sure, the invitation is still open. Let us explore the manner in which he construes himself by focusing in on these things:
1] there is a āreal meā and there is a set of moral and political values that encompass objectively āthe right thing to doā. You thought it was one thing, then another, then another.
2] there is no āreal meā and there is no set of moral and political values that encompass objectively āthe right thing to doā. Instead āIā here is embodied subjectively/existentially in dasein, in moral and political prejudicesā¦in the arguments I make for it/this in my signature threads; and specifically in this thread: ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ā¦ 1&t=176529 . [/b]
And this part:
Also, once you change your moral and political frame of mind, you are acknowledging that you were once wrong about the is/ought world around you. And, once you acknowledge this, you are acknowledging that, sure, you might be wrong again. You are acknowledging that, yeah, given new experiences, new relationships and access to new information, knowledge and ideas, you might be prompted to change your mind again. And again.
And this part:
[b]So, what I suggest is that we focus in on a particular set of circumstances in which we can examine our respective moral and political philosophies. Given all of the points we raise above.
And, most important of all, Iām less interested in what you or I believed/believe regarding all of the things you and I were/are, and more interested in how exactly you and I would go about demonstrating to others that all rational men and women are obligated to think and feel the same.[/b]
And especially this part:
[b]You say that āhere and nowā you are a āpolytheistic pagan Gnostic with an affinity for mysticism, the esoteric, and the general occult. I lean kinda towards pantheism.ā
Okay, letās zero in on a particular context, a particular set of āconflicting goodsā in which as this you now choose one set of behaviors that you would not have chosen as one of the many things you once were previously.
As this relates to my own interest in philosophy: morality here and now, immortality there and then.
And as it relates to your interests.[/b]