These men are great military leaders, great inventors, great businessmen, great spiritual leaders, who have accomplished impossible things. I want to be associated with them. And they want to be associated with me. It’s like a club, with restricted membership. Only great people should be allowed in this club.
We share a race with these men, a common genetic heritage.
Neo-liberals hate racism. But, in hating racism, they overlook the most obvious factor of all. I want to be included into my race. I want people to look at me, and when they do, they are reminded of all the positive stereotypes of my race. And my race has achieved much. In this way, when I achieve something great, then the rest of my race benefits from my positive conduct and achievement.
When I do something great, this represents a success of my family, my friends, my community, my society, my race.
How dare you, you degenerate liberals, who want to take the positive gains away from my race??? I want my success to be associated with my race. When you look at my skin color, I want the first impression of your brain, to be overwhelmingly positive. I want all the positive stereotypes to appear first. The best, the good, the powerful, the strong, the smart, the beautiful, the kind, the wonderful, the nobility.
The anti-racist movement needs to end. I promote here, pro-racism. Because I want to pass all my good deeds, my achievements, my successes, onto my race. And everybody who shares in my race, will benefit through me. And I allow this, I choose it. It is my choice, my freedom.
If you are successful, then pass this success onto your race. Be a positive role model, a leader, of your race.
What’s really ironic is that you weren’t even speaking of racism. Naïve American “liberals” might claim what you said is racism if you were white, but if you were any race other than white, they would be very proud of you.
You want to get credit for all the positives. Are you prepared to take responsibility for all the negative stereotypes?
Your failures also represent your family, friends, community, society and race.
BTW, don’t you live in a community and society which has a mix of races? I do.
The biggest problem with racism is that a racist claims positive attributes for his own race and assigns negative attributes to other races.
Wanting credit for something people did before you is lame. You should do something yourself, now that is worthy of getting credit. Don’t try and freeload off your ancestors and don’t try and mooch status that you didn’t earn and don’t deserve. This whole thing just made my stomach turn.
Of course, if you devote your positive achievements to the rest of your race, then you must also be responsible for your own flaws and negative impacts on others. I have impacted a few people negatively, not many, but a few. And I would like to go back and prevent those mistakes, but the past is the past. I can’t change that. For now, I’m devoted to leaving no more negative impressions, and leaving the most positive impressions.
Because every individual is responsible for her greater race. Your actions reflect your race, but not other races.
Mixed race people represent other mixed race people. Mixed race people can also pick and choose, to devote positive traits to one race and negative traits to another, or all to one or the other. That is the benefit of a mixed race person. They can choose the positives and negatives. But it needs to be rational and justified. There needs to be reasons for it.
If you’re just one race only, like me, then I have no choice, but to positively reflect my race, and try to do no wrong. Because I represent the rest of my race.
That doesn’t matter, as long as the positive and negative associations are true. For example, one race maybe more thieves. Or another race maybe more honest, as a whole, on average. These traits can be measured, if the liberals would move out of the way, push them aside, and allow us to measure these facts scientifically, popularly, and without political correctness biased censorship. The liberals need to lay down.
My ancestors worked very hard to make my life possible, and bless me with all that I have. Part of this is staying true to race, staying true to your common heritage, your family, your community. If my ancestors specifically write down, that they devote their accomplishments to me, my relatives, and my race, then I should accept their offering. They wanted me to benefit from their sacrifices.
I don’t see anything “lame” about this. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to leave a positive lifetime for your descendants. Given enough time, many contributions directly relate to some races, but not others.
I do deserve it, though. My ancestors specifically mentioned that they wanted this. They wanted what’s best for me. This applies to my race. My ancestors wanted what is best, not just for me, but my relatives, my extended families, and my race as a whole.
The same argument could be given for inheriting money.
In the end, only one race would have money and thus dominate the entire world even though they were not the most intelligent nor praise worthy as leaders.
When you take actual skill out of the equation, nepotism or favoritism (for any reason), you beg for world wide suffering and possible extinction of homosapian.
What you are living through right now is what you have suggested.
One race is dictating that no other race distinction is to be allowed, “Eloi and Morlocks”.
But you go right ahead.
You misunderstood. I’m not talking about a mixed race individual, I’m talking about a society made up of individuals of many races. My neighbors are oriental and black and white. I cannot talk about the achievements of the ‘community’ and break it up into races. I share the positive and negative stereotypes of most of the world’s races as long as I identify with my country or city or school. So then race only makes sense if I segregate myself from community.
Let’s say that you could use police statistics to determine that 3 out 10 people of Race T are thieves at some point in their lives. And 2 out of 10 people of Race N are thieves…
Looking at an individual of Race T, what could you say about him? Based on statistics, you would have to say that he is not a thief. You would say the same about an individual of Race N.
Even if individual T000234 is actually a thief, you do not know if he will steal from you, or if he will ever steal again.
You also don’t know why he stole. It’s possible that because of racist policies, he could not get a job and was forced to steal in order to feed himself and his family.
Let’s look at IQ tests. Suppose you know that statistically Race D scores 10 points lower than Race N… you still do not know if an individual of Race D is brilliant or dumb as a doornail - you don’t know his particular score. You can only gauge his intelligence by interacting with him. The test involves a lot of visual pattern matching. You may find that even if he scored low on the IQ test , he may have great ability to deal with people, or musical ability, etc.
This is false, because even if you inherit money, you could still want to work hard and make more money, as well as leave inheritance behind for your own children. So inheritance, alone, means nothing. It’s not until it’s squandered, that it’s “bad”. This is a bad analogy. Because racial inheritance is not monetary and not comparable to money. Money is temporal. Genes are permanent.
Oh, I see now, you are speaking about a multicultural liberal society.
What makes you believe that races can integrate with each other, just because they share a living space? Just because a family owns a dog and a cat, doesn’t make the whole family human. It doesn’t make the dog and cats human. I’m not saying this in a sense that humans are “better than” dogs and cats, but in simple terms of specie category. Races are not other races. They’re not the same types of organisms. They share a category, human, but they are not the same.
You could make the same argument that a family with cats and dogs, are “all mammals”. And so what you’re introducing here is, “what if we are all mammals?” In that case, you’re making an absurd point. Who cares if a family, with dogs and cats, are “all mammals”? That’s not what I’m talking about.
You can count a dog and cat family as an “all mammal family”, if you want to, but I see this for what it is. You’re just being politically correct. You want to “include everybody” into the picture. But you need to change the wording, labels, and terms. You need to say that “we’re all mammals” or “we’re all animals”. So you’re changing the depth of the abstraction.
Let’s say the rate of theft between races is 2/10 and 8/10. You obviously won’t want to live around the race of thieves which has an 8/10 occurrence rate. Now liberals will brand you a “racist” for this obvious truth. But you’ll be a hypocrite there. You will act on that data and fact of life. When Race R, with 8/10 theft rate, comes over to your house, you’ll be suspicious. Maybe unwarranted, maybe he’s one of the rare non criminals, non thief. But you are betting against the odds.
“He stole because of racist policies.”
This is a circular argument and circular reasoning. If Race R has 8/10 theft rate of its members, then the onus is upon you to justify sharing a society with Race R. You want to say that “we should not judge Race R”. Well that’s just too bad, for you. It’s a positive thing to judge other people. It’s good to pass judgment on others. Because safety and security is important.
If you want to live next to Race R, then go ahead, that’s your prerogative. Just don’t be a hypocrite, and tell me to do the same, or that “race doesn’t prove anything”. It does, obviously.
Statistics, science, and facts, unfortunately, do tell almost everything about individuals. It is acceptable to pass judgment on people, based on negative, and positive stereotypes.
This thread is focused on the positive stereotypes. I want you, and others, to pass judgment on me, for my positive contributions to my race.
And I specifically declare, here and now, that my positive contributions and achievements are for my race and those who share in my racial heritage.
I’m specifically telling those of my race, that you must accept what I do, on your behalf, for better or worse. And I must do the same for you. That is race realism. We’re in this together. Your liberal views cannot stop this. Because I’m right, and this is truth.
Actually this is completely opposite from reality. It will be the members of my own race, some of whom I despise greatly, who will leech off of me. People will be freeloading off of me, and I’m thinking ahead. I will leave an inheritance behind for my race, and others who I deem worthy.
Moocher? Nope, maybe this applies more to your personal experiences? I would rather die than mooch off other people. I have too much pride. I’d rather starve to death, then beg for money on a streetcorner like a bum. Living without pride and dignity is a waste of existence.
Furthermore, let’s say, just for sake of argument, that my grandparents left me over a million dollars, through their will, and named me as their heir. And I’m going to partake in this large sum of money within the next couple years. Why should I give it up? Mooching? Are you seriously implying that you wouldn’t take this money? I would and I will. There’s nothing wrong with that. Now, let’s imagine further, that my grandparents specifically mentioned, in letter, that they wanted me to have this, and they worked hard, saving up for their whole lives. They slaved their whole lives, to give me this opportunity, and they want to exemplify positive behavior. I am inspired by this, and want to double their fortune, and pass on even more inheritance to my own children, someday.
And you have the audacity to mock this or call it bad or negative? Are you seriously arguing that it’s bad to receive inheritance, to work to double it, and leave even more for future generations?
That sounds completely, ridiculously irresponsible. That’s just my impression. You are, of course, free to do whatever you want. But your counter argument is not convincing.
Also this underlying presumption that only individuals “earn” their lots in life, is false.
Societies also make greatness happen. And the greatness of a race is relational to the greatness of some individuals of that race. There’s nothing “wrong” with this. This is positive racism.
A race can “earn” its contributions whether individuals of that race want to, or not. It’s not really a choice, actually.
Would that mean that everytime something great happens, that an individual is not longer “human”, and disassociates from his specie, during a great action, innovation, or contribution to society? No, this is childish, ridiculous reasoning. You are implying that individuals can, or should, “disconnect from race”, whenever they do something great. That’s not realistic.
Sometimes you must embrace the race you were born into, whether you want to or not.
If they left it then fine it’s yours, but if they didn’t and you just want shit because of your race then you’re nuts, and racist, and you’re coming off as someone who’d rather have something free than earn it.
All I can tell you, smears, is that you’re wrong and have no idea what you’re talking about.
This accusation of “mooching” is just a petty, personal attack. You are arguing from emotion, not reason, at this point.
It is my race that will mooch off me, not the other way around. And I partially want them to, mooch off me. That is the whole point of saving wealth, and attributing it to some, but not others. If a person is wealthy, then she can pass it onto whomever she pleases. Smears, you have no authority and no say to dictate to others, how and to whom to leave inheritance.
It’s none of your business. You and I probably don’t even share the same race, which is neither here nor there, but it is what it is.
