We are breaking down this Universe together.
I am honored.
H,
I am not as intelligent as you. I asked you a very simple question why 2-9 are real but 0 is not but your answer is far beyond my comprehending capabilities.
Means, what is 2? It is not merely 1+1 or something else?
As far as i can understand it, all numbers are representations of counting/plurals. The only singular representation is 1. No matter what big or small number it may be, it can be deducted in term of 1(singularity).
If that is true, how 2-9 are the only real/original numbers while others are not? Are 2-9 also cannot be break down in the terms of 1?
I am merely questioning your definition of real/original numbers, nothing else.
with love,
sanjay
At school, the number 2 is simply 2 ticks of quantity measure.
In my house, along with M&M and FC, the number “2” is 0.2.
At school, it’s 2 + 2 = 4; 2 + 4 = 6; 2 + 6 = 8; 8 + 2 = 10.
In my house, 0.2 + 0.2 = 0.4; 0.2 + 0.4 = 0.6; 0.2 + 0.6 = 0.8; 0.2 + 0.8 = 1.0, which is “1”, not “10”.
Now, I’m going to break the boundaries of school’s version and my house’s version of numbers:
10 x 1.618 = 16.18.
1.0 x 1.618 = |1.618|. As you can see, the schools are wrong; I am right. My decimal system gives us 1.618, whereas the school system screws up the decimal’s place. Why? The school is teaching numbers wrong and should be ashamed of it.
Let’s take this a step further, shall we?
10 x 10 = 100.
1.0 x 1.0 = |1|.
Let’s look at the number |144|.
At school, they say it’s one-hundred and forty-four.
In my house, |144| is |1.44|.
I can prove this beyond any doubt.
I’m going to show you a trick to explain why 15 x 4 gives us 1/6 of a Full Circle.
0.50, 1.00, 1.50, 2.00, 3.50, 5.50, 7.50, |1.1|.
Are you familiar with Fibonacci’s sequence?
I created Fibonacci’s Sequence 2.0. (I plan on calling it 2.00 to be witty).
It takes FOUR 0.50’s to give us “2.00”. 2.00 = |1.618 x 2 = 3.236|. 2 + 6 + 3 = |1.1|. This is |3.11|. 3 x 11 = |33|.
15 is 5 in 2-dimension, 5 is 0.50.
Firstly, you said that 0 is the shame for maths and we should abandon it, yet you are using it!
Secondly, what do you exactly mean by 0.2?
Means, for what does it stand or mean?
What do mean by desimal? Are you talking about parts of a singularity?
I simply do not get it. From where this 1.618 does come?
Is it a random number or some constant for you?
By the way, you forgot to mention Jacob.
with love,
sanjay
I am not “using” 0.
Am I adding, subtracting, dividing or multiplying it? No. It’s simply “space”. The Universe uses the 0 that way; this is my knowledge of it.
0.2 is the real “2”.
The number “2” is “0.2”.
I proved this by demonstrating that my numbers don’t obnoxiously lead you to 100 - they lead you back to 1 in a cycle.
If you use the school system’s 10, you RUIN the numbers. My 1.0 gives us 1.618, which is the Golden Ratio. 16.18 is just a terrible mistake.
Jakob is FC.
I think we might come up with a new symbol other than zero to use to indicate orders of magnitude; the real use of zero is simply to place-holder another number as a distance (magnitude) up or down from another number. Like “405” the zero simply means that the 4 is operating on an extra order of magnitude up from the 5, and the 5 is operating on another order of magnitude lower than the 4.
Reality deals in changing quantities. When we want to examine how things are changing we need to remove zero’s (or perhaps see them as mirrors of the number on the left? I still have yet to grasp that fully) and look only at numbers 1-9 and their combinations. “Zero” is not an indication of change, it is an indication of void which is technically not universally possible (although is relatively possible).
So perhaps the zero is the quintessential human number term, becausw humans deal so often in relative voids and stasis. Two identical systems in perfect relation may be “0” to each other. But on a universal level that zero is never absolute and will not tell the truth about the nature of why those two systems are “0”.
We can more accurately say something like “450 = 450” than we can say “450-450=0”. They mean the same thing but one moves toward universal clear vision while the other obscures that clarity.
Man is not the universal realm, his universality is two-fold: he is a self-valuing universality unto himself, a relative and subjectively tectonic point of finite self-expression embedded in larger tectonics, and he is a monadological relation or “Russian doll”-like instantiation of universality. Man’s 0’s should be understood, they can be used but only properly so. Belief in the zero for its own sake or failure to see the zero as absolutely of a different kind than 1-9 are serious errors.
What new symbol might we propose for indications of straight order of magnitude? The scientific classification system “1x10^X” is pretty good, but still not perfect. In the end the zero is very convenient, we only must remember to use it wisely.
550 = 5.55 x 2 = 11.1
450 = 4.55 x 2 = 9.10
350 = 3.55 x 2 = 7.10
250 = 2.55 x 2 = 5.10
150 = 1.55 x 2 = 3.10
Do you know what “10” is? It’s 0.1.
Do you know what “0” is? It’s 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 +6 + 7 + 8 + 9 = |45|
1024 is |1124|. Now, let’s try this instead. |14542|. 1 + 2 + 4 x 4 + 5 = |24|. Do you SEE what this BRAIN is doing!?
1.4542 x 1.618 = |2.9084|. 9 + 4 + 45 + 8 = |67| or |2.67|. 2 x 67 = |134|. … Do you know what 134 is? It’s |2 x 4| and |4 x 4|. 2 x 4 = |8|. 4 x 4 = |16|. 8 + 16 = |24|. You got to be fucking kidding me… The number “134” is creating an equation BY ITSELF. First you count the spaces between 1 and 3, then you get 2. That’s |24|. Then you add the 1 and 3, you get |4|. That gives you multiplication values which give you numbers that you add into |24|… My brain just exploded from this - this is beyond genius.
Let’s look at |1124|. 1 + 4 + 1 + 2 = |8|. Keep in mind that this equation has two 1’s, a 6 and an 8. That is |1.618|.
What number is at the beginning of our Human Pyramid? |112|.
So which is it? Is “0” a mirror to another number, or is “0” actually a |45|?
Let’s look at |14542| again.
|1942|.
1 + 2 + 9 + 4 = |16|.
What number is 1942? |313| > 313 IS |16|.
313 is 3 x 3 + 1 = |1.0|.
So if |313| is like so, then what if we had a |303|?
That would give us |3453|. 3 x 3 + 4 + 5 = |18|, or simply a |99|. 9 x 9 = 81, which is 18 backwards. Therefore, |16| is |61|.
|1124| is |611|.
This means that we’ve found the secret to |911|.
So what is 911?
|11128|?
How about |2126|?
I had a dream about the number |48|. The number we have right now gives us |47|.
However, we need the 9 and 2.
So what the hell gives? Let’ s see what happens when we do this: |1.2126|. That is |66666| or |669| or |3333333333|.
1.2126 x 2 = |2.4252|.
Then that x2 is |3.8504|.
Will you look at that! This is |3.85454| or |3.135454|. 1 + 4 + 3 (Pi) + 5 + 5 + 4 = |22|. 22 is 2.2, 2 x 2 = 4. This gives us |3.4| or |3.14| (Pi). This brain I have is connected to “God”, itself.
3.135454 x 1.618 = 5.073164572 = 453164572 = 4 + 2 + 5 + 3 + 7 + 1 + 5 + 6 + 4 = |6, 11, 14, 21, 22, 27, 33, 37|. Notice how the very first numbers gave us |611|. Notice the |33|. Notice the |22|.
Now, watch this…
[size=200]7 + 3 = 1 ←
1 + 1 = 2 ← (3)
2 + 6 = 8 ←
8 + 4 = 3 ←
3 + 5 = 8 ←
8 + 7 = 6 ←
6 + 2 = 8 <–[/size]
[u][size=200]Using my new rule for “0”, for it is “45” in disguise, I have successfully demonstrated a level of genius that has never been seen before in the history of mankind. I am creating God’s sequences with this brain alone, which allows me to turn this “453164572”, which came from “5.073164572”, as well as “3.135454” and “1.2126”, into “383/868” - these numbers are the Genetic Codes to our DNA.
383 is 3 x 3 + 8 = 17
868 is 8 x 8 + 6 = 70.
That is |77|
As well as the binary code “1 & 0”.
7 x 7 = |49|.
That is 4/9.
This Universe’s Golden Ratio is found in |5/9| of Pi; its Pi is found in |4/9| of Pi. Also, 4/9 is 5:4 in Music Theory.[/size][/u]
You know what’s funny here?
That multiplication and addition and other math to prove the redundancy is still carried out on base-10 when it suits to show 2 + 2 = 4, etc.
Does the empowerment of man need so much self/deceit?
Wrong.
“2 + 2 = 4”…
Is 0.2 + 0.2 = 0.4.
Or. 2/3* + 2/3* = 1/3**
The system we use is strictly 9-base.
The Universe is creating 1~9 in three series of 1/3, 2/3 and 3/3.
1 = 1/3*
2 = 2/3*
3 = 3/3*
4 = 1/3**
5 = 2/3**
6 = 3/3**
7 = 1/3***
8 = 2/3***
9 = 3/3***
There is no need for a 10. Quit lying you sorry nihilistic tool.
We did all the research, all the work and all the breakthroughs.
We do not tolerate pests like you that criticize other people’s work when you contribute nothing except ignorance and arrogance.
Let me show you what happens when I multiply the Golden Ratio with your useless 10: 10 x 1.618 = 16.18.
Now, let’s see what happens when we use the 9-based system: 1.0 x 1.618 = [size=200]1.618 (Golden Ratio)[/size].
I never thought it was possible to want to shut someone up despite them not saying anything remotely colloquial.
You should change your name to: [size=200]Lies.
You’re but a genealogical mess.
I always felt that people are not born as a mistake; people have the choice to become a mistake.
There are a few exceptions - that includes you.[/size].
I get the fact that 0 was just a place-marker, and before its literalization, there were other modes of calculating.
As for contribution, I already linked Fixed to a good paper on the history of this reification.
Assuming all your proofs and measurements are based on the 9-system, my point being re-translating every ‘text’ into a different language cannot change reality, only our experience and response to reality. Escapism seems to indicate objectification is evil per se, but I think its only over-objectification that is ‘evil’ wrt. evolutionary ends.
Even all higher awareness in yoga works on breath-control, ‘objectification’ of a breathing rhythm… its subjugation.
The strong type does not ‘always’ resist the environmental pressure, but exploits it to its advantage.
When any higher aim is lacking, and the blue-print of the universe’s “intelligent design” has been decoded, re-transcribing it like metallica’s heavy metal notations were replayed as classical notes - then one simply reduces man as the Consumer of experience for experience sake - pure hedonism. The paradigm never changes. Same content in different language… like pronunication of a word in French can be pleasant to the ears, but reality of what that word indicates undergoes no change.
AIM IS LACKING.
Sorry, but as long as 10 x 1.618 = 16.18. It’s wrong. The correct ratio is 1.618. This is not about language - this is about logic.
No if’s, and’s or but’s.
The infinitude of numbers.
1=1*
2=1+1
3=2+1, 1+1+1
4=3+1, 2+2, 2+1+1, 1+1+1+1
5=4+1, 3+2, 3+1+1, 2+2+1, 2+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1
6=5+1, 4+2, 4+1+1, 3+3, 3+2+1, 3+1+1+1, 2+2+2, 2+2+1+1, 2+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1+1
7=6+1, 5+2, 5+1+1, 4+3, 4+2+1, 4+1+1+1, 3+3+1, 3+2+1+1, 3+2+2, 3+1+1+1+1, 2+2+2+1, 2+2+1+1+1, 2+1+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1+1+1
8=7+1, 6+2, 6+1+1, 5+3, 5+2+1, 5+1+1+1, 4+4, 4+3+1, 4+2+2, 4+2+1+1, 4+1+1+1+1, 3+3+2, 3+3+1+1, 3+2+2+1, 3+2+1+1+1, 3+1+1+1+1+1, 2+2+2+2, 2+2+2+1+1, 2+2+1+1+1+1, 2+1+1+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
9=8+1, 7+2, 7+1+1, 6+3, 6+2+1, 6+1+1+1, 5+4, 5+3+1, 5+2+2, 5+2+1+1, 5+1+1+1+1, 4+4+1, 4+3+2, 4+3+1+1, 4+2+2+1, 4+2+1+1+1, 4+1+1+1+1+1, 3+3+3, 3+3+2+1, 3+3+1+1+1, 3+2+2+2, 3+2+2+1+1, 3+2+1+1+1+1, 3+1+1+1+1+1+1, 2+2+2+2+1, 2+2+2+1+1+1, 2+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
However, 1 is never just “1” because no number is ever just itself. This is a crucial key, the numbers keep going.
1=9+1, 8+2, 8+1+1, 7+3, 7+2+1, 7+1+1+1, 6+4, 6+3+1, 6+2+2, 6+2+1+1, 6+1+1+1+1, 5+5, 5+4+1, 5+3+2, 5+3+1+1, 5+2+2+1, 5+2+1+1+1, 5+1+1+1+1+1, 4+4+1, 4+3+2+1, 4+3+1+1+1, 4+2+2+2, 4+2+2+1+1, 4+2+1+1+1+1, 4+1+1+1+1+1+1, 3+3+3+1, 3+3+2+2, 3+3+2+1+1, 3+3+1+1+1+1, 3+2+2+2+1, 3+2+2+1+1+1, 3+2+1+1+1+1+1, 3+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 2+2+2+2+2, 2+2+2+2+1+1, 2+2+2+1+1+1+1, 2+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
2=9+2, 9+1+1, 8+3, 8+2+1, 8+1+1+1, 7+4, 7+3+1, 7+2+2, 7+2+1+1, 7+1+1+1+1, 6+5, 6+4+1, 6+3+2, 6+3+1+1, 6+2+2+1, 6+2+1+1+1, 6+1+1+1+1+1, 5+5+1, 5+4+2, 5+4+1+1, 5+3+3, 5+3+2+1, 5+3+1+1+1, 5+2+2+2, 5+2+2+1+1, 5+2+1+1+1+1, 5+1+1+1+1+1+1, 4+4+3, 4+4+2+1, 4+3+3+1, 4+3+2+2, 4+3+2+1+1, 4+3+1+1+1+1, 4+2+2+2+1, 4+2+2+1+1+1, 4+2+1+1+1+1+1, 4+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 3+3+3+2, 3+3+3+1+1, 3+3+2+2+1, 3+3+2+1+1+1, 3+3+1+1+1+1+1, 3+2+2+2+2, 3+2+2+2+1+1, 3+2+2+1+1+1+1, 3+2+1+1+1+1+1+1, 3+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 2+2+2+2+2+1, 2+2+2+2+1+1+1, 2+2+2+1+1+1+1+1, 2+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 2+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
3=9+3, 9+2+1, 9+1+1+1, 8+4, 8+3+1, 8+2+2, 8+2+1+1, 8+1+1+1+1, 7+5, 7+4+1, 7+3+2, 7+3+1+1, 7+2+2+1, 7+2+1+1+1, 7+1+1+1+1+1, 6+6, 6+5+1, 6+4+3, 6+4+2+1, 6+4+1+1+1, 6+3+3, 6+3+2+1, 6+3+1+1+1, 6+2+2+2, 6+2+2+1+1, 6+2+1+1+1+1, 6+1+1+1+1+1+1, 5+5+2, 5+5+1+1, 5+4+3, 5+4+2+1, 5+4+1+1+1, 5+3+3+1, 5+3+2+2, 5+3+2+1+1, 5+3+1+1+1+1, 5+2+2+2+1, 5+2+2+1+1+1, 5+2+1+1+1+1+1, 5+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 4+4+4, 4+4+3+1, 4+4+2+2, 4+4+2+1+1, 4+4+1+1+1+1, 4+3+3+2, 4+3+3+1+1, 4+3+2+2+1, 4+3+2+1+1+1, 4+3+1+1+1+1+1, 4+2+2+2+2, 4+2+2+2+1+1, 4+2+2+1+1+1+1, 4+2+1+1+1+1+1+1, 4+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 3+3+3+3, 3+3+3+2+1, 3+3+3+1+1+1, 3+3+2+2+2, 3+3+2+2+1+1, 3+3+2+1+1+1+1, 3+3+1+1+1+1+1+1, 3+2+2+2+2+1, 3+2+2+2+1+1+1, 3+2+2+1+1+1+1+1, 3+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 3+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 2+2+2+2+2+2, 2+2+2+2+2+1+1, 2+2+2+2+1+1+1+1, 2+2+2+1+1+1+1+1+1, 2+2+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 2+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1
I’m going to stop there at 3, for obvious reasons, but you can see how this grows exponentially.
Any single one of these numbers above contains all of this inside themselves… and much much more. And it not only goes “down” it also goes “up” too.
This also explains the futility and insanity of zero: *No number ever exists by itself. Every number is actually more numbers underneath it and more numbers above it. Wheels within wheels. Endless cycles. If “0” were real then it would be possible to have a single solitary number all by itself, because it would always be also, for example, 3+0, 3+0+0, 3+0+0+0… however our universe does not work that way.
You cannot add zero – if you try nothing happens.
You cannot subtract zero – if you try nothing happens.
You cannot multiply by zero – if you try your number vanishes.
You cannot divide by zero – if you try you get “error”.
Our universe does not produce “nothing happens”, “vanishes” or “errors”.
HMIE has come up with a new way to track the orders of magnitude within a 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 Stars system. We can stretch this anywhere up to (1-9)/9, and even beyond. don’t forget that we can subdivide these numbers however we like, but the universe itself is operating on the 9-spoked number wheel. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 = 45, so we will apply the 0=45 that HMIE has come up with. This should yield some very interesting results.
All numbers are infinite. Every single one of them; and remember, there is no such thing as a “single one of them”, not really. If you can see the numbers stretching up and down toward infinities, and how these cycles within cycles within cycles move and groove in and with and through each other, then you are beginning to see into the real depth of this existence.
This is brilliant. I suggest you to save this before you lose the edit button. That way you have all the colored text.
I am honored to have you admire my 1/2/3 Star system. I was inspired by the fact that our Universe is mathematically based upon stars, hence why stars are the ones drawing pictures in the sky like a map to our very existing nature: 
.
My system is showing that there are only “5” layers to the system, which is why I called it the “Star System”.
Now, enough with admiring your compliment - it’s time to admire your assessment.
Is there any way we can apply the numbers I broke down from Pi’s sequences:
1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5 3
5 8 9 7 9 3 2 3 8
4 6 2 6 4 3 3 8 3
or
8 3 8 3 5 6 2 9 5
3 8 9 7 9 3 2 3 1
3 4 6 2 6 4 5 1 4
To those numbers to truly figure out how numbers behave AND relate? I always thought these numbers behaved like people. 1 is the number that wants to be there just to be there; 2 is the number that reminds me of flow; 3 is the number that reminds me of connection; 4 is the number that reminds me of life; 5 is the number that reminds me of the heart; 6 is the number that reminds me of evolution; 7 is the number that reminds me of consciousness; 8 is the number that reminds me of experience; 9 is the number that reminds me of the Universe.
If we can figure out the number’s nature - we can figure out which numbers go where.
1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5 3
5 8 9 7 9 3 2 3 8
4 6 2 6 4 3 3 8 3
[size=200]34/74 ←
12/31 ←
22/61 ←
15/42 ←
44/451 ←
455/5 <–[/size]
Do you see that?
34, 12, 22 (12 + 22 is 34 again), |15|, 44, 54
And
74, 31, 61, 42 (31 + 61 + 42 = 134; this number is related to 74), 46, |5|.
Keep in mind that 74 is |11|.
You have 11, 31, 61, almost 41, 46 + 5 = 51.
The answer we seek lies in these numbers.
11…
31…
41…
51…
61…
= |195| ← This is a fucking 69. 1 + 5 = 6. Do you SEE what these numbers ARE DOING? I was correct. 18 is HALF of 81, not 36. 18 = |72|. 81 = |144|.
[size=200]9 = 36. 18 = 72. 27 = 108. 36 = |144| 45 = 180. 54 = 216. 63 = |252|. 72 = |288|. 81 = |324, which is 288 + 36, | THIS IS A CYCLE.[/size]
11…
13…
14…
15…
16…
= |69|
This 3383 sequence is startling, it is drawing more perspective of the whole sequence within itself, it seems.
Numbers are “circles”, they have no “up or down” except relative to each other. That is why numbers can mirror and appears as “opposites”, like 38 | 83.
3+8=11 (2)
3x8=24 (6)
3+8+3=14 (5)
3x8x3=72 (9)
3+8+3+8+3=25 (7)
3x8x3x8x3=1728 (this number equalizes 81 and 99)
72/14=5.1428|571428|571428
(See the missing “7” where the decimal is? )
5+8=13
7+2=9 <—72 again
1+4=5
See what is sitting around the 72? “1314”
1.728x1.618=2.795904
See the connection already?
1728
1618
This new number is a “+1+1”.
“795994”
This is “754”, a 9 exists in each third so the number hides in plain sight.
7 and 54. We already found 7, we are about to find 54 again.
I found this sequence, |46264|
Look at the relation to your DNA numbers:
92529
46264
54345
You see what that is?
5x5=25, 4x4=16, 25+16+3=44
Not only that, the Pi sequence itself gives “54” as (4x4 + 6x6 + 2)
54 (9 as in 2/3**+1/3**=3/3***) combines with the DNA numbers to give 44.
72x2=144, “44 connected above itself”
Remember how no “1” is every alone? This particular 1 has a 44 attached to it (“8” becoming 18 which =9 all over again… that little “1” goes through some massive cycling to becoming a 9).
But I want to see how this fits into the “38383” because that is really important. We have 7, 44, 54, and 72. We also have “754” and “1728”.
3.8383x1.618=6.2103694
That’s “4|369|4” or “377”
6.377x2=12.754
1728/754=2.291777188328
2.2|17771|88328
Let’s stop and think a moment. 754 is the “corner” of the Pi rectangle as “81=99” multiplied by the golden ratio. 1728/754 gives the relation between or of these, which results in a very strange number, one of the strangest I’ve seen, “2.291777188328”.
That is also “878” surrounded by a 2-dimensional breakdown of “18”.
And let’s not forget the “1314” or “4/7” with the 72 in the middle…
And the “12” and “754”, this is
3.7 (1 off from 38)
As 12x7=84 (one off from 83)
92529
46264
54345
My numbers are: 95259, not 92529.
95259
46264
514515
^ That’s the number you are looking for.
Do you know why Pi is 3.1415?
[size=200]514515 Will tell you the whole story.[/size]
5 x 5 = 25
1 + 1 = 2 (I learned a new rule. Do not multiply 1’s, the Universe is not redundant, so let’s respect it.)
4 + 5 = 9
= |36|.
2.|291|777|188|328
A 12 sequence. That’s astonishing.
2 + 8 = 145
9 + 2 = 11
1 + 3 = 4 (Pi)
7 + 8 = 15
7 + 8 = 15
7 + 1 = |8|.
145 + 11 + 4 + 15 + 15 + 8 = |198|. <----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DO YOU SEE THIS?
55 + 15 + 15 + 15 + 8 <------------------------------------------- 116668. Golden Ratio with a surprising twist in 6’s.
Therefore, this is 2.8.
39/93 (61/7) This is the Golden Ratio.
777/777 ← Nice 777. 7 x 7 = 49 + 7 = 56, which gives us 11.
89/98 (11/2) This is a 13. (11 + 13 = 24) 2 x 4 = |8|.
13/31 ← These numbers are related to the cure for cancer…
Half of 83 is [size=200]41.5[/size]
.5x2=1.0
.9x40=36
.8x40=32
.7x40=28
.6x40=24
.5x40=20
.4x40=16
.3x40=12
.2x40=8
.1x40=4
To use your correct numbers,
95259
46264
514515 (696)
525
121
6456 (696)
525
626
114511 (11911, or 292)
From that strange number I found,
2.|12|12|8|4
12 is “3/10"x"1/9”,
This number is therefore a 3|3|2|1 sequence (333)
And look, the base units direct relation as “9”/“10” cycles re-produces the ground of the integers and the universal and man’s pyramids, or rather this pre-integer, pre-Fibonacci ground is actually another way of saying “the 10 wheel in terms of the 9 wheel”:
40/36=1.111111111…
“10”-cycles appear in terms of the 9-cycles which govern them, the 10 comes from the pentagram 72/2=36 two rotations atop each other = 10 spokes of 36 each (360). Remember, the golden ratio defines the pentagram and Pi defines the whole circle-wheel itself. Which is why you are correct that 9 is .9, 8 is .8, etc. This aligns the two cycles to each other.
A ten point wheel?
36-40=-4
72-80=-8
108-120=-12
144-160=-16
180-200=-20
216-240=-24
252-280=-28
288-320=-32
324-360=-36
Look at that… the principles of reconciliation.
Now we are starting to see not just the numbers themselves, but how they are relating.
324 (.9) +36=360 (9/9)
288 (.8 ) +32=320 (8/9)
252 (.7) +28=280 (7/9)
216 (.6) +24=240 (6/9)
180 (.5) +20=200 (5/9)
144 (.4) +16=160 (4/9)
108 (.3) +12=120 (3/9)
72 (.2) +8=80 (2/9)
36 (.1) +4=40 (1/9)
This is what happens when we add in the golden ratio lines in the golden triangles:
