Wouldn’t it be great if this all came out making absolute sense rather than a total scatterbrained mess that needs heavy editing and I’m too lazy to do that? I have other priorities man.
Perhaps related:
Watch This (design/evolution) logos form/pattern
http://youtube.com/post/UgkxLNT7_WxnkxbysyG46gyRYxcdJrkIRnex?feature=shared
formal patterns/cause (all possibilities) — many different “sequences” can all lead to
let’s do some free association:
HudJeffa, the concrete examples and the structure of thought/being; copilot, and the shape of concepts versus the concrete, Cicero and Lange (mentioned in Brentano), Aristotle square of opposition, Socrates and the divided line… shapes and relationships, protein’s tertiary shape denatured equals loss of function (you could also say the opposite, in that coming —back—into shape is gain of function, but it was … wasn’t it? … always there ready to be unlocked), qualities/perceptions have no place (Theatetus p.576… scribbled in Brentano), need tutor
all this shape stuff sounds like geometry, and all that tells me is teleology and as close as you get to Leibniz’ pre-established harmony — especially the video linked above
phenotype quality property
Things with different structure (genotype), exhibiting same property get:
called same name
put in same group
name=group identity (unless it is the name of an individual)
Group members exhibit the same collection of properties/functions (even if through different behaviors or structure patterns) (or otherwise the same structure patterns, or otherwise the same behaviors) without all of their properties, behaviors, or structure patterns being identical/indiscernible (Leibniz)
See also: The Only Way We THRIVE in the End of the World :0)