Purpose of philosophy in the coming war

Western liberal democracy is facing an increasing internal and external dissent in favor of an anarchic Islamic loyalty, which may be said to represent a new freedom. It might be said that Islam is the missing ingredient to Marxism, that a proper absence of the state can only come about by a pervasive religious influence, commanding common terms so a to account for trust, among the human animal which by nature isn’t too trusting as it knows itself to be willful and hidden. Islam is a means given to man to tame himself. Its popularity in a age of abandon and reckless excess is not at all unnatural, and the form of violent abandon that it permits itself secures that many spirited men will take sides against the bloated decadent wall-mart state. It is pretty much defined by itself as “the conquering force”. It’s very hard to stop such a momentum once it takes hold.

Our states are simply not strong enough in their working on the minds of the young to speak of a counterforce - there is only the fear to lose what we have. A will to assert what we are is lacking, because we are not sure what we are. This is the purpose of philosophy in the coming war - nothing ness than to finalize our western culture, to complete the philosophical search, to finally unite science and ethics and produce the worlds first proper real-ideal, a truth that launches humanity into millennia of hope and promise and good simple life among magnificent truths. This is what man wants, massive truths that confirm his being. And these truths have been given to him successfully by all religions – its always such a great success because it’s actually true, that massive truths confirm his being.

And science was still great as long as it described massive truths, more than minuscule uncertainties. What is man compared to minuscule uncertainties? God. This means that he can not grow. Man compared to the galactic proportions is an experiment, something small, intricate and very potentiating, but without definitive aim or limit. One of the tasks of philosophy is to restore science in its grandeur; and since using the concept of valuing, and the valuing tendency resulting in its perpetuation (Self-valuing, or “entity”) the uncertainties can be replaced with logics, and we can again mirror great against small, below to above, and be done with the inconsistencies between Relativity and quantum physics. The work has actually already been done, believe it or not - but as with general Relativity in the first years, only a handful of people understand it.

The role of philosophy then is to actually subject science, something that all religions are desperate to do. Islam was even willing to disavow science to remain valid. If philosophy can show ‘god’ to potentially exist through scientific means, and so show science to be a matter of living power, the attribute of god as omniscient and omnipotent - the way all the great scientists perceived their work, ‘looking into the mind of God’. One might say that once God was dead, so was the incentive to practice science, at least its obsessive intensity of which Newton is the unavoidable example. Philosophy can now finally show what “God” means – it turns out to have two different meanings, which overlap in the “God-awareness”, “nirvana” or “perfect self-valuing” - valuing all of ones universe in terms of ones own “heart” - the point where love, integrity and consciousness are the same.

My conscience asks what state does the European secular person have to be, to experience this. I suppose it can only be described as the ‘rush of understanding’, to which our old mysteries have aspired and from which our sciences were born. “Faith is not good enough” and “God is not great enough” - this is how we stand out and win this war.

Which is why you have stop being such an impetuous, wanton, meshugenah.

James, a new bestseller recommends a new best seller titled ‘Rage against The Meshugenah’ by Danny Evans.

What is so outlandish to hold, the conflict of civilizations as being the struggle to align an inconsistent world. A world where, priorities, power players, ideologies, and ethics mix not exatly with the best congruous patterns, within very divergent populations, in terms of understanding, motives and goals. The Islam as a recurrent power, has gone underground, and if one place is bombed, there is a move to other areas. Even taking out systems of while nations, do not solve the undercurrent, where ‘cells’ reorganize without much undo difficulty. The are strong in their beliefs, because they have a cause, and that cause, or causes, are systemic, and covert attempts at unify a resurgence. the Ottoman Empire has still retained it’s hold on certain disaffected parts of populations, and You do not have to go to these internationalized groups to see this, even within the ultra conservative areas of the U.S., there are pockets of these strong , reactionary views.
The question is, as much as the problem, is, that the middle ofmthe readers are much more prevalent here, and serves as brakes, upon the kind of reactionary terror, which are usually unintelligible , gut level incitements, and capture a very dark element of society, in addition to disaffected young people.

The question we have to ask ourselves, is whether we can not become intelligent moderates, who base their opinions not on incitement of the passion of unreason, but on the concept of realistic social change. That change is inavoidable, in my opinion, is based on the assessment of many who see hidden dangers, even with the possibility of becoming unmanagable, inside the American Bastion. 9-11 will , hopefully, not be forgotten, as news as old as a couple of weeks, soon become unworthy reading material. You do not havent fear insanity, to be able to enter into the unreason of terror, but at the same time, realize, the urgent need to catch it in the bud, before it goes viral. This understanding is absolutely necessary, and not to do so, may mean, that ‘they’ have won.

I have good friends who follow Islam. They are the kindest people I know and have the most beautiful of children. I dont think they are an anomaly. There is no war.

Extreme Islam is increasingly discredited within the Islamic world, as last year’s survey from Pew Research showed. Without popular support, the extremists will inevitably become less and less important. That won’t prevent them from continuing to carry out atrocities, which are overwhelmingly inflicted on their fellow Muslims (and not the West), but a full-scale ISIS takeover of the Islamic World is pretty much inconceivable.

Islam, radical or otherwise, is not an existential threat to the West- unlike the possibility of nuclear conflict during the Cold War period, or indeed Global Climate Change now. The whole ‘War of Civilizations’ thing is absurdly over-hyped. As far as I can see, it’s mainly a way of bolstering the right-wing agenda in Western nations, especially the US.

Make no mistake. There is most definitely a WAR. You are simply kept from knowing the sides, including which one you are fighting for.

I know which war I am fighting and which war I am not fighting.

Yeah, yeah. Everyone knows that they know that they know. They just can’t seem to figure out how they know. Because if they did …

James, you are a man of many assumptions.

Not nearly as much as I was. I learned that the assumptions of the superficial were very seriously unfounded. So I sought a means to know without assuming. Now I assume very little and only when I really have to. But along the way, I found a great many things to no longer assume were there and/or not there.

You were born into a war (medical and psychological). And keeping you blind is a major strategy in that war, pretty much from all sides. And taking advantage of your desire to believe that you can see clear enough, is a big part of that strategy.

As I said, I know which war I am fighting and which war I am not fighting.

War?

It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles;
if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one;
if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.

Sun Tzu -Chap 3.

I note the majority do not know their enemies and themselves in this ‘war’ against Islamism and Islamist terrorism.

The majority 99% of Muslims are good ordinary people, albeit many are vulnerable to be influenced to commit and support a small minority of Islamists’ and their evils.

The critical elements of the ‘enemies’ are very malignant.

Know Your Enemies
The enemies are the following;

  1. A natural small percentile (say 1%) of evil prone people in any group, thus Muslims.
  2. A small percentile of evil laden verses (say 5%) within the holy texts of Islam.
  3. Some elements of evil within the ethos of Islam.

Know Yourself
Know Thyself -Socrates
This is a very complex issue which need to be understood and mastered.
The important point here is not to be too apologetic but be a very critical thinker and educate oneself with philosophy-proper.

The purpose of philosophy is to educate and train the individuals to deal with the above critical elements within a systematic and very interrelated framework.

That is a great summary.

Do you think Islam can be replaced with any ideology (communism, capitalism, atheism, Buddhism, Christianity, marketing, advertising, cinematography, etc)? Even within ILP many think that the moderation rules are evil, unfair, and unjust. Even within philosophy there are what many would consider evil discourses.

What is your measure of what is evil and what is good?

To Know Thyself is not a measure; it is a commandment.

I don’t support any religion, they’re all squeamish fools that like have cock wars and pissing contests.

Oh, it would also be wise to keep in mind.

Here’s all the verses of violence in the Quaran for the precious Islam if you so choose to defend them. Coercion, violence, obligation.

If I wanted to support murderers and violent psychopaths I would have supported Christianity converting and killing pagans back in Rome or Charles Manson and his psychopathic murdering from manipulating. No thanks.

Also, I don’t believe there is a such thing as “evil” or “good” outside of being just labels. I don’t think they are literal.

Is anyone asking you to support religion?
If they are, then tell them to move along.
It is not that difficult.

Islam is, or supposed death. Due to and judging from their texts.

I wonder why other muslim’s don’t try to stop the terrorism… Probably because they believe this garbage too, as if they have a duty to force their belief over everyone else. Or at the very least, let it happen.

This may sound a bit ruthless, but I say just drop a nuke on them and be done with it. I’d of said the same thing in the time and era of the crusades in Rome as well, but that technology was not available to stop their merciless slaughtering of innocence.

And no one give me the guilty bs of “What about the children?”, what about them? You want them growing up being influenced by this trash as well? To believe this absolute violent garbage that they have to assert their dominance over anyone who doesn’t share their belief? To support such conformity and slaughter of difference. This is the absolute slaughter of natural advancement, and natural advancement is what I stand for. It’s either the race moves forward or backwards, and I do not support it going backwards any further.

They have a right to believe, but they don’t have a right to force it over anyone. That is what they teach in their religious scriptures and that is what they have showed in action. Sorry, but this isn’t the caveman era anymore, time to grow up or get out.

It doesn’t sound ruthless… just fanatical and fundamentalist.
You would have been Hitler’s right hand man if you were there at the time.
Kicking those Jews into the gas chambers for the good of all man kind.

Except Jew’s don’t have violent texts that say “Slaughter all non believers in the name of our god”, so no I actually wouldn’t of been Hitlers right hand man. Nice try though and I knew you would use that as an argument. It’s nature at it’s extremist for you. Either kill or be killed, if they want to live in peace they shouldn’t be hypocritical/contradictory and go around the world taunting nations x10 stronger than them and pressing their beliefs of violence where they don’t belong.

Wow! What can I say!

James, where are you when I need you… lol