It has been known to occur – more then often – that persons who’ve had a hard life tend to internally, eventually, become finer then others who’d had a very easy life [in some ways].
This finer quality generally exists within the concepts of appreciation. Having less – teaches them to be less wasteful.
It would appear that humans have it ineffably good compared to other animals, but they are so wrapped up with their own self-aggressions [constantly wishing to overcome one-another], and they get their hearts set up upon moral idealisms and morality [within amoral nature], so that the world soon appears to be a horrible, strife-ridden, dark, death-ridden place.
The human mind must filter out all of the things which it could have spent time appreciating, so that it can be un-satisfied, so that it can try to get things to be “better” then they were.
Coming out of high expectations is often shocking, or even deadly, and this is what often happens to some children as they slide out of their ideal childhoods into adulthood. Health goes. Work piles up. Everything is wrong compared to how it usedto be.
This morality – this expectation – causes struggles within the spirit; struggles against reality, judging reality as unfit, cruel and stupid – these judgments do nothing to the amoral and deff reality, but they surely are stressful upon the heart, turning a potential bliss into a supposed doom-ridden hell.
I’d like to clear up that all forms of life are subjective. “Subjectivity” is individualism. Opinion is a concentration of fact. Supposed “objectivity” is basically a submission to the inanimate world, together with atheist materialism, [most likely].
Both “subjective” and “objective” seem to be rather distorted. At the root, it is the seporation of “thought” and “matter”.
“Thought” is an information structure. All DNA is information. This opinion is able to materialise into an organic form. All forms of structure [even atoms] must first be information, then must self-assemble through the progressive enginuity & force of the Creator.
…
What was I talking about again?
Should I clerify one of the points here?