The wish of the scientists to understand the picture of Existence is great.
That is why, aspiring to understand the structure of micro particles,
they created a new theory "quantum chromodynamics ", “quark model”, 1963.
But the "quantum chromodynamics " theory approves
that it is impossible to see quarks.
“Once upon a time there was a man who was a very good expert on dragon.
He studied versions of dragons, their attributes and habits most carefully .
He could skilfully distinguish one kind of dragon from another.
But, unfortunately, for all his ife he never met any dragon. .
And he did not hear, that someone another should see dragon. .
When this scientist came nearer to old age and got tired from studing dragons,
he began to train the young people, that they also understood this major
area of knowledge – dragonology as well.â€
/ From the book V.P. Shelist “Splinters” /
The dragon theory was created a long time ago.
The quark theory was recently created.
The dragon is a strange beast.
And the quark is also a strange beast.
Both of them are from one myth.
Only different times gave this myth the different names.
Socratus.
Years ago, I attended a lecture at Caltech by Gell-Mann in which he
explained why he developed the THEORY of the quark. He was looking for
a common denomenator to the atomic zoo – a common denominator of
characteristics. He found some (3) and didn’t know what they really
were so he called them Quarks. Later he found more, so he had 6. From
there the theory grew like topsey and develped colors –
BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T KNOW WHAT THE HELL THEY WERE.
Some theory.
(Then there’s “up” “down” — and I’m waiting for “sideways” )
The quark has never been isolated. So instead of admitting there was no
such thing, it was pronounced that it could not escape the nucleus. How
convenient…
Bill uses as an argument that the rest of humanity believes in the quark.
Humanity believed in Ptolemy’s universe for FOURTEEN CENTURIES.
And more recently, practically all of humanity celebrated New Year 2000
as the beginning of a new milleniuim while the FACT is the new
millenium started with the year 2001.
“Humanity” can be very stupid at times.
A more apropos story for the non-existent quarks is the fable about the
King who wore no clothes. Everybody commented on how COLORFUL his
clothes were (the same colors as have quarks) but, alas, the king was
naked.
If anyone wants to read a theory of the sub-particle structure of the
universe, they can go to wbabin.net (The General Science
Journal) --find the list of authors pull down – click on Vertner
Vergon and read the monograph, “On the Quantum as a Physical Entity”.
What is an explanation ? It could be useful for predicting future phenomena according to a present configuration. But after this very simple and direct use of an explanation what other purpose could it serve ? To give us a description or all encompassing description of reality. But imagine if the explanations never ended, that they were always deeper, there were always newer laws, like if always newer particles appeared at higher energy levels, or a never ending sequence of phenomena appeared according to new configurations.
An infinite explanation would end up being like no explanation at all. A DVD has a few billion bytes configured in a certain way and creates a movie. The explanation is directly the description or the sequence of bytes. This relates then directly to an infinite - infinite universe where all is achieved and any wild item, object and laws, universe, reality exists. You just need one bit to create a difference, then a combination of bits can create any universe no matter how far fetched and wild. An explanation is just a quirk, a random group of items with no sense and no meaning, just quirks like the laws of physics, all is equivalent. Explanations are just Paintings like in Art.
)