That’s really messed up, but I don’t get the title of the thread. This woman on trial doesn’t seem like an indicative sample of female psychology in general.
The woman is completely innocent of the crime, as only men are responsible for crimes, for evil, or for anything. So she should go free, completely, and he should go to jail.
This was happening on a regular basis in the UK, due to desperate single mothers shacking up with men like him (this Ken guy) and going along with their plan…
Are you deriving from my post that I am saying she is innocent? I am saying the scene was set, and then two adults took gross advantage of a minor - enough with the assumptions already
First time reading that, I was like, “wtf is a Marxist pedophile? what distinguishes a Marxist pedophile from a normal pedophile?”
Then I went to the link and found that Marxist and pedophile were separate. He’s a Marxist and a pedophile.
Apologies for misconstruing you JSS but it does seem that these types of men come into these single mother’s lives and then take advantage of that situation for their own benefit, but I am not saying that women do not instigate such happenings as there are recent cases here of them having done so… a whole nursery school no less ;?
James, watch if any other females than Magsj enter this thread. None of them will blame women. Women have neural hardwiring which prevents them from “blaming” other women. Women are more connected than men. Women will all band together when you try to push “blame” onto them. Even the suggestion that it’s possible for women to accept any blame, will be met with fierce reactions, even violence. My question is…how did this mental phenomenon evolve over time, to make women…and children such absolutely protected creatures, while men are just the opposite?
What is the result of accepting that ONLY MEN can become responsible, for anything, while women and children continue to remain “blameless” creatures until the end of time? Imagine having this protection, that you can do no “wrong”, ever, or become prosecuted for crimes. What effect would this have, eventually?
Have women become corrupt from unquestioned, evolutionary power and privilege???
http://pohdiaries.com/tag/kenneth-kyle/
My immediate question would be what would drive a man to do this to another human being? And alternatively, what would drive a woman to have this done to her? My guess is that Kyle had suffered from a severe injustice done to him earlier in his life, from which he is still struggling to recover, which would explain his interest in social justice studies, as well as his involvement in SM. (Now, I am not an expert in SM psychology, but I know that power element plays a big role in it). He also spent some time in Asia, a fact which I am wary of. I don’t know in which part of Asia he spent his time, but I do know that in some part of Asia child prostitution is more tolerated than in the West.
So, what kind of woman would be open to doing such things?
My guess, it’s a woman with severe self-image issues. Maybe she went for the autistic boy because she was not accepted by other normal guys. Lower standards could indicate lower self-image. So, imagine a girl with extreme low self-image (and maybe some other issues), being a subject of interest of a PhD PROFESSOR! Was she in love with him? Did they play prove-me-how-much-you-love-me-game? I don’t know. But the extent to which she was willing to go shows that she really wanted to please him. You can see that she would do almost anything for him (to herself and to others)…and I mean… A N Y T H I N G.
Haha, I wondered that too. All this theory-driven paedophilia gets confusing.
The site that Pandora linked has a… less-than-subtle political leaning of its own: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metapedia
I guess it’s important to them to emphasise his politics, since his race can’t be to blame.