Probably, and the cultures, religions, languages changed as humanity spread into divergent geographical areas.
Really ethic groups are mixed and there is not a lot of difference between European people. Just a little.
How much one evaluates the difference in genetics as, is a matter of preference. The difference in culture is not though.
Meanwhile, there are jews from the middle east and and Jews from Europe that are mixed with European type people. Frankly, since Jews can have red hair or be as dark as an Indian that would imply that nothing makes them Jews except the idea that they are.
One could be three quarters of Jewish and yet to be converted to Christianity; or he could be one quarter of Jewish to wear the little cap. So what makes a Jew? Agreed.
Anyway, there is not much difference between people biologically. Polish people and Germans have been mixing for years and what tribe that they came from is not too significant.
The genetical differences between human beings are less than 0.1 to express mathematically. But if what ātribeā people are from is insignificant, then there is nothing to learn about genetics or ontology.
aspacia:
Where is the quote?
So the bibliography is completeā¦ so I take in your claim. But commentingā¦ I donāt think so, Iām not genetical enough to evaluate the credibility, nor that Iām interested enough to divide the Jews up into a hundred groups. Thanks for the quote anyway.
I still await you to give out that Nietzsche one though.
Perfectly understandable not to believe me regarding this quote, as thus far I have not been able to support it. I would take a similar stance as I am a skeptic and cynic.
I will look. I did find several other of my ālostā texts in searching for The Portable Nietzche though, so it was not a waste of time. 
Actually, I tend to agree, we are all members of humanity, albeit with different religions, language, and social norms.
I found it, and it was with my rhetoric section not in history, and it was a history class that used this text.
After dusting off this text, AAAACHOOO, and reviewing all 600+ pages of it, I realize why I disliked the man, he disliked women. 
Probably too many rejections. Hum, it seems like Dr. Dave claimed that Nietzsche had horrible table manners had was asked to leave more than one dining area for slurping soup, licking his fingers, talking with his mouth open. Ick.
I could not find the exact quote, but will send an email to Dr. David, at the U of R for the exact quote.
I found a similar quote in the Portable Nietzsche. āHow I Broke Away From Wagnerā '[. . .] and since Wagner had moved to Germany, he had condescended step by step to everything I despiseāeven to anti-Semitism. [. . .] I was henceforth sentenced to mistrust more profoundly, to despise more profoundly, to be mord profoundly alone [. . .] I have always been sentenced to Germans" (Nietzsche 676).
Works Cited
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Portable Nietzsche. trans. Walter Kaufmann. Penguin Group: New York. 1982.
Basically, it makes my point that Nietzsche hated antiSemites.
Smiles,
aspacia [mispelling of her name intentional]
Such delication to dedicationā¦ do you really dislike Nietzsche?
What I treasure about Nietzsche mostly is this: despite of his sophisticated view on humanity with a touch of pessimessticity, he strived to live happily and kept himself upright and tight. Nietzsche disliked women not out of sexism, not out of his own mother, but out of his own experiences and the generisation of others, with the support of his comprehensive philosophical backbone. He never completely rejected women anyway, nor did he believe that men were much superior. If Luo Salome was bitchy enough to ditch Nietzsche just like that, and later actually married someone as she said that she never would, then how could anyone blame the distrust felt by the most modest and honest man?
Let me run the discourse back on track nowā¦ āI despiseā, can you feel the sincerity and nobility in that phrase out of Nietzsche? If you do, can you then distinguish that from āI hateā as Nietzsche would never actually feel? Nietzsche was different, Nietzsche was a man that none should assciate common human trashy garbages withā¦
Thanks for the quotation, the discussion ends here - your point is made and my point is clearā¦ letās drink to that!
i stand by nietzsche
Hear, Hear, mines Merlot
Let me take a few shots:
pasacia
casapia
sapacia
spacaia
spiaca
Which one is close?
Aspasia, I intentionally mispelled her name. She was a courtesan who hung around with Socrates, Plato, etc. Quite a feat in misogynistic Greece.
Hum, Uniscore: Uni- state of being single or consisting on one. Score has several meaning, a notch, a resutl, a grievance.
What does you pseudonym mean? 
I enjoyed your Merlot last night so I wanted to screw the cork out againā¦ never mindā¦
Uniscore? I thought my pseudonym was Uniqorā¦
Another faux pas.
Regardless, your name is not in the dictionary, what does it mean or who does it stand for??
ā¦
āUniqā is for unique, āorā is for dude.
The generation of civilazation over time is really the only way that it could happen. Think about that for a minute. Anyways, as civilation progresses, the RATIONS, PERCENTAGES, and such quantitative figures are the real differences between one era, century, or millenia in such as comparison to another. Saying anti-depressants are selling āāmore than everāā or something to that effect has no significance since anti-depressents have only been around what? --20, 30 years? ā¦plus whatever Native nations used as their AD that we may not know about. It doesnāt have significance since itās only 20/10,000 years that humans have supposed to inhabited the Earth as a complex organism.
Feel free to PM me for your thoughts, comments, or concerns.
aspacia is totally lost? What are you discussing and who are your responding to? Ah, heck, I have had two classes of wine.
Indeedā¦ I mean: ???uniscore??? Damn, I just canāt get that one out of my head!
Here, have moreā¦ and anotherā¦ last one promiseā¦ ā¦ ā¦ can I take you home now? 
Wow, I am so sorry Heck my maiden name is Candelaria and teachers always made is sound like Malaria.
I am terrible with names, and misspell to boot, āAnd ah is edumacated.ā I am so sorry. I often confuse authors as I am more concerned with the gist of the claims.
Is it Merlot BV is great, and I have never had a bad bottle of BV or Mondavi for that matter.
Call me Asspaidiot on all other posts and I will not react, as it is deserved.
Smiles,
An old Deist
ā¦ I asked you a question so where is my anwser: can I take you home now, Candelaria? ā¦ j/k 
I donāt see no Merlot here in England, here there is stupid aussie Lindeman and some other junk probably bottled by farmers in their toilets on their farms in central Franceā¦ So pour me more, Iām loving it.
Simles/blinks/nods/shakes/ā¦ /Flirts
A Young Atheist 
My son is probably older than you, and my other half and I have a wonderful 18 year relationship, with few tiffs, once every year or two. I am 52 years old, and my other half is 56.
Merlot is a type of wine, not the brand, like a cabernet or a rhine wine. Most wineries make merlot. Not all make a chardonney, as it is difficult to produce.
Yes, the UK does not have much in the way of wines, and actually our Northern and Southern California wines easily compete with France. We once purchase some inexpensive Gallo in the UK once, and it was much sweeter that what we purchase here. Australia makes some nice wines that do try to compete with BV and Mondavi, like you said Lindeman and perhaps Black Swan, but they lack the body of our everyday wines, the $8.99 a bottle type.
We cannot afford the really expensive wine, sometimes pop for the $35.00 a bottle for special occasion, but only for very special occasions.