Race - fact or fiction

I feel like saying thanks… whoever you weirdos are.

You are just making an arse of yourself.

RNA came first.

Then DNA. DNA = stability, steady states, long term preservation of data. RNA = flexibility.

The phrase “mission objectives” implies that DNA has some kind of anthromorphic agency of its own, but its more of a figure of speech. In reality, DNA is more like a “zip folder” containing a payload, only after the zip file is extracted is there any sentient agent or something occurring. Its like if you compressed an Ai into a compressed folder and then it is not possible to run the program until you extract the folder, and after you extract the folder you are able to run the Ai and it becomes sentient.

The genetic distance between Homo Sapiens and Homo Erectus is about 0.17 percentage, while the genetic distance between Africans and Eurasians is 0.23

Genetic variance between Europeans and Africans residing in the Sahara is 0.153

The genetic variance between wolves and coyotes is also 0.153

How is that helping your case? You’re just further making my point. Call it the blueprint of a building. That’s only going to happen if there is a mind that can conceive of the building when the building doesn’t exist yet. Otherwise, it can only happen if there is an omnitemporal mind that conceives of the building from start to finish (at every phase of existence) because it holds the entire process in its mind as an expression of its mind.

My “point” was towards RealUn merely to mention that DNA has more of a “purpose” besides reproduction.

If you want to discuss how life itself is a consent violation and is holding souls hostage, I’m down for that. I discuss it in my thread called “your body is a black hole”, you’ve seen that.

It is quite clear to me that we are at this point here now because it is the direction, the programming of natural and artificial selection and that is which guides us here.

It is like how a life content with itself would have died off long ago. So the misery continues. It is like how if some species just smoked pot all day before building some Ai to carry their ass around, they would go extinct. So you are now left with souls being held hostage by some result of natural and artificial evolution. In a certain way, you could indeed view it as some sort of mindless replication and reproduction, like some cosmic virus carrying its misery to souls.

…what if we said his name like this? ….UnReal

OK now I’ll actually read your post.

1 Like

Life is consent structure. How can it be a consent violation?

So you’re saying that we only reproduce from a lack, from a feeling that the situation is lacking something? I’m not saying you’re 100% wrong, but is it not conceivable that some of us want to make more of what is good because… why stop if it’s a good thing… why not just keep going with it? Why not multiply it into all its conceivable instantiations?

If the problem is that people‘s consents are being violated, why not surround all the violators (or get surrounded by them, just by the sheer fact that you are diverging from the status quo they would prefer to maintain) and just show them how it’s supposed to be until they get with the program?

What if the harder it gets, and the more stubborn and hardheaded they are, the more you view it as a challenge and an opportunity for growth, and a bigger win when you overcome… and that overcoming is what finally (if ever) dislodges their heads from their butts?

[Disclaimer… this is just brainstorming, or thought-experimenting here: What if part of winning the game is letting non-leavers take us out of it? Maybe beyond this game there’s something better that we’re not going to experience until they’re the only ones left in this game? I’m not saying we motivate them to take us out. We want them to leave with us, but everyone has to leave by being taken out by the non-leavers (or dying naturally), and not because we did anything bad, but only because we did everything according to self=other. You can’t hasten this sort of collective win if you take yourself out, because that is a violation of self=other. I’m not saying you would go to hell necessarily, I’m just saying the collective win wouldn’t happen if all the leavers left by suicide. And only after they take us out, and see our overcoming, will they experience a collective head-dislodging from their butts? … the likes of which are never before seen, and will never be seen again (there is nothing new underwear the REAL sun don’t shine).]

Survival and Reproduction are much the same function and end though. Mammals mature…so that they may reproduce again. Between cycles of birth and death, reproduction is implied within the survival. You cannot survive without reproducing; you cannot reproduce without surviving.

Although I agree with your deeper premise and implication – if Life could find a different means of surviving other than reproduction, then it would try it. That’s what the dream of Immortality is. Mankind imagines “living forever” as a manifestation of such an alternative.

You’ll have to ask Scalptor what he meant. I found it interesting that he defined “You” (referring to himself) as his DNA though. Then he has the gall, as a left-liberal, to accuse others of “Racism” whilst simultaneously defining himself through his DNA and not his ideological beliefs. He outed himself there. He exposed what he truly believes, Like other Leftists, they identify with their own Race, look down upon ‘Coloreds’, and then accuse their political rivals of their own feelings of guilt and shame.

It’s an emotional ‘unloading’ mechanism that serves multiple functions, especially one that satisfied a Holier than Thou complex.

1 Like

yea but heterosexual reproduction is not cloning, the dna is not an exact replication, but combined chromosomes of 2 people. it seems like a vague attempt to reproduce but not a real reproduction and the new dna is always different than before

So you’re saying that we only reproduce from a lack, from a feeling that the situation is lacking something? I’m not saying you’re 100% wrong, but is it not conceivable that some of us want to make more of what is good because… why stop if it’s a good thing… why not just keep going with it? Why not multiply it into all its conceivable instantiations?

Not exactly. I am saying life is a virus, parasite etc. much like metroids or sa-x parasite. It drags consciousness along for the ride and souls have no say in it.

What im saying is, natural selection, sexual selection (what I call "artificial selection), and Darwinism, doesn’t select for happiness. It selects for fear and utility. So only the malcontents reproduce.

It doesn’t select for total unhappiness.. the organism must have some lack of fear in order to scavenge outward, the organism must have some motivation in order to scavenge. What it selects for is slavery - an organism that is not obedient to hunger or its sex-drive: an organism that feels no pain, dies off, does not reproduce. If an organism felt happy all day every day and felt no pain then it would go extinct. In this way Life tethers souls to its evolution. That is why souls do not find true happiness in this realm, because life evolved to be discontent

If the problem is that people‘s consents are being violated, why not surround all the violators (or get surrounded by them, just by the sheer fact that you are diverging from the status quo they would prefer to maintain) and just show them how it’s supposed to be until they get with the program?

People do violate other’s consent, but it is not just that. Life itself is a consent violation because souls got sucked into some body like a black hole. Like, a soul never asked for “Please suck me into this body, give me childhood disease, make me go to school for 7 hours a day and give me back problems in these hard school seats! Inject me with your needles and vaccines so that I might avoid a horrible illness. Make me obey every law that is written! When I am an adult, make me a slave, make me work 5 days a week or more, for low wages! Indoctrinate me with woke DEI values and politics! And entertain me with corporate slop and drivel! Let videogames have barely any maps or content, so that I might play only the same maps, day after day! Let me be a debt-slave the rest of my life, so that I might rent a property for many years, only to own it and have a little yard, with very little freedom to do anything but what the city tells me! Let me be bothered and annoyed by random sounds from the city or my neighbors as well! I won’t complain! Let me cherish only the good of life, so that I might praise and be thankful for life! A life I never asked for or consented to!”

[Disclaimer… this is just brainstorming, or thought-experimenting here: What if part of winning the game is letting non-leavers take us out of it? Maybe beyond this game there’s something better that we’re not going to experience until they’re the only ones left in this game? I’m not saying we motivate them to take us out. We want them to leave with us, but everyone has to leave by being taken out by the non-leavers (or dying naturally), and not because we did anything bad, but only because we did everything according to self=other. You can’t hasten this sort of collective win if you take yourself out, because that is a violation of self=other. I’m not saying you would go to hell necessarily, I’m just saying the collective win wouldn’t happen if all the leavers left by suicide. And only after they take us out, and see our overcoming, will they experience a collective head-dislodging from their butts? … the likes of which are never before seen, and will never be seen again (there is nothing new underwear the REAL sun don’t shine).]

Hell is other people. Jesus promised a 1000 year utopia on earth, nothing more. Finite and back to the misery after the vacation is over.

I say we wait for the ASI to build us the sacred rings… until then we should strive to make the most of it, as you implied. Build utopia and paradise on earth. It is uncertain if the Halo rings can even be built, why count on it?

One of the symptoms of being infected by a gene-based parasite, is a gradual disconnection from reality…zombification it is called. Look into it…it’s a real thing.

Well, one of the symptoms of being infected by a meme-based parasite - propagated linguistically - is a gradual disconnection from perceptible reality.
The individual begins to doubt his own senses…preferring the ideology, written in words, to what he perceives.
Race-denial, is an example…
Gender denial is another.

See how many of the infected, on this very forum, define the terms they use.
That’s semiotic zombification.

Perceiving patterns is anathema to the aprasite-meme that has successfully masked itself, passing as belonging to the host it has semiotically infested, and uses as its proxy.
Zombification.
The infected host no longer recognizes its own kind - its judgements are reduced to a binary: infected, not-infected.
It begins behaving, thinking, in self-destructive ways. It promotes the alien, rather than its own kind.

Let me see the good in all the struggles that made me stronger and able to help others become stronger. Thank you for the joy of overcoming. Thank you for bringing out the qualities that don’t come easy in myself and others.

1 Like

.
Oops.. accidentally posted

1 Like

Some core-sections of DNA is replicated consistently per ‘Specie’. For example, whether male or female, humans preserve the coding for 2 hands, 2 arms, 1 torso, 1 head, 2 legs, 2 feet, etc. The base “Human” design and composition is copied. Species do not magically, randomly produce other species. However, as you say, it’s not perfect. There are mutations, most of which do not survive in utero, and are miscarried. Genetic malfunctions do occur.

I kind of see it the other way around.

Consciousness, the product of brain organ and nervous system, acts parasitically upon the blood stream of its specie & body. So consciousness is a by-product of a type of internalized parasitism. Consciousness ‘latches onto’ the body, or so it seems

1 Like