Sydney had a race riot over Sunday, and I am not involved in any way.
But I must say, the riot is the most glorious struggle for existence of a nation in seek of nationhood built upon the immutable foundation of racial integrity. The race, is linked to our biological paternal instinct. We look after our own kids and not others, because our kids continue our racial line. Kids from interracial marriages are less happy as statistics have shown because they do not completely resemble the racial characteristic of either parents. They are like a jar of water that is halffull. which is neither full nor empty. To act against discrimination would be acting against our natural paternal instinct, which is the love of our OWN children. The theory of ownership I adovated earlier applies in this instance as well.
What I find most distressing about inter-racial mixing is this, not only does the child not resemble either the parent. but in black white cases, the white becomes a residue, so if it is white woman then she became a carrier of an alien sperm, much like the movie Aliens in which humans are used as carriers for aliens, and the humans die. Much in the same way, the carrier after giving birth continues none of her characteristic. much like a human giving birth to an alien. so in effect, she died childless. in terms of white men. well, they sowed their seeds on rock, for the seed does not blossom into extensions of themselves but as alien beings, foreign to their existence. On the black side, the child is not pure black, so the spirit of Africa dies with his birth.
A mother sees the race being continued in the child or else she is cuckold. and she loves her child because of the child’s racial ties with her. it is supremist to love my own child? is paternal instinct a suppremist instinct?
One of the most upsetting thing I heard in Hotel Rwanda in which Tuzzis and Hutus kill one another is that the Hutu hotel manager said 'if the world does not come and help us we will shame them into helping us’
This remind me of the recent aid efforts, is the rest of the world being ‘shamed’ into helping the starving in africa. the whole shame tactics is the tactics of a beggar. and the hotel manager thought he thought of a great plan.
I know that Sydney had a race riot - my friend got caught up in it. Technically she wasn’t in Sydney, but in Cronulla, a suburb of Sydney where she is staying. Apparently her and a friend thought that the gathering on the beach was just a party and it wasn’t until they were right in the middle of it all that they realised what was going on. They had to beat a hasty retreat after my friend, somewhat unwisely, picked an arguement with a very large local racist…
She also said that she spoke to a cop who was standing nearby, not getting involved. She asked him what the problem was and he said that it was the ‘lebboes’ and muzzoes’ (the Lebanese and Muslims) and that the locals (who are all descendents of European immigrants, of course) weren’t happy. My friends asked “Do you mean that it’s a race riot?” The cop’s laidback response (so utterly Australian and only really works with the accent) “Aw yeah”.
We laughed our asses off on the phone about this, imagining that the cop would have given this response no matter what the question.
“So that group of drunken, drugged up thugs are just going to find the nearest non-white person and beat them half to death?”
“Aw, yeah”
they begin acting like it is their country, and soon you get them burning thousands of cars each night…
And Muslims claim Islam is a religion of “peace”. so much for that. I’m not against anyone being a Muslim – it is their right. But don’t ever, ever say your religion is peacefull. It is not Christians or Buddists, or Hindus, or Mormons who are crashing planes into buildings and constantly blowing themselves up in the name of their diety.
I am not meaning to sound as If I’m ranting against Islam. What I am trying to point out is that these riots are usually the result of two things:
the rioters have the wrong view of how their government should work, and what their government is responsible to provide for them.
AND
The government has the wrong view of what rioters think of the government, and the wrong understanding of how it (the government) is responsible to provide for the rioters.
No, it’s ‘Christians’ (I’m dubious as to whether they are Christians, just as I’m dubious as to whether the Muslimists are muslims) who go around murdering doctors that perform abortions…
Plenty of violence has been committed in the name of religions other than Islam. However a lot of Muslims that I’ve met have tended to get aggressive and stupid when their beliefs are called to account so perhaps there is an inherently aggressive element to it…
Many years ago I was talking to a visiting Hindu holy man about the strikes we were experiencing at that time. He responded by saying that when a government encourages the masses to become greedier and greedier and to consume more and more, it can hardly be surprised when they revolt for more money.
I thought of this when I heard of the recent Sydney riots.
Years of fearful, threatening government rhetoric has now backfired and the government has lost control. They are now trying distance themselves from the ‘us and them’ ‘clash of civilisation’ rhetoric they used to get us into a war, stip us of our civil liberties and to gain more power for themselves.
They’re now frantically pulling out the ‘happy multicultural’ and ‘unaustralian’ slogans out again to water down the flames they themselves have cynically fuelled for years.
There have been dozens of large scale riots that have NOTHING to do with Muslims and many more riots that have relatively NOTHING to do with religion.
I don’t see this as being linked to Religion. In 1992, Los Angeles had a very famous race riot. The city burned because of the “injustice” of Rodney King’s “oppressors” being found “not guilty.”
Riots are very easily justified to those who believe they are being oppressed. Not to mention that there will always be a few that will take advantage of a situation: nearly 45% of those arrested were Hispanic and about 10% of those arrested were White. There was about $1billion in stolen goods and burned buildings.
And Black people claim to be peaceful? So much for that…
Well, I’ll give you that the riots in France were probably not linked to religion, but what about everything else?
There has only been one period of rioting in France, and yet people of the same religion are blowing themselves up, killing innocent bystanders, all in the name of Allah…and they are doing it on a daily basis.
France might be about religion. I would like to know if Islam keeps the people poor there due beliefs about fitting in with other people. If that is the case then they are protesting their situation but actually creating it at the same it.
Over the last few years, groups of Lebanese/middle eastern youths have been hanging out around Cronulla beach (usually the weekends in their hotted-up cars) harassing women, intimidate people, and generally behave like arsehole hoons.
Often the volunteer lifeguards are left to stop the thugs from bullying and sexually harassing people on the beach and it must have been something like this that caused the two lifeguards to be bashed.
A call went out to reclaim the beach last Sunday and, although it started as a picnic, a hot summer’s day, lots of alcohol, and a handful of racists egged the crowd into hunting down anyone who looked like they might be one of the Lebanese hoons… and the bashings started.
The following night about 80-100 Lebanese/middle eastern thugs went down a few streets trashing cars and bashing anyone (and stabbing one) they came across… and on it goes. One group attacks; the other seeks revenge.
This would be bad enough on its own but over the last several years, there’s been a major Lebanese rape case where several women were raped and called “white slutsâ€, sporadic violence by middle eastern gangs elsewhere including drive-by shootings – a police station was shot up in one drive-by – and of course, the fall-out from 911.
Obviously the locals have had enough, so while the call to reclaim the beach looks racist, it is, by and large, anti-thug – 'though its quickly becoming racist.
(Interestingly, Cronulla is the place where Captain Cook made first contact with the Aborigines… and we know how that race riot turned out)
That was a good account. Now I can understand why the locals went a little crazy.
I really think that cultural research needs to be done before bringing foreigners, in large numbers, into a country. It’s my opinion that the US largely ruined its potential culture through slavery, and other attempts to use clashing cultures as cheap labor. You end up with bitter people that you had little in common with as your unhappy neighbor.
Also, people from the mid-east are not of another race. They have much the same bone structure as a white person. In fact, there are some north Africans that are very dark brown and yet have the same exact bone structure are very Nordic people. So, it was not a race riot, but a culture clash and I think that sends a different message.
The Lebanese I see on the news are 100% Australian. I’m sure many would have roots going back a couple of generations. This is not a language, religion or culture problem, this is simply about thugs and respect. It would be exactly the same if a group of bikies fronted up every weekend and behaved badly. By concentrating on immigration and other issues, we miss the point.
This episode looks like it has a way to go before running out of steam but at least the Cronulla council has put forward an idea to encourage Lebanese youth to take up volunteer lifesaving. Yes it sounds funny…. Lebanese Lifesavers? but it may be a good idea.
I think the problem lies in perceptions. I think these hoons feel like outsiders. They are not part of the lifesaving fraternity; they’re not part of the surfing community and they not part of the local family groups or local rugby/league teams.
The only thing left for them to do is to hang out in cars or move in bunches up and down the beach harrassing women and threatening anyone who gets in their way. For entertainment, they egg each other on until it gets ugly.
Those kind of people look like lots of other type of people and it’s my guess that they are the prejudiced ones, because out of pride, they cling to there nationality.
What’s wrong with you? The Lebanese are not a race. That is a nationality.
Did you know that people from the mid-east have the same bone structure and whatnot as white people? If you are going to talk about race you have be able to identify human differences via biological examination.
The Aryans moved through North Africa and basically that’s what you have there even if their skins has grown darker.
hahahah, no no no. racial understanding is simple. you only have to look and you’ll understand that they are darker, more muscular, different eye brows, different nose, the Lebanese belong to the Arab race.
There is no such thing as the Arab race. If you take middle-eastern people and strip them of skin they are the same as white people. Thinds like hair quality and whatnot are also marks of race. White people have straight or curly, black people wooly, Asians have ultra-straight hair, and the Arabs have both like white people. You aren’t informed. If you are to be a good racist, then you need to study up.
Haven’t you ever heard of the Black Irish, or even the Welsh? Supposedly people from parts of Britian may have come from ancient Spain or even the mid-east. Even the Roman Tacitus speculated about this.
Yes it sounds funny…. Lebanese Lifesavers? but it may be a good idea.