Namaste? Does your name begin with a B?
Blacks think they have a right to trial by combat with the cops. Until they lose, then the cop was “racist.”
- Adolf Joe Biden
That’s pretty much what happened.
What do I have to be embarrassed about. I’m a six foot tall white man, blond, blue eyes, clean living, involved in philosophy, exmilitary. I stand closer to your pathetic ideal than you likely do by coincidence of birth. But I’m intelligent enough to know the greater bulk is utter worthless trash, who I genetically am isn’t ideology. Nazis are the lowest and weakest aspect of the left. I note the KKK is even modeling itself now after the ACLU. Honestly, you fuckheads on the left are interchangeable in ideology, but I’m not too thrilled about having a political system where all sides on the local level are held in check by mutual assured destruction. All I need is for the KKK and Black Lives Matters crowds to clash and bomb each other out, hold 99% identicle beliefs, every bit as ignorant, only difference is they don’t like one another’s skin tone. Fuck that retarded shit.
You definitely do use Stormfront’s phraseology a lot. It can’t be coincidence. Your phrases are almost exactly the same. Both exist on the extreme fringes of the left. You should just merge your stupid movements together, go out in the country on some farm and race war one another in pay per view gladiatorial matches. Outside the races being the wrong color for both sides, your largely the same. Same socialist bullshit, sand in your clit whining.
Notice the main person agreeing in your assessments, is a damn guy who cut his dick off and dresses as a woman. That should be a indicator something is fucking off about your master race ideology. I earnestly hope Trixie (UP) becomes the leader of your little Aryan Nation. I will write some damn good references to get him elected, and invite friends to your little parades, just to watch the drag queen float at the end, and watch Trixie earnestly struggle through a speech talking about Ducks and true Aryan mentality. That is some fucking popcorn entertainment there, worthy of Jerry Springer… he can have a whole show of just Supreme Leader Trixie, with you dressed in a Nazi uniform behind stiff legged and stone face, yelling Heil and saluting. That be some prime time laughs.
Everyone here will support that shit and laugh our asses off as it continues on. See fucking cartoon unicorns dress as Gestapo and rape each other anally in propaganda posters.
Considering I am Aryan, I don’t see any reason why not. My face is more oval looking than those ancient Germans.
Aryanism is about promoting the oval face, we simply want people to be beautiful and happy and beautiful oval face creatures. It don’t matter what skin color, Indians are dark skin but they are Aryans and have oval faces. You can be blue colored and still be Aryan. Don’t need no blonde hair.
Aryanism is about promoting the goodness of animals, and the health of the music. And noble ideals.
Preach it sister. Yeah… whatever. Go convert them to your truth.
The truth is universal. If one cannot appreciate the beauty of an oval face, one must question whether it can appreciate the face any beauty at all.
So be it. Are you going to fight for the leadership of the Klan like how they did it in the Kevin Costner movie “The Postman”?
If you do, wear low heels that day, don’t want that grand imperial wizard knocking you off balance wearing high stilettos.
I am wizard, but not that kind of Wizard.
Never was a fan of the klan and it has nothing to do with Aryanism.
White supremacy is not Aryanism, some Aryans aren’t even white.
Sounds very zealous.
Kumbaya!
What can I say, blond and blue eyes are no protection against being born with a muddy head.
And you know with all the mixing, once pretty good indicators for intelligence are getting less reliable.
But actually, I do think your IQ is probably even above 100, it’s other psychological qualities which make you so confused.
You remind me of a conspiracy nut.
Don’t misunderstand, I’m not talking about you talking about UFOs, I’m thinking in terms of psychology.
They read something here, read something there and they don’t give a shit if it fits together or how plausible it is, they just gotta blurt it out for somebody, anybody to read it. So that they feel heard.
By the way, it has become a sport on those, as you say, ‘left-wing’ sites like Stormfront and others (some which I do read) to tell actual lefty journalists strange and obviously contrived narratives, to get them to print them in their hysteria. The objective is to destroy their credibility, which they do already destroy themselves but why not help them out.
So, I wouldn’t believe all that you read and hear from your ‘right-wing’ media, like MSNBC when it comes to, well, anything but in particular about those right-wing, eh, left-wing, whatever groups.
How is proposing psychological connections, be they correct or false, conspiracy?
I could say the Eyeball is directly wired through our taste of smell before processing it’s data as vision. It would be anatomically wrong as fuck, but wouldn’t qualify as a conspiracy theory.
Now, if I said the government was wiring it that was in new Burns via prenatal pills developed on that planet Niburu for mind control and a population takeover, that would be a conspiracy. Merely stating anatomical facts, right or wrong, about how the mind works, isn’t. That’s theorizing on how cognition works anatomically, not conspiracy.
Hello Mr. Ferguson
Body cams are a good idea. On that you will find common ground with the President, but there are a couple of issues. One is that the existence of video should not create the expectation that every video has to make it to the newsfeed or TMZ the night of an incident. Everyone has rights including police officers. Evidence is evidence and should be treated accordingly. The second issue is with the operation of the cameras. For example, who turns on and off the camera? If it is the officer, then it leaves the possibility to doubt the evidence because a guilty officer might switch off their camera at any time during the day when they know they are about to do some shaddy shit. Then there is the custody procedure of how the cameras are handled. Would it be possible to have the camas transmit a signal to a regulatory body like IA?
True. For example, would the riots have occurred if Milwaukee Police Chief David Clarke was not also a Trump surrogate? Trump, who by the way is polling at a virtual zero among African Americans?
I disagree with your opinion of Rosa Parks. She took a risk and so she deserves her fame…unlike the Kardashians of today. There is also being “pissed” and “righteous indignation” that lead to fairness and justice. MLKJr wanted a future when his descendants would not be judged by their color of their skin but by the content of their character, but, since they are still to be judged by the color of their skin, I don’t think that he would mind systemic safeguards to protect them from those who make a judgment on their character based on the color of their skin.
It is nowhere fucking near bro’. You need to check your history. We are not talking of government mandated desegregation, being denied the right to marry whomever you love because of the color of your skin, being considered less than a man when it came to voting, being considered cattle-like with a black person having the legal right to sell your but to another black person. This is the tainted history of the United States, so I don’t buy the equivalency. That there is a sort of reverse racism against white people by black people? I don’t doubt it. As I said before, even brown people can be racist against other brown people…or white, or Asian…etc. But it is not the same. One is a racism from strength and the other racism from a position of weakness. One is a matter of offense and the other a matter of defense.
I disagree. I think that he was against discrimination and fought, in his own way, to promote fair treatment for black people, not measured by financial success but by judicial success, by how they are judged and held accountable. The disagreement he would feel with those supposedly fighting for BLM is the means that they are using. Riots? Shooting the police? Not his style, nor Ghandi’s style.
Non-lethal weapons. That is what I am always wondering. In prison they have better equipment to resolve a confrontation with both the good guy and the bad-guy walking away. Tasers, rubber-bullet guns…nowehere to be found. It is as if police were being sent to do everything, to deal with everything, with the gun as their only tool. There is a saying, isn’t there?: “If all you have is a hammer then every problem looks like a nail”.
That is actually a very good idea.
I know. Which brings me to my own idea: Why not mandated stints in the military, like other countries do? Why not make boot camp mandatory for every able person as part of their application for federal aid, be it for food stamps or Pell Grant?
I just wrote a reply, it got deleted when the site logged me out, will try to again tonight, not ignoring you.
I’m going to break my rule of not breaking it up into quotes because I don’t want to be devastated seeing my post here lost again:
Cops don’t have anymore right to privacy than any employee does elsewhere, minimum. You don’t contradict this, but at the same time it very much limits how much privacy they have.
End explanatory example:
Would any police chief be in the wrong for riding around in silence in the back of a police car, just observing, telling the cop to carry on with their shift, standing over his shoulder, if the chief so desired to? You can argue that’s a waste of office, he has better things to do, but it likewise is damn well their right to sneak up on a cop in a parking lot or road parked to see if they are napping or fucking around on the phone. Standards and observation of his men working, providing training and oversight is his main areas of concern. We don’t send our mayors, judges, city managers or city councils out to do that shit, we elect or appoint a Police Chief to do that.
He doesn’t require a warrant to look over that (bodycam) footage, can offer it up to a prosecutor, reviewed by a ethics lawyer, etc.
Only things I think should be protected is when they enter into someone’s house, especially on a false alarm or very minor situation (code violation, if they are so lame as to cite someone for not mowing the grass)… a household privacy shouldn’t be violated just because The Freedom of Communication act exists on the federal level (with whatever varients existing state and local). We inherited a concept of warrants and privacy from the British, we enforce a larger synthesized idea from various constitutional clauses (via syllogism of other clauses {so and so says this here and here, therefore…} isn’t actually a actual right to privacy clause per say) that there is a right to privacy. I think in 99% of murder scenes, without a reasonable explanation, the right to protecting the innards of the crime scene from public scrutiny isn’t valid… We can’t competently legislate against and propose new laws without good data, crime scenes matter, as well as motives and psychology. This doesn’t fall on cops though. Only time I would say not publishing a cop is when he is in a shitter. A right to information request shouldn’t expose the some officer’s cock pissing in a urinal, or kissing his wife at the house on a lunch break. But actual use of a police car, how you get from A to B to C, that’s rightfully the community’s concern. Was the cop flipping out on the phone with a beserko wife, or helping a elderly woman across the street, prior to a shooting? That can determine someone’s psychological state.
Body cams are 100% They don’t have the ability or Orient and Observe like a set of eyes can, doesn’t pick up what the officer is doing, how his eyes are darting around. The OODA Loop would be a essential concern here.
It doesn’t show what department SOPs are, doesn’t show exactly how the officer is juggling protocol against situation awareness and past experience. But if I was on a jury, or policy maker, or philosopher, or historian, I would certainly want this sort of access.
I believe body cams have memory sticks built in, you can get pretty advanced storage on the cheap these days. I’m guessing like radios, Lithium battery based. Most are chess mounted, some are glasses or helmet mounted. Side effects of the Land Warrior System, nowhere near as advanced, but I’m sure it will try to advance in parallel over time.
Pease don’t delete… more posts to come…
I never looked at his political beliefs, don’t much care about the reporting on thus upteenth anti-police riot. Looked more of the same from initial reports, I don’t waste time reading every detail of his life as that doesn’t explain the riot. If he or his police force caused it, I would investigate it, but it wasn’t the cause. The cause is the Democrats long exploiting a White to Black divide within their party, and drumming up a race war for political gain.
I strongly recommend if the blacks feel disempowered, if the insist of voting as a monolithic block… which I think is antidemocratic and disturbing, but if they insist, to break ties with the Democratic Party on a local level, and pool their votes together to elect local officials, and offer their votes up to building coalitions on the state and national level. Blacks as Democratic Party members in Milwaukee do not matter at all in the US. White Democrats certainly don’t care for them, Republicans dispair of making enroads, so effective they have no damn vote. As swing voters, ones notorious for going after their own interests, you bet both parties would flock to them. Alot more will come their way. They also wouldn’t be suffocating under a very limitating and discrimitive ideology, dictated from a national party… they would be more open to accepting economic and social ideas once taboo. A lot of police chiefs, white or black, tend to advocate more conserative views, as cobservative polices are rooted more in goid oeconomia of household and community management, and not utopuan socialism. They see the long term cost of failed policies daily. An example, the Police Chief of Detrout openly embracing gun ownership after seeing how badly the older liberal anti-gun policies afflicted his community. Absurd on the national democratic level, but does wonders on rebuilding a community’s mutual self reliance and individual household security.
I dislike the idea of political parties period, like John Adams, but if we are going to have them, think rotten organizations like the Democrats have to go first, and be replaced by local politucs building upwards, not national politics forcing downwards. Parliamentry republics build coalitions all the time, I honestly dont get why a presidential republic can’t.
Rosa Parks didn’t like in a era of sensational crash media like the Kardashians did. I’m still stumped how the Kardashians became famous, I returned from Iraq, and she was everywhere, nobody had a explanation.
Martin Luther King did heroics, risked his life against violent people. Rosa Parks sat her ass on public transportation, 99.9999 percent chance she would just get booted off the bus, cited… at worst a short stint in county jail. I by no means do not desire to paint her as a weak person, I fully get why she embraced her new found status, wasn’t egoism but willingness to carry her image as a cause, but in the end if the day, her Heroics were incredibly minor… she was uncooperative on a bus by not moving when asked. People do that all the time to this day. She had a more dignified and enlightened reason, but I’ve seen self righteous people rejrct the idea they had to switch seats or get up on Greyhounds and City Buses. It is why we gotta slap signs up saying it is the law to give up seats. She didn’t do much but sit her ass still, it was the media that decided she was a worthy case to back. The Kardashians… fuck dude, honestly… I don’t know if anyone made that choice to back Kim, and if they did, shame on them.
Martin Luther was willing to due for his beliefs, to be beaten, thrown in jail, etc. Rosa was… willing to get dragged off the bus? Hard to compare in scope. We produced undoubtedly a lot of Rosa Parks, but just she got famous. We only seemed to of made one Martin Luther King. He was far, far more important to our society. I know he was influenced by Gandhic but we shouldn’t compare them too closely, Gandhi was a terrible racist. Most people are unaware of this. Martin used his techniques of non-violence, didn’t embrace his whole ideology, and don’t think anyone should honestly. I fully recommend reading the writings and ideas of both, but caution against saying Gandhi was as great, Gandhi doesn’t come close to Martin Luther King. I find much to criticize in Ghandic but can’t find much in King. He is a genuine American Hero. Think he might of had affair, never looked much into that. Only blemish I know.
He was a pastor, and did advocate the basic Christian stance on Oeconomia… household and community rules on building up a community into good order… prosperity is a aspect of that. Equality wasn’t always, but just treatment and recognition we are all equal and naked before the lord, not deserving of persecution or malice, injustice and neglect was. He embraced the ideal better than any thinker in the 20th century. Very easy to overlook he was a christian pastor, and took that role seriously. The end results aren’t the same as demands of Equality and Fraternity in a Revolutionary French sense, Christians don’t force that, we make it our ideal from the bottom up, from the individual introspectively to our family relations, to the community, our institutions, and state. Can’t really enforce it as a constitutional clause, can’t demand equality, bit you can seek to demolish what is introposed against building a better person or society… Needless restrictions on community from coming together, like in mandated segregation. You can’t get people to like one another by forcing cohabitation, or taking money from one account and shoving it in another.
That is essentially why the US always encourages Europeans to deploy their troops in conjunction, US is response to European stagnation in NATO had to take up the strongest war footing, so equiped our soldiers to survive a mass Soviet invasion for several weeks while the US and wee little Canada mobilized and sent our mainland armies to Europe to counter attack. European armies are a joke, they only relatively recently ended their draft armies. Most mech infantry and tanks. But they got excellent riot police, and because they are more socialized, top down societies, must use them a lot more that we do. When the US is asked to go on a peacekeeping mission, we say no 9 times out of ten. Why? We train most troops to kill. They are equipped to kill. They aren’t very respectful when they pluck you, and our detention accomidations, while not inhumane usually (the detention center latrine in Iraq at my base had a inhumane latrine, I always forced the Romanian contractors to clean that horror when I worked it, was locked up on the inside, nobody officially set up a system to clean it. We never beat people, you were left alone, but that fucking toilet could kill a man by smell alone), are better than what I currently live in… our guys, outside of MPs, are not trained for police work, beyond dropping riot gas and laying out some barb wire.
Police make excellent use of military vehicles, I’m opposed to Obama’s demand to demilitarize the police force, he is much the cause for militarizing it, given his race emphasis instead of America emphasis sparked these pointless wars. Ferguson would of been much, much worst had cops not felt secure enough to do their jobs once the riots started. A armored vehicle is great when up against snipers or gunmen. It is a place to retreat to, gets you out of violence, you can hold a detainee in one safely, get good overhead view and use them to break up craziness. They don’t have 50 Cal’s in them, or thermal sensors that can see inside houses, or link to air force flying overhead. Just a strong and reliable chassis, bought cheap on military surplus, given free even.
When troops were deployed during Hurricane Katrina, everyone was yelling at bush for the slow response. Walmart responded faster, shows Bush didn’t have FEMA working right, or knew just how bad it was, and his personal need for a large response. Most presidents just fly over in a helicopter, than say “I feel for you” and say cash us coming.
People started racial agitation, saying get the military in yo stop the looting. Military came. 3rd ID, Fort Benning, Georgia. They saw rioters and said “Hey you, stop”.
People didn’t stop. They knew the military wasn’t going to shit them over a TV set yanked out of a broken windows they were wearing body armor and helmets slushing around in water. Had they had taser grips on the rifle, still wouldn’t, cause water + electricity kills.
So… we had a pointless racial squabble. why? Just cause.
Riot police in cities are specialized in confronting crowds. They are not on a individual level able to walk around on patrol in that getup, and stop crime.
As I discussed with Smears on this site a lot, Shotgun Revolvers allow you to shoot both regular solid round bullets as well rubber balls. I like this aspect about the Taurus. Don’t like it is a revolver. Want police to have magazines, and a revolver design so they can empty rounds fast, or shoot rubber shot, bean bags. I’ve seen taser bullets advertised.
Police should have more dedicated training with Sim Rounds (this requires a sum bolt) so they can practice shooting one another with their real guns, real bullets (gotta wear a face mask and cup)… just low velocity, non lethal bullets. They can practice sparing with each other on mats in a hallway before or after patrol shooting one another as the other attacks, so your used to shooting to incompacitate, not kill.
People get scared, are trained to shoot center mass. Hard to scare someone under great duress to shoot for the knees of a charging man feet away. It can be taught, cause sword sparring was taught similarly.
Sum rounds are cheap, their bolts affordable. One muddle class donar in any city could provide that material to a city police force. Providing Tasers can cost between $300 and up, and aren’t full proof. It can look like torture when you gotta repeatedly sink it into a druggie to incompacitate them. Always bad looking on camera, lawyers line up for police brutality suits when that is seen, as it is always shocking to juries… especially as smart phones only cone out a bit into the altercation, you don’t see how bad it was to begin. I don’t think we got the laws on the books to require judges to dismiss lawyers pushing this aspect in suits, or to overturn convictions. It us non-lethal, but doesn’t know everyone down. Nothing sexy about that. Plus, police shootings still happen when tasers and handguns are both present. I’m sure some are indeed accidental, but fuck.
I would prefer a revolver magazine mix, with rubber balls taser bullets in the revolver, full magazine of normal rounds, with the revolver setting the primary mode. Spin left for rubber bullets, soon right for ball, or put the safety back one more notch for the magazine to come into play. Such a gun doesn’t exist but could easily be made.
Police cars with rifles, should have more shotguns with a few non-lethal alternatives available preloaded. Cops don’t always carry that around, sure you’ve seen them mounted in the front sticking up in police cars, but it can be a option.
I would love it if Black Lives Matters took then concerns as a forefront… Trump’s crowd has a lot of military vets, they know the rules of engadgment issues, and technology limitation issues, think many would like a discussion reviewing tactics… this us a very sensible, pragmatic concern that in many cases can be changed right now, and with very little funding new weapon types can be made. If donate are aware their police force needs body cams, sim rounds, night stick training, Cops want to carry a Taurus with non lethals as a extra sidearm… local philanthropists will be more than willing in many cities to invest once they see how little it costs. It is a investment that saves lives. I’m for stronger yet more competent and humane police and military. I want them to bring the pain if they absolutely gave to, steamroll a situation… but have the confidence, trust, education and experience to know less can be more, and deal with situations more softly. Not everyone needs arrested, sometimes you gotta back off and let a situation cool down.
Gotta go, rest later.
Treating personal drug use as a criminal matter is insane. If anything it is an issue of public health as well as of social construction and how poor inner city areas don’t have adequate opportunities for good jobs… “The street corner is the only place hiring. If you work on the corner at least you have a job, you’ve solved your existential crisis; if you’re in the poor inner city then you can at least use drugs and solve your existential crisis that way too.” -David Simon, of The Wire (paraphrase)
You should care about the real reasons for poverty and violence and dissatisfaction in the inner city. The situation isn’t “rational”, so if you expect a calm and “rational” response from inner city residents to police violence and other issues of inequality and aggression against the poor and minorities then you’re going to be disappointed.
But I suspect that’s exactly the point. You want a reason to keep feeding your indignation and outrage, so you’ll spin anything in any way at all to keep the emotional burner on high.