I call it “Inculisive Self-Harmony”.
It means focus on the balance of harmony both within and surrounding oneself.
The reward is the closest that can be achieved to eternal joy and eventually, actually achieved.
Even with RM, it is never proposed that others are not needed. Quite the contrary in that the first temptation is to use others so as to obtain more power and diminish any potentially contrary influence.
The issue and concern is the realization that such a social structure has a limit to its size and grasp - a provable limit. Currently the thought is that at the right moment, so as to achieve “sustainable” governance, a very large portion of the population must be deleted, else the governance will not be able to maintain its supremacy, a supremacy that it actually had no business attempting to create in the first place.
The ideal is distributed governance, distributed intelligence (Democracy), not central governance or central intelligence (Socialism and/or Communism). But that democracy must be of a specific nature, else it all starts over again.
I very much agree. But what RM proposes, unlike many before it, is the opportunity to discover exactly what is impossible and why. The problem, as usual, is even RM requires that one actually seek what is possible or impossible before they presume, before they try to gain what is beyond their grasp. They see some progress and lustfully rush into it and forget about whether it was anything actually worth accomplishing.