Reality Always Has A Happy Ending

Philosophy Forums Philosophy
1


Many people go through life not wanting to explore it’s meaning and what’s
really happening here because they are afraid it will be BAD news
SO
they adopt a mythological viewpoint as fact to feel safe and ignore everything else.
OR
they believe you can never really know that information so you might as well drop that pursuit.
OR
they adopt an profound academic expression of double talk to pretend to be in pursuit of the truth.

Guess what?
I am not one of those people.
This is not to brag I have just been driven all my life to understand who I really am
and where I am and what’s really going on here.

But I am egotistical enough to believe I have figured it out and it has a happy ending.
After 49 years I narrowed it down to one thesis and model of existence I have been
editing for the last 9 years I titled ‘The Eternal Cycle’.

You can read it here: http://art.net/studios/lou/eternal-cycle.html if you like and see what you think.
Cheers!
Lou

2

What drivel…

There was nothing there worth reading, nothing there worth taking your time out to say… i’m sorry, but… wow.

3

Cyrene I must have touched a sore place in your psyche for you to be so unusually rude.
I’m sorry too.

4

I’m not offended that you don’t like my work.
It’s the ‘worth’ comments that are rude in my book.
Peace.

5

Noitall knows what he is talking about. And you conflict cravers need to kick rocks.

If you dont think we are all one, you are playing games with yourself.

6

Thanks for the love Nano-Bug!

7

I wrote ad copy for a major newspaper in Atlanta for two years and perfected the art of making an idea simple, clear and easy to understand. I was paid to make concepts
CLEAR AND EASY to understand.
When I first published my thesis in 1999, it was on the website for Cornell’s Graduate school faculty as a ‘must read’.
So son if you don’t understand it…it’s on you!

8

That just lowers my opinion of cornell’s graduate school’s ‘must read’ list. You’d think they’d have major scientific publications in X subjects, opposed to some say-nothing scrolling webpage nonsense equivilent to an incoherent soundbyte.

What do you think it is you’re saying thats worthwhile on a scientific or philosophical level? Or any ideaological level.

9

mumbling about your ‘essence’ and etc is nonsense. it really is just plain nonsense, most of what you say is incoherent.

Tell me, what is your ‘essence’

thats not clear what-so-ever, its a vauge nonsensical term. learn to write.

10

Your ‘thesis’ or more accurately, your incoherent rant about ‘being’ is no better than any incoherent run of the mill philosophy, threads are littered with it here, you should fit right in.

11

essence is that which is beyond all definition. The definiton of all defintions comes close to it.

nonsense is okay. nonsense doesn’t need to bother anyone.

are you bothered all the time, or just sometimes?

I like this: nonsensical satrical lyricals that are made by miracles.

12

well that was a waste of time…

13

happy ending still to come . . .

14

Read it again Cyrene.
I made it simple enough for a child to understand.

15

I want Satyr to diagnose this guy. Noitall, talk to a guy named Satyr. He thinks and writes exactly like you do.

16

NoItAll, I have some comments if you’re willing to read; I was willing to read the URL.

Now, there are some problems which arise from the we-are-all-one situation. If actual, this means all good and bad, right and wrong, poisonous and radioactive things are connected to eachother as a oneness. So if you’re at one with an AIDs patient and some psycho-killers and leeches in a swamp and whatever else, how is that going to be good for your health? Part of the self-organization of life, substances, minds, and cosmic bodies, truly requires and has a great nead for SEPARATENESS. You have skin on your body to keep out the crap, and that’s a fact. Same with your mind or soul or anything else like that, there needs to be boundries otherwise you’ll flop down into a pile of compound impure disfunctional mush.

I can’t agree that all is consciousness otherwise I could talk to it and it would respond.
A rock and some dirt is not consciousness.
If it’s sleeping consciousness then it’s unconscious therefor it’s not consciousness, it’s some dead material.

Have you seen what the new-age light-worker types of people write?
They sound drunk to me and you sound similar.

Oh for the love of fuck, there it is again!
I just finished saying how I don’t like it when people talk about humans being gods or becoming gods on another forum, and now it’s here too. This planet is a planet, that’s it. We’ve got some ecosystem, lots of parasites and mutation, a fair amount of animals got extinct, some alien guys eat a few n00bs but they mostly mind their own smarts and don’t need to eat that way, humans and human souls are mostly delerious, you’re really really low on the foodchain and your progress is somewhere between entropy and a snail’s pace. You’re not even 1mm close to god-like status and virtually no other human is, either. If we were another species at top, with some serious technology, well then, maybe, but definitely not like this.

I’m not 100% negative about this either, though. NoItAll, once your dead some part of you will probably get eaten by something stronger and smarter than you, then you’ll reach a sort of oneness with that entity; that will be great. Or maybe it wont eat you, it will assimilate and use whole structures without any need for digestion. You’ll join up in a positive bio-extract collective of some sort, not like the Borg, more spiritual instead. Those are my two main guesses, due to how life gets recycled.

17

I can agree with you on the eating of dead flesh, that is what living things do…

life itself getting recycled however…

logan’s truth: existentially speaking, there is no recycle…

-Imp

18

Simple enough for a child, incoherent to an adult who doesn’t have time for vauge, poorly-written nonsense. It might have been written for a child, but I certainly know children who can write better than that.

I’m asking you to explain in full, what you think you’re saying that has any worth. Why in the world would anyone read that instead of taking the 20seconds (that your page takes to read) and looking for a worthwhile scientific publication or even thousands of steps above your webpage in coherency/complexity, a children’s storybook.

19

Would should start a new religion!

Satyrism!!!

We have this idiot to start another dream-world.

20

Some can understand what NoIt means, like nano and I do and others cannot. Seems to me that there is a reason why it appears as drivel to some. Because it is art. Art cannot be seen the same way by all. It cannot be comprehended the same by all. Art is not just painting or sculpture it is symbols, emotions and thought. Some people understand the Mona Lisa others like myself find it a dull painting without any passion or symbols. Some just think its a wonderful painting because of its monetary value.

Art is part of philosophy. Not all philosophy will be understood by all, nor should it. A person that can dissect genes and understand genes probably cannot understand how to or make a cabinet that will last generations and actually have doors that close. A cabinet maker probably could not dissect genes or understand them. Why is it so hard to understand that philosophy and art are not things that fit or work for everyone the same? Not even religion or politics are one size fits all. Yet humans continue to try and make these things fit all. Its down right silly and idiotic to condemn and force others to think as you do per philosphy, religion, politics and art. These are all very personal things within. Is it not a great thing that we see these things differently? It may be drivel and stupid to you but, once you understand that it is not to others you may find a bit of growth within you. I know I forget that from time to time that is part of being a fallible human.