(darn character limits) it should read…

“Reason” is deducted from (embedded in) the visual-geometric world, what we call reason is really: Allowed geometric logical operations, or simply the permitted (allowed) movement of objects and their characteristics, according to the boundary (boundaries of objects = symmetry) conditions

I’ve come to the conclusion that reason is ‘deduced’ from the world of visual geometry, and what we call “reason” is really the application of system logic to a set. And the set itself contains phoenomena that are allowed in the set, or not allowed, by the axioms of the set (i.e. set theory).

So try to think of set theory (visualize a circle), now visualize ‘dots’ in that circle. That would be the set of all things that look like dots (regardless of their color, any thing you see that bears resemblence to that dot, is “dot like” or similar to dots in the “dot set”.

If this is really the case (as I am postulating), then it follows that “math” is really embedded in the information of the universe and we are just converting frequencies of light to different form of energy, which we cal data. And the data exists in it’s own infometric (informational geometric) space.

Imagine a circle, now inside the circle, there is just zeo’s and 1’s, that’s the easiest way to put it, strings of data that are informatic (information ) reflection of the object you are seeing that exists “out there”. That is, outside your head in geometric space.

I hope I’m making sense to you guys, because it makes sense to me. What are your thoughts on this issue?

** Edited because fixed a few spelling errors, punc, missing words**