It’s too schematic, this noumena business.
God’s world has blurrier edges.
people don’t know how to listen
Tha’s not a problem for this century. I’ve made peace with that.
Well that’ll learn me.
I sense no sarcasm here. Go away.
Problem is, both Hume & Adler call inductive justifications “facts” (actions/justifications/inductions), rather than reserving that status for is/being/truth.
I said I was looking forward to this, but he already said it:
It’s the “whole good” that is merely normative (not terminal/existential/inducted—EVEN in hindsight of a whole life) part. He puts oughts in values, rather than actions/particularizing (but the blue inductive/justified sphere is facts, rather than the yellow being/truth sphere, for him). He is all over the place. I already noted this earlier. …just revisiting.
Click down arrow to reveal missing quote after word “assuming”:
So if definitions are not triadic, then identity only belongs in yellow (if yellow is description, blue is prescription, red is subscription). But if identity (that you subscribe to who you are, and vice versa) is demonstrated via blue/induction, then Adler has a point.